|
By:
umps being bought is not a conspiracy. but we have to treat it as such and tiptoe around the issue and give umps the 'benefit of the doubt' and all that cr@p. so sad. this world is so fake and gay.
no person that is straight could give that khawaja out surely with benefit of tech? to me, that decision was like seeing a car on the screen and the ump tried to tell us that it was a tree. and now we are actually entertaining the notion that it could be a friggin tree like the good sheep we are. ffs. |
|
By:
Dharamsena doing more to ensure no draw than cronje in the 5th test in centurian
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63864.html |
|
By:
|
|
By:
......BJTs seethometer still showing extreme levels
![]() |
|
By:
Just watch. Clark will leave one down leg side for 4 byes soon, and be given out on review...... Can't go any other way than Eng win here.
Already decided weeks ago.... |
|
By:
Is Spartan a big cricket goods manufacturer in Australia?
|
|
By:
4? Or review?
|
|
By:
Could have come off the wicket and the bail bounced back on? Surprised he is still out there tbh....
![]() |
|
By:
umps being bought is not a conspiracy. but we have to treat it as such and tiptoe around the issue and give umps the 'benefit of the doubt' and all that cr@p. so sad. this world is so fake and gay.
------ ![]() |
|
By:
unfortunately i fear pokeron is right.
|
|
By:
Apparantly, ignorance really is bliss.....
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Broad should have appealed there
![]() |
|
By:
BJT 01 Aug 13 11:14
Any chance of an opinion without a personal attack????? Didn't think so. johnnyrant 01 Aug 13 12:57 Eng had no end of terrible decisions during Oz's reign. BJT 01 Aug 13 12:58 Good call dickhead... Now who's getting personal? ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
"umps being bought is not a conspiracy"
pokeron, two people can conspire to change the outcome of a match, or result, hence it is a conspiracy. But, as a wrote before, I don't think that is the case. |
|
By:
i think the english were too embarrassed to appeal for the rogers near miss there....
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
10-0 10-0 10-0 10-0!!!!!!!
|
|
By:
shiraz i mean its a fact that umps are bought. it's not some 'crazy conspiracy'.
you read it the wrong way... |
|
By:
Unfortunately the 3rd umpires in this series don't seem to be able to see what 99.99% of the rest of us can see
00.01% Ya makin the farkwits on here feel roooolly special ![]() |
|
By:
anyone in here SIMMERING right now??
|
|
By:
Now who's getting personal?
The bloke's a DICKHEAD. It's a fact, not an unflattering opinion. ![]() |
|
By:
SMOLDERING with fury
![]() |
|
By:
i mean, its not some 'crazy conspiracy theory' rather....
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
BJT are you FUMING?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
there you go grant, although to 'blow one's stack' I find appealing.
|
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
it's not a conspiracy. the problem is the clear evidence to overturn thing. it makes a reversal an implicit criticism of the umpires on the field, who the guy knows and who will probably be making a similar decision about him in the future.
in that circumstance their idea of what constitutes reasonable doubt gets skewed. |
|
By:
draws come in well, now the fav
|
|
By:
Let's be honest here it looked a poor decision to give him out but.........if the 3rd umpire isn't entirely sure then he goes with the on field umpires call. So it's out.
If there was no DRS (and plenty are saying we might as well do away with it) then he'd have also been out. Aussies have still made a decent start here anyway. |
|
By:
Fair enough, just that I had used the word conspiracy prior to your post and thought you may have been referring to that.
We can only hope that there are no more mistakes made for the rest of the series, although the odds are against it. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
If there was no DRS
.......... then he'd have also been out.DRS isn't the problem.......it's the dopey carnt in the third umpire's box...............CAPEEEESH???? |
|
By:
I heard a noise
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Lets go the third umpire BJT..may be they can decide if that was an opinion or a personal attack or both
![]() |