Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 67 comments are related to the topic:
Sussex v Warwickshire
Sussex v Warwickshire
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 67
|
By:
warwickshire need to forget about bowling rankin. His pies are getting smashed all over the place. No point having pace if you have no idea how to use it. Game looks like it will be decided by how the warwickshire spinners bowl.
|
|
By:
Wet ball..i am not sure spinners would be of any effect...lets see..
|
|
By:
not sure why you'd bowl piolet rather than another spinner after seeing patel cause problems previous over.
|
|
By:
it looks like a sussex win tbh, glad we got the opportunity to trade out. 1.52 lay on ssx, 1.7 lay on wwr, still around £60 more green on wwr so worth watching to the end.
|
|
By:
joyce gawnnn
|
|
By:
GRANT!!!
|
|
By:
wright gawnn!
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
got to fancy sussex here still. 2 overs PP to come, as well as overs from wright and rankin. Warwickshire need another wicket or 2 relatively quickly, or to get the RRR up to near 10.
|
|
By:
Sussex should win this but this would be close
|
|
By:
40/30 with 6 wickets in hand and 2 pp overs. Should be a doddle.
|
|
By:
yardy gawnn!
|
|
By:
Brave who you on??
|
|
By:
warwickshire mate. yourself?
|
|
By:
Yup warwickshire..
 |
|
By:
last 2 overs brought them back into this massively. 34/18. They have to attack the next over as it's the last pp one. I've taken my stake back, but leaving green all with warwickshire.
|
|
By:
back into it they are 2/5 favs!
|
|
By:
sussex were 1/5 before those 2 overs. Undoing the good work now though.
|
|
By:
Equal green on both...10 quids more on sussexx
|
|
By:
pp done, 24 needed off 12. Wright and Ranking to finish you'd think.
|
|
By:
blackbarn 30 May 13 20:44 Joined: 02 Jan 05 | Topic/replies: 2,894 | Blogger: blackbarn's blog
but* most of Sussex on at 3.2. Rate reply: | report block user Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Another TV game  |
|
By:
gsm warwickshire, who'd have thunk it
|
|
By:
18 of 6..3 6s...wait this is not IPL
|
|
By:
Biggest over this innings was 15..
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
grant - I thunk it at 20.44. Its SUSSEX ffs.
|
|
By:
What were Sussex doing with that batting order
|
|
By:
Just doing what Sussex regularly do in televised fixtures - keep the match-winners locked in the hutch until they've ensured the match is effectively lost.
I won small on the game, but didn't lay Sussex anything like as heavily as I should have in the closing stages because I was fearful of Chris Jordan turning the game around in a couple of deliveries. Of course, Sussex demoted him to number 9 and didn't let him near the crease until they needed 12 from 2 balls. Even then he hit the first ball for 4. |