Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 121
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 12:36

May 29, 2020 -- 12:32PM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:


Excess deaths should be negative already because of the lickdownAs detailed above


How many lives do you think lockdown will ultimately save/cost?

By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 12:37
Off at tangent

..... Zzzzzzz
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 May 20 12:37
insider having a shocker on multiple threads at the same time, he,s not hancock is he Laugh
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 12:40
If you kept lockdown then excess deaths would turn negative

There is no doubt of that.


When virus is purged you can open more quickly
with more confidence
And economy will have more of a v recovery.



Dribs and drabs before we are ready purely to deflect Cummings wife's birthday treat risks harming a v recivery
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 12:43

May 29, 2020 -- 12:40PM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:


If you kept lockdown then excess deaths would turn negativeThere is no doubt of that. When virus is purged you can open more quickly with more confidenceAnd economy will have more of a v recovery. Dribs and drabs before we are ready purely to deflect Cummings wife's birthday treat risks harming a v recivery


You think the longer we are in lockdown with limited access to health care, dental care, mental health benefits for social interaction etc.. the more lives that will be saved?

By:
darren_discombobulates_sports
When: 29 May 20 12:44
it's not about right at all because we literally have no clear figures whatsoever on the actual number of people who have died from Covid-19, the calculation and reporting of the deaths are seriously ambiguous, the term Corona Virus 'related' deaths is a nonsense, we need actual numbers, how many people have died from this virus either directly, or the cause given as 'highly likely' it having a significant impact on death. But even then it needs breaking down further, how many were near the end of the lives with already serious health issues where even the common winter flu could have killed them. How many were health workers with little or no PPE frequently over exposed.

A blanket number of people dying simply including people who had died with the virus is cowboy stuff, you'd expect this kind analytical summation delivered to the nation and accepted with challenge by a country like North Korea.

Also, numbers of people who die from knife crime in the UK every year is around 250, very small numbers, and these crimes happen generally in poor areas, firstly you need to know how many people so far have died anyway from this crime so far this year to draw a comparison and secondly, poor areas have suffered consequently from the lockdown regardless in other ways, less likely to have laptops to study from home.

Air pollution deaths do not happen in short spurts, it is attributed to a cause of death based on lifetime exposure, we've been in partial lockdown for a few weeks.

Research has also shown 8.6 million drinking more frequently due to lockdown (alcoholchange.uk)

Calls to the National Domestic abuse helpline has also in creased by 66%.

60, 000 is just a completely random made up number. I know you really don't like this government but this isn't about politics and you shouldn't make it political to score points, the Covid-19 death numbers are simply not real.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 12:46

May 29, 2020 -- 12:37PM, 1st time poster wrote:


insider having a shocker on multiple threads at the same time, he,s not hancock is he


Strange that. All the science that is coming out suggests more and more that social distancing and good hygiene is the key.

Norway admitted this and their lockdown was pointless.

Sweden doing better than us without lockdown.

The list goes on.

The reality is the R rate was falling massively pre-lockdown.

By:
darren_discombobulates_sports
When: 29 May 20 12:46
Then we have the scandal of elderly being pressurised into signing Do Not Resuscitate forms.
By:
dave1357
When: 29 May 20 12:46
oh more aftertiming by insider trader
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 12:47

May 29, 2020 -- 12:46PM, dave1357 wrote:


oh more aftertiming by insider trader


Been saying the same thing since early April. Almost two months as the more and more damage has been done.

By:
dave1357
When: 29 May 20 12:52
There was no medical consensus in "early april" that children were at low risk of passing the virus to other children and adults.
By:
dave1357
When: 29 May 20 12:56
You also misrepresent norway's position.  They said that lockdown was a overreaction because R was low, not that lockdown in itself was wrong.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 13:03

May 29, 2020 -- 12:56PM, dave1357 wrote:


You also misrepresent norway's position.

