Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
24 May 20
10:19
Joined:
Date Joined:
25 Aug 05
Unbelievable that we have a small minority of people who go running to Guardian at every turn.
Last year we had those champagne socialists recording Boris Johnson in his girlfriend's home and running to Guardian trying to stop him getting him elected leader.
Now we have a retired teacher thinking he saw Cummings out for a walk doing exercise grassing him up.
Someone else clearly phoned Durham Police to saying he had got into lockdown at his parents house.
What is wrong with this sticky beaks?
The politically motivated Guardian sat on this story for almost six weeks and pulled it out now.
Ask yourself who benefits?
It means the press are ignoring the big stories about the cost of lockdown and getting the government off the hook on that.
The press and are completely obsessed with this irrelevant story. Lockdown 'rules' were always about common sense. Millions of people have 'broken' them including members of the press not social distancing.
The super grasses and media should be ashamed of themselves.
Last year we had those champagne socialists recording Boris Johnson in his girlfriend's home and running to Guardian trying to stop him getting him elected leader.
Now we have a retired teacher thinking he saw Cummings out for a walk doing exercise grassing him up.
Someone else clearly phoned Durham Police to saying he had got into lockdown at his parents house.
What is wrong with this sticky beaks?
The politically motivated Guardian sat on this story for almost six weeks and pulled it out now.
Ask yourself who benefits?
It means the press are ignoring the big stories about the cost of lockdown and getting the government off the hook on that.
The press and are completely obsessed with this irrelevant story. Lockdown 'rules' were always about common sense. Millions of people have 'broken' them including members of the press not social distancing.
The super grasses and media should be ashamed of themselves.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 81
|
By:
Is this consistent with the view you took when The Telegraph splashed their belated revelations about Neil Ferguson ?
|
|
By:
That Steve Baker is a real leftie loon.
|
|
By:
Durham Police outed as deep-state leftists
|
|
By:
20 years of press doing it to the guys everyone else on here likes has been fine though
|
|
By:
what is out of step is downing street calling it a tissue of lies they wont comment on,before one by one admitting its true but giving ridiculous reasons on what they previously called lies ,was perfectly within the guidelines, they've so far labled the durham police,guardisn,observer,mirror,and 2 witnesses liars ,who do you think will be liars by 5 0 clock this afternoon
downing street hour by hour coming out with reasons why cummings did things they said never happened an hour before  |
|
By:
The remoaner left DESPISE cummings, as I said yesterday it's not rational, he's a mystical demonic figure for spitting hate amongst the islington set.
They are going to keep gunning for him. He helped cause brexit, and if you are yoghurt eating woke traitor at the BBC or Grauniad, that's as evil as a man can be.. |
|
By:
Government decided to make it a story by rallying around DC and later basically implying f the guidelines
sure plenty of us will still hate him but if it was purely a decision done out of love for his child etc, plenty of normies would have been fine with an apology |
|
By:
JC writing about behaviour not being rational then following it up with his usual unhinged rantings
|
|
By:
Who informed Durham Police?
What is wrong with people who insist on going running to Guardian and the police at every turn? If the Guardian thought is was in the public interest that should have put the story up immediately. Angoose I agree with you on Neil Ferguson. His lack of belief in his research by his actions not his words could have been made public in early April we could have potentially saved billions and many many lives. When someone goes against their own 'science' so clearly and is on the airwaves day in day out saying one thing and doing another that is in the public interest. Press sitting on that story was also a disgrace. |
|
By:
Are you losing the plot IT?
Do you think the press should not have reported on Fergusson’s Mistress turning up at his house or Calderwood visiting her second home? Is there a difference between Demonic Cummings hypocrisy and the other two? |
|
By:
"unhinged"?
The way the remonaer left went absoltute balistic because Cummings sat in on sage meetings a few weeks ago shows all you needc to know about how they are gunning for him and want his head on a spike. That is a methaphor aaron, before you make some pathetic childish trolling attempt to say I mean that literally, as is your level. A top advisor sitting in on an important metting that is not top secret is of course the most reasonable thing in the world. Any rational intelligent person can see that. Not to the cumming hate mobs though. They had their pitch forks sharpened. |
|
By:
the sound of right wing knicker elastic twanging is deafening this morning,glorious to hear
|
|
By:
if I had a big scoop about the Conservatives I would simply go to the outlets that would be most open to running the story
likewise Labour. you know who would prefer to run a hypocrisy story on them far more than others. People haven't been able to see kids/grandkids/ill people in hospital/go to funerals would have wanted to use common sense to do these things but decided to follow the guidelines, then see another person very important in government has not just decided to ignore them but then have half his mates at the top of the government defend him sitting on stories is nothing new, whether it is good IDK but 24 hour news cycle is often damaging for journalism. was pretty good baiting the terrible excuses and denials out of the Gov before dropping another story hours later though |
|
By:
"Is there a difference between Demonic Cummings hypocrisy and the other two? "
Of coure there is. The person at the absolute top of the hysteria demanding we a lockdown was knobbing someone's wife which requires intimate contact, totally optional and for fun. The other was going back to his home area to live in a house with his family so that they had wider family support as they were ill. In that house they had food parcels delivered. Which seems quite reasonable actually if they had no such support network for themselves and their child in London. |
|
By:
Just Checking • May 24, 2020 10:42 AM BST
"unhinged"? he's a mystical demonic figure for spitting hate amongst the islington set. They are going to keep gunning for him. He helped cause brexit, and if you are yoghurt eating woke traitor at the BBC or Grauniad, that's as evil as a man can be.. was a very weird post, need to try and solve those anger problems |
|
By:
Aah, IT. Interesting that you mention hypocrisy. Just after your opinion on the below:
May 23, 2020 -- 3:04PM, InsiderTrader wrote: politicspunter23 May 20 14:56 We all know cummings did nothing wrong and would all do the same, its all about the agenda.You must be almost the only person in the UK that thinks that.^PP defended the Scottish CMO when she went on a jolly to her holiday home.Some people who lost money because of Boris taking power seem to think protecting your family is the same thing as inviting a mistress over or going on holiday. Interesting line from IT here. Of course, when the forum was discussing Ferguson breaking the lockdown a couple of weeks ago, his attitude was slightly different. Even before he inspired the lockdown someone leaving a house where someone was thought to have the virus was unacceptable. In fact, that was his view. Leaving the house where some may have the virus was unacceptable back then. Of course now that it's his favourite unelected establishment figure it's "What is the problem?" No wonder this country's going to the dogs so quickly. |
|
By:
yes, unbelievable seething by the moronic right wing
|
|
By:
So he is still a hypocrite!
