Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1275 comments are related to the topic:
England vs Sri Lanka decider 20/6 - 24/6/14
England vs Sri Lanka decider 20/6 - 24/6/14
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,275
|
By:
not about evidence, as the evidence for the catch was wholly conclusive and out, the no ball had much doubt.
|
|
By:
match ref confirms as much - benefit goes with the bowler.
|
|
By:
who painted that line,beefy?
|
|
By:
benefit of the doubt to the bowler
 games gone fcking mad  |
|
By:
that "side-view" we keep seeing should be at ground level so we get to see when/where the foot lands
|
|
By:
wicket coming...
|
|
By:
tea coming :-)
|
|
By:
crazy really because there was absolutely no way you can say for sure the foot was behind the line, so BOD to bowler, seriously the game has gone mad
 |
|
By:
I don't care whether the benefit of doubt goes to batsman, bowlers whoever, can go to the fcking pigeon for all I care
what p1sses me off is sometimes its benefit to the batsman, sometimes the bowler, sometimes the umpire I mean ffs just a little consistency wouldn't go a miss |
|
By:
joke england drop from 160 - 90's in last 2 overs
|
|
By:
bad calls are frustrating, especially when you're on the wrong side of them.
evens out in time though. |
|
By:
new ball in 3overs
|
|
By:
If the umpire had called no ball, and was referred would prior of been given out,
 |
|
By:
whos on draw whos on SL
|
|
By:
it would of been reviewed, as have seen it before
|
|
By:
I think more to the point is if someone is given out lbw, they refer it and it is a marginal no-ball decision like that you wanna give someone out based on that
|
|
By:
we will agree to differ
 |
|
By:
cricket in general is getting on my t1ts this Test
|
|
By:
I think we need hawkeye to track the position of the foot landing like it plots the position of the ball landing, would solve a lot of problems
|
|
By:
yes that bowden clear edge was a real shocker, he must off had his eyes closed
|
|
By:
if they're 9 down second innings lose the match unless they review, might as well just check for it
 |
|
By:
when a review is taken the third umpire checks all aspects of the decision to include the no ball.
|
|
By:
So here we go for final session cracker
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
rain eain wh r u
|
|
By:
if the umpire calls no ball on a close call, they review the catch which is clearly taken, and the bowler was clearly behind the line, then not out
|
|
By:
3 over till new ball - that will do the trick I think
|
|
By:
as equally the inverse will apply
|
|
By:
Jaya having a bowl - be funny if he took a hattrick
|
|
By:
A minimum of 40 overs to be played. Its 4.20 now. 13 an over until 6.30pm is 28ish. What time can they play until to squeeze another 12 overs in? Or do we count down until a certain time?" All the overs are bowling on the final day, weather permitting, if required. No cut-off
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
new ball could finish game
|
|
By:
new ball should hopefully finish this off well before then. Due after the next over - SL surely take it as soon as it's available.
|
|
By:
New ball
 |
|
By:
think matthews needs spell with new ball
|
|
By:
big if but if England survive the first 10 overs of the new balls, odds on draw will be odds on
|
|
By:
3 wasted overs poor stuff
|
|
By:
agree why use jay
|
|
By:
that's a bit like saying if your auntie had b0ll0cks WCE but I take your point
|
|
By:
around half of wickets have been in the first 10/15 overs of a new ball
|