Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 441 comments are related to the topic:
MASSIVE MASSIVE VALUE!!!! Saffers vs pakis 1st test
MASSIVE MASSIVE VALUE!!!! Saffers vs pakis 1st test
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 441
|
By:
Did wonder why the market wasnt increasing, if something is too good to be true it usually is. No complaints here, my own stupid fault,
|
|
By:
What does that mean nigel?
|
|
By:
market finally waking up to the fact that PAK can't win this
|
|
By:
I thought I had nigel. Like I say I take it on the chin, the only way to take it. But who hasnt made a daft mistake like that in their betting career?
|
|
By:
only joking mate
 |
|
By:
I would love to blame someone, but i have only myself to blame.
 |
|
By:
tell you what, Draw could look an amazing lay in the low teens if it happens
|
|
By:
hopefully smith'l charge and get stumped. lol. ... or a run out.
|
|
By:
Now I have to keep an eye on this match, which is generally devoid of betting opportunities, just to see how the next wicket falls.
|
|
By:
Bowled or lbw would do, and far from beyond the realms of possibility.
|
|
By:
bowled / lbw +130
run out / stumped / hit wicket +380 caught -105 ooooo 2 lbw shouts.... lol.. |
|
By:
obstruction +380...
 markets seem dead. might switch over and watch us probably lose to ireland.  |
|
By:
shame you hadnt done 1st wicket stand. 101-106... unlucky.
|
|
By:
That is what i thought i was backing, but 50ups on first wicket stand.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Agree with lanza
|
|
By:
has any team EVER batted for 3 days?
|
|
By:
A pleasing day. You can always rely on Pakistan.
 |
|
By:
Well I didn't expect that!
My Pakistani friend did allude to a crap batting performance first time out but I didn't figure him for Mystic Meg. In hind sight I should have taken 1.70 when it was available as a couple of wickets from Steyn and Philander were to be expected but not 7 by lunch! I think Smith will want 600. He is overly cautious but Force 10 from Navarone wouldn't be able to stop play long enough for a draw! Some days ve vin, some days ve lose. Today ve lose! Lucky I don't trust Pakistan too much so £92 isn't going to bust my sphincter. |
|
By:
600!!!!!!!!!! Rubbish
|
|
By:
Declare with about 480-500 lead
|
|
By:
600 is only two sessions batting. He will certainly give the current pair a chance of making centuries and then bif bash Faf will have a tonk. 400 might prove more than enough already but no way in hell will he declare with a lead of 480. You my friend are dreaming. He will let his bowlers expand the cracks and continue to rough up the wicket.
A declaration at lunch leaves Pakistan 2 sessions on a day 3 pitch which potentially leaves then around 320 to get over days 4 and 5. Agreed unlikely but he wont give them a sniff will Smith. |
|
By:
I reckon he'll leave PAK 550 to get which will probably be done just after lunch. Draw highly unlikely but still a hugely outside shout if rains sweep in.
PAK cannot win this and 65 is a good value bet to lay IMHO. |
|
By:
still not sure why smith didn't enforce ,I know you might say he wants his bowlers fresh ,but they only bowled 29 overs , by enforcing the follow on, it takes any issue of when to declare out of the equation and also means you might not even need to bat again
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
indeed nigel ...that is if you need to bat a second time at all
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Going to declare before lunch I reckon
|
|
By:
when Amla reaches 100
|
|
By:
Definitely. Around a lead of 550. Market finally getting it - PAK out >100. Draw still a chance though - a lot of rain monday and tuesday now if PAK keep their heads.
|
|
By:
declared!
|
|
By:
as expected, I said 480-500, read above
|
|
By:
true, but the rest was spot on, some way from 550 and the guy who said 600
|
|
By:
not much point posting my views as just seem to get negative comments, so bye, find me on twitter if you want
|