It is just the level of hypocrisy, brilliant. |
|
By:
aaron do you not realise how obvious and pathetic your trolling is? I mean you've been at this for years and never grow up. Do you think it's clever?
|
|
By:
like pretty much any political situation, DC will be brought down (or not) by his own party and the press that is favourable to him and the Conservatives and not the evil remainers and leftie activists
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Just Checking do you not realise how obvious and pathetic your trolling is? I mean you've been at this for years and never grow up. Do you think it's clever?
|
|
By:
It was his own father that let the cat out the bag. His father called the police asking about some security matter, and innocently told them that Dom was here.
|
|
By:
Cummings and wife are real nasty for using his child as the excuse for travel when they dressed their son up as a doctor and mads him take their temperatures when they were sick
 |
|
By:
Maybe his dad was a remoaner and wanted to get the Bstard
|
|
By:
Whisperingdeath
24 May 20 09:42 Joined: 25 Dec 11 | Topic/replies: 27,600 | Blogger: Whisperingdeath's blog Are you losing the plot IT? Do you think the press should not have reported on Fergusson’s Mistress turning up at his house or Calderwood visiting her second home? Is there a difference between Demonic Cummings hypocrisy and the other two? PorcupineorPineapple 24 May 20 09:49 Joined: 03 Dec 15 | Topic/replies: 9,600 | Blogger: PorcupineorPineapple's blog Aah, IT. Interesting that you mention hypocrisy. Just after your opinion on the below: May 23, 2020 -- 3:04PM, InsiderTrader wrote: politicspunter23 May 20 14:56 We all know cummings did nothing wrong and would all do the same, its all about the agenda.You must be almost the only person in the UK that thinks that.^PP defended the Scottish CMO when she went on a jolly to her holiday home.Some people who lost money because of Boris taking power seem to think protecting your family is the same thing as inviting a mistress over or going on holiday. Interesting line from IT here. Even before he inspired the lockdown someone leaving a house where someone was thought to have the virus was unacceptable. ^ Cummings choose to self-isolate in Durham with his support network. Cummings was not screaming in the press and on TV that everyone should be under house arrest. Ferguson produced his numbers. Influenced policy massively. Got himself in the media countless times. Whilst all the time having his married mistress over for presumably intimate contact. Culderwood was in the media daily telling people what to do like some kind of jumped up school teacher whilst all the time going on weekend jollies to her second home. |
|
By:
So - just to be sure - leaving the house whilst infected is now acceptable?
|
|
By:
Cummings doesn't say anything,attributable,to the press. He hides behind patsies like elected politicians and scientists.
|
|
By:
Nobody takes any notice of the media other than the already converted msn is dieing they are struggling to attract the youth some news papers have resorted to begging for donations and the BBC is meltdown over Netflix YouTube and Facebook in the next 10 years most of today's media will have gone
|
|
By:
I'd say quite a few people have been taking notice of the media in the last day or so to be fair.
|
|
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
24 May 20 10:02 Joined: 03 Dec 15 | Topic/replies: 9,601 | Blogger: PorcupineorPineapple's blog So - just to be sure - leaving the house whilst infected is now acceptable? ^ Infected? Or having symptoms? Clearly in some circumstance yes. |
|
By:
insider trade/cider must be either shapps,williamsonm,.hancock etc,
shut the fooook up your making yourself sound absolutely stupid trying to defend this shoite show, i |
|
By:
lol, just imagining in bizarro world where Seumas had been swanning up and down the country
would have been some insane posts on here |
|
By:
The only people taking any notice are the already converted mainly from the older generation
|
|
By:
And yet you said it was unacceptable just a few short weeks ago. How odd. What's changed I wonder.
|
|
By:
1st time poster
Date Joined: 25 Dec 05 Add contact | Send message 24 May 20 10:11 Joined: 25 Dec 05 | Topic/replies: 40,048 | Blogger: 1st time poster's blog insider trade/cider must be either shapps,williamsonm,.hancock etc, shut the fooook up your making yourself sound absolutely stupid trying to defend this shoite show, i ^ This is the level of debating from the haters. Shocking stuff. |
|
By:
this might be one of the first "Twitter isn't real life" things that the right falls on the wrong side of. they simply dismiss it as weird FBPE types on Twitter getting outraged when it is way more than that
|
|
By:
the last tory boy non story got 18months in chokey
|
|
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
24 May 20 10:13 Joined: 03 Dec 15 | Topic/replies: 9,603 | Blogger: PorcupineorPineapple's blog And yet you said it was unacceptable just a few short weeks ago. How odd. What's changed I wonder. ^ Surely you can see the difference between a married woman living her husband, who she thought had Covid, to travel across London to have presumably intimate contact with another man from a different household is different from choosing which private house to go to isolate as a household with symptoms. It is interesting the pro-EU types have no common sense interpretation of the guidance. |