|
By:
BOOOOOOOOOOM CARNAGE
|
|
By:
6666666666666666666666666666
|
|
By:
I wanted to post what I wrote about Brendon in first 6 overs and why to back NZ at the break!!
|
|
By:
Pauliow
Thought you'd done your arm in! ![]() |
|
By:
TIMBER
|
|
By:
I have Charlie, still causing me grief.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
aye aye
|
|
By:
Why is Wood bowling 80 mph when he 93 when he first played
|
|
By:
nvmd it was a slower ball... TIMBERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
|
|
By:
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugr wicket that
|
|
By:
Dylan!
|
|
By:
overreaction 4 eng to touch nearly 2/1 now too much other way 4/8 imho
|
|
By:
wow thats a massive swing 2.80 down to 1.67 for that wicket still 48-2 from 4 overs
|
|
By:
4/6
|
|
By:
id have England about 2.2
|
|
By:
Rashid, no need to do anything g fancy, Williamson tends to wait pretty much for poor balls.
|
|
By:
Sorry to here that Paul.
Obviously everyone's had far too much too drink. |
|
By:
evs each of 2 now
|
|
By:
Things take longer to heal as you get older Charlie
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
man this mkt is well volatile
|
|
By:
GSM NZ... ROY **** OFF
|
|
By:
As I remember you're just a sprog!
|
|
By:
HALES **** OFF. ROY SORRY
|
|
By:
And you sit around all day doing nothing.
|
|
By:
drop 1.13 fall of wicket?, go up .4 after a 16 run over, 64-2 after 5 ain't bad
|
|
By:
win or lose NZ huge value
|
|
By:
NZ should really win from here after such an electric start if they play half sensibly..don't need to slog
eng need wkts intriguingly poised |
|
By:
however asked for 66-2 after 6 about right, even better now
|
|
By:
whoever
|
|
By:
If anyone can work out what the correct odds are then they're a better man than me. And since my sex change that's not too difficult to do.
|
|
By:
Bowling ball test for Charlie?
|
|
By:
Paul. 5:30, that's a lie for me.
|
|
By:
lol Ian Smith said Timber
|
|
By:
![]() What time you up? |
|
By:
i'm well impressed with Wylliamson this series..serious player
|