Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
donny osmond
25 Nov 13 10:16
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Mar 08
| Topic/replies: 85,197 | Blogger: donny osmond's blog
Early odds

Aussies 2.64-2.68
England 3.80-3.90
Draw......2.74-2.76

A drop in wicket.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 35  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 35 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,376
By:
Foinavon
When: 25 Nov 13 16:13
Have already backed the draw a little higher than that with a view to laying off in play. Adelaide has a reputation for big scores so am hoping the draw goes odds on at some stage.
By:
steview84
When: 25 Nov 13 20:55
i'm expecting a massive backlash from england.  will be lumping on.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 25 Nov 13 21:20
Fcuk yeah!
By:
geordie1956
When: 25 Nov 13 23:14
Best wait to see how the first session develops - as much as I want England to come back quickly I fear this could be a long long tour with no happy ending
By:
junior007
When: 25 Nov 13 23:43
We better not serve up a bouncy pitch in Adelaide, there will be none of them left to terrorise in Perth. 

A bit contusion averse the poms.  One has already gone home with Perth flu.
By:
therhino
When: 26 Nov 13 11:27
Not sure how you could expect a fcuk yeah massive backlash from England based off what we saw in the first test. Who in that team has the set to lead such a backlash after being owned so royally? Genuine question. Not being a smart arse. It certainly ain't the captain. Everything rests on the English bowling attack imo, if they win the toss they should bowl. A good start is a necessity and they are more likely to get that from the bowlers than the batting lineup, who looked like boys against angry men.

Maybe if the attack knock us over cheaply it could provide some confidence. Forget the pitch and the day 1 conditions, the massive problem between the ears (and legs) needs to fixed fast and Swann, Broad and Anderson the most likely.
By:
ClayDavis
When: 26 Nov 13 12:28
I think people are getting carried away here. Are we all forgetting just how bad the Aussie top 6 batting line up is? Clarke aside it really is awful. Hayden and Johnson got them out of the more in the first innings and then two woeful batting performances from England flattered Australia.
Does anyone really trust Johnson to back up his bowling display? Nope me neither. He blitzed england in Perth three years ago and then was appalling in the next test in Melbourne.
Cook, Pietersen and Bell are still far superior to anything the Aussies have batting wise and if they three come to the party then the Aussies are in trouble. Broad has the x factor and is a match winner for England. Also I thought Joe Root showed good signs in the 2nd innings.
Someone on the commentary during the first test - I think it was Atherton - compared David Warner to Michael Slater and I have never heard so much rubbish in all my life. Warner has a good eye. Slater had it all and was a superb opening batsmen.
By:
THERE....IS....NO....SPOOOOON
When: 26 Nov 13 12:32
Don't spoil the fun, CD. Laugh

shhhhhh.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 26 Nov 13 12:44
Good point Rhino,

England in deep do do.  Root goes to 3. Finn comes in for Tremlett.  Prior has to stay to keep the upper lip appearing stiff but is a big worry although he is proven and a fighter, just not batting well.

The question is who to play at 6.  I would bite down hard and throw Stokes in.  He is precociously talented,  can bowl a few overs if Finn's radar is malfunctioning and being young is probably quite excited rather than trepidatious.

I actually think it would be better to bat and put up a big score.  If they do that everything else will fall into place and Swann may get a helpful pitch at the end.  Runs on the board gives you confidence.  If Aus put up a big score first England are behind the 8 and it will be more of the same with Aussie tails up.

6 wickets for 9 runs caused big problems.  I think if Pietersen and Bell don't have to bat till after 30 overs things will be ok this time and Root at 3 will help in this regard.  Trott was a walking wicket if Cook fell early as he did.  I thought Carberry looked ok and left well in the first innings.

If Cook doesn't get out early England will bat well.  These things balance on fine edges.  Harris was in his last over when he got Cook out.  Things may have been different not that Aus didn't smash us after that but this Aussie team is not very good.  I don't expect them to stay on top for long!