By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 29 May 20 13:04

May 29, 2020 -- 12:10PM, darren_discombobulates_sports wrote:


It's an idea for the older children and workable, for nursery kids yes more difficult, maybe then can stay at home, not sure it's important for them to be there, much more important for year 6's.


Please explain why it's so important for year six kids to return.

By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 13:05

May 29, 2020 -- 12:52PM, dave1357 wrote:


There was no medical consensus in "early april" that children were at low risk of passing the virus to other children and adults.


If you are waiting for medical consensus on everything no one would ever do anything ever.

By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 13:07

May 29, 2020 -- 1:04PM, PorcupineorPineapple wrote:


May 29, 2020 -- 11:10AM, darren_discombobulates_sports wrote:It's an idea for the older children and workable, for nursery kids yes more difficult, maybe then can stay at home, not sure it's important for them to be there, much more important for year 6's.Please explain why it's so important for year six kids to return.


Its important that everyone returns. They should never have stopped going.

By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 29 May 20 13:18
That wasn't the question.


The government- in its infinite wisdom - decided reception, y1 and y6 should be first. Forumites here agree the trauma of being faced with a covered up teacher ordering them to stay apart might not be in the best interests of young children.

But I'm asking why Darren thinks it's so important y6 pupils go back. They will face the same restrictions once there, are missing out on no work as they are being taught at home and y6 final term is a notorious doddle anyway.

You can argue (whether rightly or wrongly) as to what should and shouldn't have been done, but the question pertains to returning and managing that properly. The government are balling this up, just as they've done pretty much everything else.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 13:22
I don't want to lockdown for longer than required

I want recovery to be swift



You just are so short sighted you will stall any recovery whilst culling more brits.



These whack job threads you start promoting ill-conceived ideas are just bonkers
By:
darren_discombobulates_sports
When: 29 May 20 13:32
year 6's need preparation for big school, this includes taking end of Keys Stage 2 SATS tests, which are used to assess a child's current academic le level/progress, they're also used to measure progress from end of KS1 tests, secondary schools need to know these results.

I am working on the assumption they will still take place, they were due to take place 3 weeks ago.

Nursey kids have goldfish memories, they're not really there to learn much, more to learn other basic skills such as interaction and general behaviour skills.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 13:37
Sats are cancelled

Year 1 and 2 tests are cancelled

Phonics tests cancelled
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 13:40
Not allowed to play rounders, but maybe quoits will be allowed
if kids bring their own


Nursery have been stripped of all toys

Sand pits are cordoned off, no water play.
By:
darren_discombobulates_sports
When: 29 May 20 13:49
still they need mental preparation for secondary school, to go from the oldest kids in the school to the youngest in a much bigger environment, do not really see the purpose of nursey kids returning or at least being more important that year 6's.
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 29 May 20 13:50

May 29, 2020 -- 1:32PM, darren_discombobulates_sports wrote:


year 6's need preparation for big school, this includes taking end of Keys Stage 2 SATS tests, which are used to assess a child's current academic le level/progress, they're also used to measure progress from end of KS1 tests, secondary schools need to know these results.I am working on the assumption they will still take place, they were due to take place 3 weeks ago.Nursey kids have goldfish memories, they're not really there to learn much, more to learn other basic skills such as interaction and general behaviour skills.


SATS tests are gone. May take place in the Autumn if they see any value of still doing them. They will literally be going back to piss around for six weeks and be told off for going too close to each other.

See, if the argument was that GCSE's and A-levels were important therefore third, fourth and upper sixth (not sure what current equivalent is) had to attend safely spaced out classes for revision and then halls for exams then at least there's some logic in that. Similarly, if the proposal was for Y6 pupils to safely visit their secondary school for a couple of open days then there's sense there.


This is just pointless. Just virtue signalling to say "schools are back" without thinking about why they're back. This government just hasn't got a clue.

