Feb 15, 2015 -- 9:45AM, peckerdunne wrote:
Most unlike Pak.................
Yeah, I make sure I don't hang around in the market too long when either of these teams are playing. Leaving yourself exposed in the market with these 2 is asking for trouble no matter the odds. Anything can happen.
Have a few overs now to see how these 2 are going before bothering to do anything. Still plenty of time and plenty of batting.
Feb 15, 2015 -- 9:47AM, lindsay1978 wrote:
yes but SA have world class batsmen
So do Pakistan. And the point wasn't they could match it, but they have 250% the time to do about the same as them.
FTR I agree with that decision too. Should have been not out based on the rules and process, but it was out. Could see the deflection. Evidence didn't back it up, but correct decision again.
Technically 2 decisions against the rules today, but both have been correct. IMO
Feb 15, 2015 -- 10:09AM, DStyle wrote:
there are still 3rd umpires who have yet to understand that their role during a review is not to adjudicate whether a player was out or not, rather it is conclusively disprove the on-field decision.
Well, in our opinion. Maybe the consistency is showing their role is exactly what it is?
!Feb 15, 2015 -- 10:12AM, DStyle wrote:
don't understand that post BJT.that wasn't an opinion that i was stating; that's the method on which DRS is based.
Yes.
My point was, the fact that they still "don't understand their role", might suggest that they do understand their role but it is misrepresented to us?
Not my view, just a thought.
Feb 15, 2015 -- 10:13AM, lindsay1978 wrote:
yes and the odds are reflecting this but there is hope even if bob and no are saying it
Don't worry about him, he will be posting his predictions tomorrow on what happened yesterday. Just a boring aftertimer with no opinion of his own.