It is always darkest in the middle of the night.  People seem to forget some of these guys were part of the worst Aussie team since 1978.  World beaters they are not!
By:
SecondComing
When: 26 Nov 13 13:45
People saying Johnson can't back it up are deadset kidding themselves, you all need to understand how he got picked. He was getting wickets on those road pitches in India, he's been marked as one of our better bowlers for a very long time, in my opinion he got too comfortable and needed the kick to get him going again

After what happened in Brisbane, England would settle for a draw here and knowing the Adelaide pitch.. it's a likely outcome. Also Root only looked good in the 2nd innings because Australia were trying to get him off strike to get rid of the bunny up the other end, either way we will find out if this England team is over-hyped or the Aussie bowling is simply too good

It will be a road pitch
By:
SecondComing
When: 26 Nov 13 13:55
Now that I think about it Clarke would be very happy to lose the toss.. put all the pressure on England to provide what they couldn't provide at the Gabba, lots of runs and of course if they get bowled out on day 1.. that's the series imo
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 26 Nov 13 15:03
One swallow doesn't make a summer Second!

I have been watching MJ in the IPL too and he has been bowling well.  I was surprised he didn't tour quite frankly. You guys seem to think bowling fast equals wickets.  It doesn't.  He bowled well in bursts.  Root is a good player of fast bowling, watch him he has plenty of time and has young eyes and muscles.  Adelaide won't be as bouncy.


England need an opening wicket stand and then we will see how high Mitchell Johnson's arm stays when he bowls!  Could be a flash in the dunney!  Back to back matches will test Harris and MJ.  Bananaman Siddle will be ok but isn't really a huge wicket taking threat at the moment.

Australia still have a brittle batting line up.  The match may revolve around how many runs England can get and to be fair they haven't been inclining to a big score for some time.  Things is if England can win what does that say about Australia?
By:
DJSteer
When: 26 Nov 13 20:02
How are people so sure about the pitch when it's a new, drop-in one? I know historically Adelaide's a road, but that's not the same pitch.. Am I missing something?
By:
JustWinBaby
When: 26 Nov 13 20:29
England haven't become a bad side overnight and on the flipside whilst the Australian team seem to be on an upward swing since the English summer (look a lot more settled if nothing else) I still question their top 6. What were they, 130 odd for 6 when Haddin and Mitch rescued them in the first inning in Brisbane? Sure they batted well second innings but it is easy to bat when you know you have a first innings lead of 150.

Laying Australia big time.
By:
BJT
When: 27 Nov 13 10:01
No they didn't become a bad side overnight.  Been that way for a long time.

What are you talking about?  How is the England top 6 going?
The opinion of the pitch was that it was a road.  As Aus showed in the second innings.  It is just as easy for England to bat on a road, that they just watched a bowler and wicket keeper score plenty on.
And how did their top 6 go?

Apart from Bell, none of the English batsmen have impressed anybody in the last 6 games against Australia.

But yes, you are right.  Aus were 6/132, so their top 6 not doing the job.  Certainly not doing the job of England who were 87 when they lost their 6th wicket, then 146 for 6 in the second innings.

England have scored:
215
375
361
7/349
368
3/37
238
330
377
5/206
136
179
Most of those games they batted first and 3rd in the best conditions...

They have scored 3171 runs in 12 innings averaging 30.2 per wicket, or innings of 302.
Australia have scored:
280
296
128
235
7/527
7/172
270
224
9/492
6/111
295
7/401
3431 runs averaging 32.37 runs per wicket, or 323.7 runs per innings.  And they have been doing that on 4th innings pitches, in the worst of the conditions.

No, they haven't suddenly become **** overnight.  Been going on for a while now.  Yes, Australias batting in the top 6 is questionable, but we are bringing in better batsmen, while you are losing one of your best.


