Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 544 comments are related to the topic:
*** India Vs. Australia , 2nd ODI , Jaipur ***
*** India Vs. Australia , 2nd ODI , Jaipur ***
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 544
|
By:
yes bwcause they havent lost a wicket and theres less overs to get the rate
|
|
By:
india are flying here, I could be on for a big winner
|
|
By:
but they will lose a wicket
|
|
By:
Greame Smith in comedy stumping - 2 down back PAK to win free money
|
|
By:
tHEY still have 10 wickets in hand, they only need 298 more not 359.
|
|
By:
and that will coincide with a slowing of their scoring rate
|
|
By:
sora ur clueless on cricket u should stick to tennis.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Gotta feeling about this one.. could be a a real cracker.. am on INDIA atm
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
cricket is my most profitable sport, whereas you are rarely on the cricket forum, suggesting you rarely bet on it.
|
|
By:
even Grantcking knows this is an unlikely chase
|
|
By:
did i say it was around the corner, i was replying to some1 who asked why the odds had shortened on india from the change of innings.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Layed AUS average @1.33
|
|
By:
I will judge it at 25 overs.
|
|
By:
anyone who is on Aussies at this stage and panics deserves to lose.
|
|
By:
press 123 if u think sora is totally clueless at cricket.
|
|
By:
123
|
|
By:
55555555555555555555
|
|
By:
Kallis departs for a duck ( just keeping you posted guys )
|
|
By:
right im not getting greedy here, have greened out, +500 either side
|
|
By:
cheers carshark
|
|
By:
*cardshark
|
|
By:
Time to stick a big wedge on India as crazy as that sounds - AUS haven't got the bowling to defend any total on the deck....
|
|
By:
Morning BJ,
BJT 16 Oct 13 13:56 Oct 16, 2013 -- 1:52PM, Whisperingdeath wrote: I concur SecondComing,But some of the Aussie batsmen made Haddin look top notch this summer! Give me a break. The total run scorers had 5/6 Aussies did it not? Only Bell did better with the bat than most of the Aussie team. Short memories. That was not aimed at baiting you but seeing as you took it let me get back to your statistical argument and my lies, damned lies and statistics..... Aussies had 5/6 top run scorers? but still lost 3-0? 1302 of their runs were scored in 2 drawn tests 1433 runs were scored in 3 losing test matches. One of those losing test matches, the wicket at Lords was a road. I am not sure what your point is but to me the Australian batting lost them the Ashes even with 5/6 top run scorers. Haddin looked a composed batsman compared to Hughes, Khawaja, Cowan and even Watson at times. Paine is a very good batsman and I think will add to the Aussie team, which, is finally starting to take shape but injuries to fast bowlers and lack of a top class spinner will do for them again this winter. |
|
By:
I think this is a realistic chase, 2 settled batsmam, quality batsman, fire power to come, no terrors on deck, frontline bowlers all being used, lightening out field, no sixers yet to be hit in the chase, but still going along sweetly, it's not rocket science, they just need to paddle around watson and doherty, job done.
|
|
By:
The Aussies only lost wickets to run-outs and slogs - without run-outs they would have been 350/3
|
|
By:
b enefit of the doubt for me
|
|
By:
too close to call, not out!
|
|
By:
correct decision by a whisker !
|
|
By:
and the crowd go wild
 |
|
By:
spinners drying them
|
|
By:
RR very manageable at the moment
|
|
By:
Openers have done their job here already - into bonus country soon....
|
|
By:
batting paradise. i could make a double ton on there.
|
|
By:
only just turned it on but id have india favs here, anyone agree?
|
|
By:
they be favs when they get to 200 and havent lost too many wickets. long way to go.
|
|
By:
erm no liam |
|
By:
oh right fair enough, I do kind of fancy them though lads
|
