Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 441 comments are related to the topic:
MASSIVE MASSIVE VALUE!!!! Saffers vs pakis 1st test

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 9 of 12  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 441
By:
ICANTSTANDTHISFORUM
When: 02 Feb 13 11:29
ts a dark, dark place to be...

Keep your chin up mate  !
By:
ayt
When: 02 Feb 13 11:29
444444444444
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:29
i have no disciplin (i cant even spell it), so in effect cant win long term... and b) have no staking plan..
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:31
going to avoid the FO I reckon
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:31
hahah does that make him top run scorer?LaughLaugh
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:31
gone!
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:33

Feb 2, 2013 -- 11:29AM, kingmax wrote:


i have no disciplin (i cant even spell it), so in effect cant win long term... and b) have no staking plan..


sit down mate after this.  Don't bet for a few weeks at least and take stock.  Look at what you do well, what doesn't work and formulate a plan.  THEN... test it with small stakes.... see how you get on.

By:
Footiefan111
When: 02 Feb 13 11:33
Pakistan 1st innings     R     M     B     4s     6s     SR
View dismissal     Mohammad Hafeez     c †de Villiers b Steyn     6     14     14     1     0     42.85
View dismissal     Nasir Jamshed     lbw b Steyn     2     25     15     0     0     13.33
View dismissal     Azhar Ali     c †de Villiers b Kallis     13     81     46     2     0     28.26
View dismissal     Younis Khan     c Smith b Steyn     0     5     5     0     0     0.00
View dismissal     Misbah-ul-Haq*     c †de Villiers b Kallis     12     77     45     3     0     26.66
View dismissal     Asad Shafiq     c †de Villiers b Philander     1     17     5     0     0     20.00
View dismissal     Sarfraz Ahmed†     c †de Villiers b Steyn     2     28     13     0     0     15.38
View dismissal     Umar Gul     c Smith b Philander     0     2     2     0     0     0.00
View dismissal     Saeed Ajmal     c †de Villiers b Steyn     1     10     10     0     0     10.00
    Junaid Khan     not out     8         14     2     0     57.14
View dismissal     Rahat Ali     c du Plessis b Steyn     0         6     0     0     0.00
    Extras     (lb 3, w 1)     4                    
                       
    Total     (10 wickets; 29.1 overs)     49     (1.68 runs per over)
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:34
lowest ever PAK total!
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:35
i have a question for the % stake plan people....

lets say you bet 2% bank per trade... is that it for the whole trade/game... say lay 2% @ 1.5, wicket goes down now 1.25? would you lay another 2% or do you only allow 2% say for the whole match?
By:
ICANTSTANDTHISFORUM
When: 02 Feb 13 11:35
Feb 2, 2013 -- 11:29AM, kingmax wrote:


    i have no disciplin (i cant even spell it), so in effect cant win long term... and b) have no staking plan..


sit down mate after this.  Don't bet for a few weeks at least and take stock.  Look at what you do well, what doesn't work and formulate a plan.  THEN... test it with small stakes.... see how you get on.

Execellent advice.
By:
ICANTSTANDTHISFORUM
When: 02 Feb 13 11:38
i have a question for the % stake plan people....

lets say you bet 2% bank per trade... is that it for the whole trade/game... say lay 2% @ 1.5, wicket goes down now 1.25? would you lay another 2% or do you only allow 2% say for the whole match?

I trade with more than 2 % of my bank - say 20 % , and 2 % of my bank is the max that I am prepared to lose in a game.Look for slow,steady compound growth of your bank.Don't look for the big home run - It will decimate your bank.
By:
ICANTSTANDTHISFORUM
When: 02 Feb 13 11:40
You can also average your stake into a game - say 0.25 % per trade.
By:
Footiefan111
When: 02 Feb 13 11:41
are they follow on or bat
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:41
why are they batting again?
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:41
Not enforced FO - I can see the logic here.
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:41
id love a SA collapse here...
By:
ICANTSTANDTHISFORUM
When: 02 Feb 13 11:41
SA bat.
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:42

Feb 2, 2013 -- 11:41AM, kingmax wrote:


id love a SA collapse here...


Can't see it but would be interesting

By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:42
23 all out... 6 wicket 1st overLaugh
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:44
SA treat this like an ODI I reckon and declare 10 overs before close of play.
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:45
na they will declare overnight... think they will want 400 still
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:46

Feb 2, 2013 -- 11:45AM, kingmax wrote:


na they will declare overnight... think they will want 400 still


We'll see.  Going to be interesting.  I still think FO was more sensible mind.

By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:47
even 120 all out would be fun
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 11:48

Feb 2, 2013 -- 11:47AM, kingmax wrote:


even 120 all out would be fun


agreed

By:
peckerdunne
When: 02 Feb 13 11:48
Super honesty Kingmax, foolish too,have we not all tried it and failed miserably.

IF YOU DONT WRITE IT DOWN IT WONT HAPPEN...PLAN PLAN PLAN....
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:50
have faith guys... SA will be 100 all out.... then the fun begins
By:
peckerdunne
When: 02 Feb 13 11:52
BANGA BASH IS F IN CRAAAAZZZZZEEEEEE
By:
kingmax
When: 02 Feb 13 11:55
i know it sounds stupid, but i think by SA batting they bring the draw into play... hard to score on... day 5 washout... leaves pak 1 /12 days to bat it out
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 12:01

Feb 2, 2013 -- 11:55AM, kingmax wrote:


i know it sounds stupid, but i think by SA batting they bring the draw into play... hard to score on... day 5 washout... leaves pak 1 /12 days to bat it out


they do.  Hence why I'm convinced they will go hard today and declare before close.

By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 12:02
always go easy for first few overs with new ball then attack
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 12:02
lead of 450 will be more than enough.
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 12:29
smithy going for the ton - reckon that might have also been a factor in NOT enforcing the FO.
By:
rob_dylan
When: 02 Feb 13 12:29
Sporting spreads go 19-22 for first wkt dismissal index... Ie every run over fifty partnership is a point.  Seems v.v. Generous, have I misunderstood the rules?  Hope not as I have £5 a run on it.
By:
rob_dylan
When: 02 Feb 13 12:30
21-24 now
By:
tonyf
When: 02 Feb 13 12:47
you misunderstood, it is based on whether the dismissal is a catch, bowled, etc
By:
rob_dylan
When: 02 Feb 13 12:48
Just realised tonyf.  Catastrophically show.  Oh well, you live and learn.  Bllox.
By:
rob_dylan
When: 02 Feb 13 12:49
Just hope next wicket isnt caught.  Ffs.
By:
rob_dylan
When: 02 Feb 13 12:51
I clicked on the info thing, and said any runs over 50, but I mistakenly hit the 50up tab for Smith runs.  Wanna get my money back now but that is bad business, will have to just take it on the chin, but fair chance I lose a ton now.
By:
nigelpm1
When: 02 Feb 13 12:51
RTFR!!!
Page 9 of 12  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com