Eng/Aus 3 worst
136/128
179/224
215/235

Eng/Aus 3 best
377/ 7/527
375/ 9/492
368/ 7/401

Not only are England worse when they are bad, but they are not as good when they are good.

Say what you like about the Australians.  But throughout these 2 series, they have the better performed batsmen, the better performed bowlers, the better combined innings, the least shocking innings, and have done it all without their best team on the field.

Lay away.
By:
Aussie Driver
When: 27 Nov 13 12:03
Long range forecast is for rain next Thursday in beautiful Adelaide. That said, it is impossible to have genuine confidence in either team batting for long periods of time regardless of the pitch, especially England.

So I guess what I am saying is I have no idea Plain
By:
BJT
When: 27 Nov 13 12:13
Not until the coin toss.  Wink
By:
SecondComing
When: 27 Nov 13 12:22
Bowling fast does equal wickets when it's not hooping around under overcast skies.. like in England

if you have naturally aggressive bowlers you can intimidate the batsmen, make them feel the heat and put the pressure right back on them, especially on these hard bouncy Australian wickets

Fact is this, England has a better batting line up but Australia has the better bowling line up in the conditions, if it was swinging and all that jazz then Anderson would come into his own but the fact is that it's not and it won't be either, particularly in Adelaide

England need a draw as their worst result, losing on a Batsmen's paradise would bring back the good old days, the fact they've gone for the old media ban says to me they know they're up **** creek
By:
donny osmond
When: 27 Nov 13 16:47
25 nov odds

Aussies 2.64-2.68
England 3.80-3.90
Draw......2.74-2.76



today 27 nov

Aussies 2.74-2.78
England 3.95-4-10
Draw ....2.56-2.60
By:
pxb
When: 27 Nov 13 20:19
Losing Trott seen as a big negative. But given his poor batting in Brisbane, probably a positive for Eng.

Rain doesn't seem a big issue at this stage. I'd have Eng shorter and the draw bigger by a fair amount.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 27 Nov 13 22:20
I agree pxb,

First we have Cook stuck on the crease bringing in Trott for walkies.  That brings the engine room in to face a newish ball and how many times have England been 20-3? ( sorry if you are reading this upside down 3-20! )

The loss of Trott is a big plus in cricket terms as he was contributing nothing and hopefully will galvanise the others to show some aggression.

Looks like they may be asking Bell to step up to the plate and technically it makes sense but I would rather keep him where he is and give Root the chance.

Finn must come in as he is a wicket taker and I would balance that with Stokes.

Talk of Panesar is a bit premature as the drop in is a big conundrum and I heard the groundsman today said he would leave it well grassed.

I wonder if Boof will be stout enough to bring in Faulkener for Bailey?  England will be going after Lyon and or Smith.
By:
pxb
When: 27 Nov 13 23:03
I've seen the groundsman quote as saying the drop in will play like a traditional Adelaide pitch. But with more grass could be carnage the first 1 to 2 sessions. I certainly won't be looking to back to lay the draw.

But I could be backing the draw end of day 1.

Doesn't seem to be a toss+bat/bowl market, but I can't be sure as BF navigation is so f'ed up. But win toss and bowl looks to me the way to go.
By:
oddduck
When: 27 Nov 13 23:09
Does anyone know off the top of their head if the Nov 2012 drawn Aus/SA test in Adelaide was rain affected? Thanks
By:
Aussie Driver
When: 28 Nov 13 00:41
Almost certain there were no rain delays in that 2012 drawn test
By:
Alf Awoody
When: 28 Nov 13 02:37
HeHe, funny listening to the incessant talking up of Joe Roots whopping innings of 26.

Reminds me of the Poms giving the Aussies a (rightful) dig when we did the same about Khawaja's 30 odd in an SCG Ashes Test.