By:
1st time poster
When: 29 May 20 13:51
its nothing to do with education,its about getting kids baby sat so parents can return to work ,as to why youngest returning 1st,no benefit to government older ones going back and younger ones still need minding at home
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 May 20 13:53
my grandson,s teacher phoned last week his dad said I,ll think about and let you no ,but think not,
teacher said I,ll ring back next week ,which was wed,,she said you havnt got a choice no parents agreeing to come so we,re not opening
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 13:54
Year 6s not having chance to bully younger kids is not going to be missed.

Maybe that will help prepare them better for big school.
By:
Fire-and-Ice
When: 29 May 20 13:57
You having flashbacks Donny?
By:
impossible123
When: 29 May 20 13:59
I think it was a stupid comparison, why? One can see lightning before it strikes, but with Covid-19 one cannot. It's invisible thus scares the daylight out of any joe public; one could catch it from contact with an infected object or area where an asymptomatic carrier has just been.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 14:12

May 29, 2020 -- 1:53PM, 1st time poster wrote:


my grandson,s teacher phoned last week his dad said I,ll think about and let you no ,but think not,teacher said I,ll ring back next week ,which was wed,,she said you havnt got a choice no parents agreeing to come so we,re not opening


Where is that? At my niece's school 3 parents did not want their kids going back because a family member was on the vulnerable list. All the other kids were jumping at the chance of going back and seeing their friends.

By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 29 May 20 14:12
That was our experience 1tp. Had to fill in loads of surveys from the school about what we'd do. Wife's in a parents' whatsapp group and at the first time of asking there were eight kids from thirty going back. This reduced to five the next week. School basically said it wasn't worth their while opening and decided to carry on their childminding key workers' kids service.

This was then overtaken by Lancashire Council stating that the five government tests couldn't be met given current positions on testing and PPE, so advised all schools to remain closed and not to take any more key workers' kids, but just stay with what they've got.


Was a stupid, half baked plan to begin with but any goodwill or trust in the government to look after our kids has been utterly trashed in recent days. Just another big failure from them.
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 May 20 14:14
north east redcar
By:
Dotchinite
When: 29 May 20 14:17
Why not move the Summer holidays to June 1st through to mid July and then go back fully after that.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 14:22
Maybe folk have plans so moving holidays at this late stage is impossible in reality
By:
Dotchinite
When: 29 May 20 14:27
Cant imagine hardly anyone has holidays booked at the moment but im sure the teachers would use that as another excuse.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 14:30
You would be surprise if you speak to teachers they have holidays booked
Parents of kids have holidays booked.

We might get to enjoy so time in uk over the summer, on holiday
Helping to seed the recovery
By:
Dotchinite
When: 29 May 20 14:34
I suppose the other alternative is to furlough them if they dont want to go back. Thankfully our supermarket staff and NHS workers are made of stronger stuff or we would be in trouble.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 29 May 20 14:45
Teachers are still working in schools with key workers kids, whilst home schooling others on Internet.

Stern stuff indeed

Whilst fighting to protect NHS from another government sponsored flare up
By:
impossible123
When: 29 May 20 14:49
I think kids whose parent/s share a house or live with grandparents esp those in the NHS or key workers would consider returning to school on 1st June a risk too difficult to weigh up or justify. And, I believe there could be quite a few.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 29 May 20 14:58

May 29, 2020 -- 2:49PM, impossible123 wrote:


I think kids whose parent/s share a house or live with grandparents esp those in the NHS or key workers would consider returning to school on 1st June a risk too difficult to weigh up or justify. And, I believe there could be quite a few.


They can stay home if they want and it makes sense in those cases.

By:
Dotchinite
When: 29 May 20 15:09
The ones around here dont appear to be doing that. The one who lives across from me is full time in his garden for a start and I
know of two who should be guaranteed a place but have hardly been allowed to go at all as the teachers keep in turn deciding they have a cold and need to isolate.
Either way now its Summer lets be decisive. Open them up or just close and save on the wage bill.
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com