Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 325 comments are related to the topic:
INDIA vs ENGLAND (4TH ODI)
INDIA vs ENGLAND (4TH ODI)
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 325
|
By:
should be not out
|
|
By:
haha what an idiot..
|
|
By:
what a t1t he is
 |
|
By:
serves him right, learn how to bowl
|
|
By:
Go away Cook you ****wit. The rule was made purely for this goose and your retard team that doesn't know where the stumps are.
|
|
By:
next ball is a boundry
|
|
By:
Cook should be fined hard for that.
|
|
By:
england win from here it is certain
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Well ****, call it off and pay everybody out. Morse has spoken.
|
|
By:
lmao
|
|
By:
Finn 1 over left. Needs to claim 3 in that over, or it will be very tough for the others.
|
|
By:
the law, not "rule" BJT, is about distracting the batsmen.
i think if raina had appealed the decision then it would be correct to call it dead, much in the same way that i don't think it should be caled dead if the batman smears him for 4. it's about hindrance, and in that instance raina hadn't even noticed. |
|
By:
that's exactly where walt is wrong.
it is up to the batsman to decide what a distraction is. they are the ones being distracted or not ffs. |
|
By:
Its about learning how to bowl and stop disrupting the play. It was stated that the bails come off, it is a dead ball, regardless of anything else. That is it.
|
|
By:
If he was hit for 6 it still would have been a dead ball. Has nothing to do with hinderance at all. How can you claim a batsmen was distracted by something and hit it for 6?
|
|
By:
It should be a no ball, straight up. Batsmen gets runs and protects his wicket. No bowler over the age of 3 should be so uncoordinated to run into the stumps on their run up. It is ridiculous.
|
|
By:
if he hits it for 6 it will be called a dead ball if he does the same again
|
|
By:
well that's not in the law. that's merely the interpretation of the rule as it applies to finn. i would argue that it's a poor interpretation.
but given that he knows that how it's going to be interpreted, you are right, it should stop doing it. |
|
By:
interpretation of the law (ffs - you've got me doing it now)
|
|
By:
Is a simple case of the bowler is the one ****g up, so he should be the only one penalised for that delivery. The only way that happens is if it is a no ball.
|
|
By:
why would Cook dispute the decision with the umpire?
|
|
By:
Because he was desperate and knew none of his other bowlers will be able to get a wicket?
|
|
By:
At the start of this series they stated every time it happened, dead ball. Previous to that I think they got a warning first. My guess, is that he was appealing that they didn't get a warning, and therefore it was unfair to take the wicket off them.
At a guess. |
|
By:
As for the rest, unless every time somebody goes out they look to the stumps at the bowlers end ready to complain they were distracted, it is easier just to have a no grey area rule. Stumps off, done deal. Dead ball not the right way, but black and white certainly is. As DStyle suggested, interpretations of rules aren't a good thing. (Paraphrasing, and maybe didn't state exactly as you would have liked). Unless of course it is consistant. Which in this case, it certainly is.
|
|
By:
looks like u get all ur profit BJT , rewarded for having the nerve not to lay off , tricky one that , every trader has that issue , to lay off or not , lol
|
|
By:
Losing your bank couldn't happen to a more irritating bloke Morse. You are the only person I would ever be saying this to, but I am happy you went broke.
And I say that knowing full well that you probably haven't put a bet on here since day 1 when you lost the lot. |
|
By:
Should just call it a no ball, a run to the batsman and if he scores runs he gets them and if he is out he is given not out.
|
|
By:
wonder where the problem might be.....
ST Finn 10 1 39 1 3.90 TT Bresnan 8 1 48 1 6.00 JW Dernbach 7 0 50 0 7.14 SR Patel 3 0 21 0 7.00 JC Tredwell 8 0 42 2 5.25 JE Root 3 0 13 0 4.33 |
|
By:
this is a protest from cook here imho.
|
|
By:
I would suspect Morse was betting on India!
|
|
By:
dernbach gets dhoni , ur kidding me
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
News Update
Morse remortgages caravan to add to holdings on England! |
|
By:
Just woke up. Fcuk my eyes are sore.
Is morse broke again. Not another bank. ECB aint in it. |
|
By:
Please, as if his grandmother would let a degenerate like him mortgage her caravan. No doubt she lives in there with him and sees his posts on here.
|
|
By:
Interesting punditry from Colly
He thinks Dhoni's bandage has affected his tossing, some might say that tossing has effected a bandage! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
interesting strike rates over in corruption league.
|
|
By:
a bowler disturbing the stumps on delivery should be given a no ball , so any runs accruing from that delivery count
|