Ah, the Poms, back to talking up mediocrity.
By:
earlycrow
When: 28 Nov 13 06:03
I can see Australia declaring at tea on day one and in forcing the follow on before stumps
By:
earlycrow
When: 28 Nov 13 06:12
Gee I thought I just wrote some crap but I just read some of the other posts. The crap about how good England's batting is is a joke. Australians know our team is crap ATM. Come on pasties smell the coffee
By:
megsy
When: 28 Nov 13 07:26
a wicket simular to brisbanes has been lifted in at adelaide.


if that dont scare the poms, wait till they get to perth, now thats fast Shocked
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 28 Nov 13 08:25
Blimey Crow,

Did I hear that right? Austrlians know how crap out team is ATM
By:
BJT
When: 28 Nov 13 08:26

Nov 27, 2013 -- 11:09PM, oddduck wrote:


Does anyone know off the top of their head if the Nov 2012 drawn Aus/SA test in Adelaide was rain affected? Thanks


Not off the top of my head, but a quick look shows 450 overs bowled which suggests zero loss of overs.  That was a draw because SA batted 148 overs at 1.67 RR with 2 wickets in hand.
The reason it was so close to a result, looks like because Aus took it on scoring 550 in 107 overs in the first innings.
SA then scored 3.1 an over for 125 overs, Aus at 3.81 to set up a go at SA, who held on batting near 2 days.
Don't see that as a road, but certainly looked to be best on day 1.

Won't be the same pitch obviously, but have far more faith in SA batting time than England.  Our bowling is exponentially better than that test too.
SA spinner went at near 8 an over for 23 overs, yet second innings Lyon was the only one they couldn't score off.
3rd innings went the same, with the spinner taken to task and destroyed by Aus, yet the final innings Lyon took 3/49 off 50 overs.
Certainly an interesting game.

England need to win the toss and not go in with the attitude that the pitch will be a road, like I think they did last match..

By:
earlycrow
When: 28 Nov 13 09:32
You read correct whispering, hard to remember a worse batting line up
By:
donny osmond
When: 28 Nov 13 12:35
..2012 aus v sa at adelaide

http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-south-africa-2012/engine/match/573008.html

tahir match figures 260-0 ... 37 overs Shocked

and ...

http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-south-africa-2012/content/story/593261.html
By:
cunningplan
When: 29 Nov 13 08:43
Whisperingdeath 20 Nov 13 22:29 Joined: 25 Dec 11 | Topic/replies: 3,288 | Blogger: Whisperingdeath's blog
It's first night nerves love, bite on a pillow and think of England!Laugh

It will alright by the morning!



can i come out from behind the sofa yet, tell me i was dreaming
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 29 Nov 13 10:05
Cunning,

It was worse than that!

It is like when I saw the daleks go up the stairs for the first time!  I never hid behind the sofa watching Dr Who in the knowledge I could run up the stairs.  Now I feel I live in a bungalow!

Pattison is back!  I am not a huge Siddle fan ( good but not enough ).  If Pattison is fit for WACAday I might want to be beamed aboard The Enterprise and taken to a far away galaxy where they don't play cricket...like AmericaLaugh!  I shall be there for Melbourne and Sydney ( which may be a good thing! ).

The batting is the problem for me.  Trott going is a plus.  Cook still needs a dance instructor.   A journalist commented how stoic he was not cutting or pulling  in the second innings at Brisbane....der that is his game!  He isn't a great driver as he hardly moves his front foot.  At least 3 should be able to resist leaving 4 and 5 some respite from the new ball!

All is not gloom.  Aus batting is still brittle.  The top 3 can throw their wickets away at any time.  Bailey and Smith are relatively inexperienced at Test level.  If Aus don't change their team I think they may struggle if the pitch is benign. MJ may be less effective and his radar might go and Harris will have to pile up the mileage particularly if England try and attrition it out.

But yes Cunning, we need an exceptionally cunning cunning plan, more cunning than a cunning fox with a degree in cunningness from oxford university!  Or maybe just a decent batting coach!
By:
DStyle
When: 29 Nov 13 10:55
I feel that this is a very big test match for England, both for this series and for the future.

