Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1275 comments are related to the topic:
England vs Sri Lanka decider 20/6 - 24/6/14
England vs Sri Lanka decider 20/6 - 24/6/14
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,275
|
By:
not even that - encouraging movement though !
|
|
By:
hands up if you actually want Engerland to win? Am I lonesome?
|
|
By:
Herath needs to bowl from the widest legal area - he's bowling too straight and landing it too straight.
|
|
By:
wicket coming...
|
|
By:
that's it - get it going boys !
|
|
By:
yeah sense break through
|
|
By:
does the last hour start at 17:39?????
|
|
By:
fair play england giving themselves a chance
|
|
By:
yep - always on the cards - been calling for it !! - noball ???
|
|
By:
Nadal looking shaky in the tennis...
|
|
By:
NB
|
|
By:
No ball imo.
|
|
By:
No ball I'm afraid. Will they give it though?
|
|
By:
that is a no-ball end of
|
|
By:
You're talking millimetres though.
|
|
By:
What's the point of a still with the foot in the air?!
|
|
By:
Wow
|
|
By:
LMAO
|
|
By:
yeah he's OK - big chunk behind !! BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMM
|
|
By:
some really shocking umpiring in this series on both sides
|
|
By:
To be fair, prior looked like a rabbit in the headlights so could't see him lasting much longer.
|
|
By:
I'd be seething if I hadn't backed SL!
|
|
By:
i layed them, mugged
|
|
By:
I'm on SL but personally felt that that was a no ball
|
|
By:
what you on grant ive got sri lanka at 5/2 ime no grrening out yet
|
|
By:
PHEW ! - On another point Prior will now be everyone's bunny because he will be targeted with the short stuff every time. Happened to Trott and he went mental !
|
|
By:
1.3 is big. New ball should do the trick.
|
|
By:
this wont last another hour
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
45 overs with Jordan, Broad ( LH ) and Anderson ( LH )
|
|
By:
another prime example of corrupt
match officials. |
|
By:
through everything !
|
|
By:
3rd ump done well there imo and got the correct decision. Bit of the heel landed behind the line and imo benefit should go with the bowler there. Certainly wasn't enough evidence to say conclusively that it was a no ball. Good umpiring imo.
SL surely wrap this up now with the new ball still to come. |
|
By:
jaffa
|
|
By:
Prior..shocking 3rd ump decision by Reifel
batsmen gets benefit of doubt He forgot this DOH ¬ |
|
By:
Jordans been a good find but this will be too much for him - he's a banger
|
|
By:
it is NOT in the laws of the game that batsmen get the benefit of the doubt on any aspect of the game
|
|
By:
the "still" with the foot in the air screwed us (eng)
|
|
By:
terrible call, you could not say 100 percent it was a legitimate ball, batsmen gets benefit, and yes the unwritten laws of cricket, umps having a shocking test
 |
|
By:
Batsmen get enough BOD as it is. Way I see it was that it was given out. Was there enough in those replays to overturn that due to a no ball? Not for me. Hence correct decision imo.
Big turn there for Herath |