England are the Caroline Wozniacki of cricket. Grinding, defensive, consistent, unspectacular and in frequent needs of direction from their coach.

It is enough to deal with inconsistent sides, but will come up short when outperformed. Australia aspire to be better than they are consistently capable of being but as they aim higher, they can often outperform a side like England on their day (maybe an Ivanovic).

The problem for England is that they have had to defend their approach a lot recently and of late have resorted to specious results based reasoning. It allows their bubble to be preserved and the background concerns about whether they really are playing in the right way to be put aside. And not wasting mental energy on such things is important. Belief in your method is a big part of the game.

Now the result in Brisbane can be largely put down to a great performance from Johnson, some wily captaincy from Clarke, the Trott issue, and some indifferent stuff from Swann. England can also throw in the old 1st test of a series voodoo curse and can probably still come away thinking that if they fix a few things it's back to normal.

I maintain that Johnson's bowling is as vulnerable to going wayward as it always has been. He thrives on confidence and I am as certain as can be that his early release from the India ODIs was entirely about protecting his confidence for this series. There is a danger that another good performance may be enough to see him through the series, but likewise a poor one and it could easily knock him off kilter.

But more importantly, if England don't turn up, and Australia perform again, these nagging questions about the approach break through the bubble and get in everybody's head. A loss in Adelaide or even early trouble in Adelaide and I wonder if England will win a test, because i fear for a contagious self doubt that might contaminate the entire team. England need to start strong and stay strong throughout.

So as for the prices, I like England for a starting point, mainly because i think they're big and there's been an overreaction, but also because I can quickly and aggressively reverse that position if there are signs of concern. Also think you can afford to be a little toss neutral here, as the drop in wicket may do a little first up which balances up the advantage of batting first.
By:
BJT
When: 29 Nov 13 10:56
The problem for England, is even on flat wickets, England haven't scored over ~360 in the last 12 innings (12 innings total, how many were flat is up for debate).  So unless they lift their game, which of course they can, then even a flat wicket may not save them.

Aus batting may seem brittle, but Warner is in form, and Rogers in his 6 games against England has put up 2 50s, 1 100, and a 49, which suggests is quite capable of at least seeing off a new ball.  Not to mention has been very unlucky on at least 1 occassion in being given out.
Warner after a terrible run of form, and being dropped from the team for not dropping Root, has come home for domestic cricket and gone from doing nothing to scoring
139
138
197
in 5 one day matches, and
104
52
51* in 3 first class matches.  Of course there is the 173 in 2 innings against England immediately following that.

Watson on a flat pitch has shown he is more than capable of taking apart your bowlers,
Clarke has,
since 2005, scored at Adelaide:
124
21*
118
110
71
61*
2
80
210
37
230
38
So is averaging 110.2 at Adelaide since 2005, including double centuries in his last 2 games here.  Bailley has his first game out of the way, is in great ODI form, but the jury still out on him.
If all else fails, our wicket keeper is averaging more for the 2 series than your best batsman Cook, coming off a 94 and 53 in the last match.


England need more than just a flat pitch to save them if they don't win the toss, because we already know if they don't win the toss, they will play for a draw.  We know what happens then.  6/9...........
By:
BJT
When: 29 Nov 13 11:54
Dstyle.
I think you are pretty spot on.
In regards to Johnson though, I don't think he is any more vulnerable than Anderson/Broad.  When the conditions suit, they take a bag, when they don't, they get smacked around the park.  And they need different conditions, so are hardly "on" at the same time.

Broad at Brisbane got wickets, but that was due to the Australians more than him.  He certainly bowled decent, but Aus gave their wickets up more than he took them.
Chester-le-street, on the other hand, he took them, and looked like he could have taken plenty more.  That spell of bowling by Broad was by far the best bowled test I have seen recently throughout the 2 series.
If he doesn't take a bag though, which is often, he goes for plenty.  He isn't much different in that regard than Johnson.  In fact, even with the batting, neither team would be too concerned with having them as their next batsman in.  Very similar in regards to results, but obviously Johnson is much quicker, and should be much more effective in Aus.

Anderson of course however, is much worse than either.  After the first test, what exactly has he done?
First test:
10/158.
Since
3/80
2/153
2/138
5/122
2/140


Anderson at Nottingham:
7/119
1/157
9/98
11/71
5/131
6/116
10/158

49/850
15% of his wickets have been taken there, and averages about 17 or so there.
286/9196
He averages 32.15 outside of that ground.

Adelaide he has:
1/108
6/143
Australia he has:
1/195
1/108
3/110
2/114
6/143
4/126
5/115
7/127
2/140

31/1178

That is an average of 38 when bowling in Australia.

Compare that with somebody like Harris, who is yet to have a series he averaged over 30, and is currently sitting on an average that puts him in the elite.

Talk about Johnson all you like, but realistically, Anderson is the one most likely to fail, and Broad really is less consistent than Johnson.
Who for the record has had issues, but since 2012, has taken
6/164
6/79
3/92
0/60
9/103

Adelaide all up has to his name:
6/159
5/85
8/208

19 wickets @23.8

Perth for the record:
5/144
11/159
5/159
9/82
6/164

averaging 16.89....

Brisbane:
4/96
9/69
4/110
0/170
9/103
26/548
Averaging 21.08

Melbourne:
3/46
2/163
6/82
2/134
6/79
19@26.53

Sydney:
2/181
4/118
5/91
4/168
3/92
18@36.11

Apart from Sydney, there is nothing to suggest at all that he isn't an exceptional bowler on home soil.  Very few matches where he failed.

4 games out of 24 where he didn't have at the very least very good figures.
Compare that with somebody like Anderson, who has had 3 out of the last 4 games as extremely poor.

I understand that Johnson is seen as a wayward bowler, but he has no reason not to have confidence going into Adelaide.  Coming off a 9 for, averaging under 24 at the ground.
Anderson?
And not forgetting Clarke averages 110+ at Adelaide coming off 2 double centuries in the last 2 games, Australia have every reason to believe that Adelaide is perfect for them.

England of course have a good record, at least Pietersen loves it there, and Cook has a double century, but neither are really considered in any form better than woeful.
By:
earlycrow
When: 29 Nov 13 20:08
PETER SIDDLE KEEN TO CONTINUE ASHES MOMENTUM 2:19
Play video

Peter SIddle says he isn't worried about the short turnaround from Adelaide to Perth, saying Australia's focus is only on a 2-0 Ashes lead.
Simon Mackin celebrates after claiming the wicket of Ian Bell in Alice Springs. AFP PHOTO / Saeed Khan Source: AFP
ANDREW FLINTOFF ON JONATHAN TROTT'S STRESS-RELATED ILLNESS 0:59
Play video

Former England captain Andrew Flintoff says Jonathon Trott's stress-related illness may be down to off-field factors as the batsman returned home following the first Ashes Test.

Peter Siddle keen to continue Ashes mome...Simon Mackin celebrates after claiming t...Andrew Flintoff on Jonathan Trott's stre...
NEW week, same story for the fragile English batting line-up.

On an Alice Springs day tailor-made for runs, the visitors spluttered before declaring at 7-212 against the Chairman's XI, with more questions than answers as they seek an Ashes spark and middle-order rock for the second Test.

In reply, the hosts saw off 10 overs before stumps to reach 0-16, with Steve Cazzulino and Marcus Harris unbeaten on five and 10, respectively, showing up further a tame England effort.

Excluding fiery Victorian Jayde Herrick, an attack of largely Sheffield Shield aspirants - and a recently retired sushi delivery driver - took advantage of some spectacular fielding to keep England's miserable tour mired in second gear.

All three English batsmen on audition for an Adelaide Test berth gave hope, rather than certainty, that they'd hold their own in the Ashes.

And none could make that water-tight case that he, without question, was the man.


Matt Prior walks off after failing with the bat again. (Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images) Source: Getty Images
Jonny Bairstow was impressive and unbeaten on 31 when acting skipper Ian Bell called England in, but he'd taken the bowlers at their low ebb after they'd baked in the Traeger Park sun all afternoon.

Gary Ballance, run out for a workmanlike 55, batted as if it were a timeless match rather than a two-day hitout having made only four total runs in his three previous appearances for England.

And just when Ben Stokes appeared to have momentum in the hunt for Jonathan Trott's job, he fell to a sparkling Harris catch at short leg for 28.

MARK WAUGH SLAMS WHINGING ENGLISH CRICKETERS 3:10
Play video

Aussie batting great Mark Waugh says England should be enjoying their tour of Australia and their barring of the Australian media is unwarranted.
Compounding England's problems, out-of-form Test gloveman Matt Prior failed again in his quest for batting practice, falling cheaply for the fifth time in succession.

Prior, who had made just 34 runs since arriving in Australia, looked comfortable, if a little breezy, in racing to 19.

But he fell to a regulation leg-cutter from Simon Mackin -- who has previously worked delivering sushi in Perth -- feathering a catch to 16-year-old wicketkeeper Jake Doran.

ANDREW FLINTOFF ON JONATHAN TROTT'S STRESS-RELATED ILLNESS 0:59
Play video

Former England captain Andrew Flintoff says Jonathon Trott's stress-related illness may be down to off-field factors as the batsman returned home following the first Ashes Test.
The injury-hit gloveman, England's vice-captain on tour, handed the reins to Bell so he could focus exclusively on his batting.

But even though his chance came early with openers Michael Carberry (6) - to another brilliant low Harris catch at mid-wicket - and Joe Root (22) out cheaply, Prior couldn't cash in on his opportunity at No.4.

He played some expansive drives that weren't fully rewarded on the huge and lush playing surface, but he also had a little luck with balls that flew through and over the slips cordon before running out of luck after 27 deliveries.

Which left Test wannabes Ballance and Stokes all afternoon to press their case - an invitation they unwittingly spurned.


Gary Ballance made a half-century before being run out. (Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images) Source: Getty Images
Ballance, who hit his fifth boundary to bring up an at-times painfully slow half-century off 124 deliveries, was clearly frustrated when his own errant call cost him an invaluable opportunity.

"It would have been nice to push on and get a hundred … but I've given myself a bit confidence and if I get picked I'll be ready," said the Zimbabwe-born left-hander, who estimated the English total was worth about 50 more on the slow outfield.

"I'm sure a few guys would have liked to kick on from the starts they got, but they bowled well … and a few guys got a bit of time in the middle and will be relatively happy."

Bairstow, the only capped player of the three on parade, was immediately solid in defence, but even he played second fiddle to Graeme Swann (29) in their innings-high 49-run stand for the seventh wicket, symptomatic of the team's issues in last week's disastrous first Test match.

Herrick bowled well without luck for the hosts, but West Australian giant Mackin returned the best figures of 2-32 on a day of honest toil, rather than destruction.
By:
pxb
When: 29 Nov 13 20:34
DStyle, good analysis.

The expectation is for a flat slow wicket in Adelaide. Although I'm hoping for a fair amount of green and a bunch of early wickets.

Both sides would be satisfied with a draw. Eng to steady the ship, and Aus to maintain their lead going into Perth where they will have  the advantage.

Nathan Lyon is talking up his spin chances big time and he used to be the Adelaide groundsman.

All in all, promises to be a good match for draw trading. Starting with a draw lay.
Page 1 of 35  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 35 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com