|
By:
|
|
By:
And I suspect that you are well aware of the distinction.
|
|
By:
Sure Angoose.
But you get the general point. There are more cases now than before the lockdown started therefore if everyone was suddenly released we would get a bigger sudden spike than if we had let it spread with just social distancing. The reality is it is not 'safe' until we have a vaccine or cure. |
|
By:
That there are more confirmed cases now than before the lockdown was imposed is the nature of the beast.
And I'm not arguing a case for everyone to be suddenly released. There was an interesting interview on Sky News earlier with a health spokesman from New Zealand. He described how the New Zealand response quickly changed once they realised that you would fail if you tried to apply a flu like response. They quarantined ALL arrivals in to the country for a 14 day period. To date, they have 1,451 recorded cases and 14 recorded deaths. They have also tested 19,658 per million of population. The UK has tested 7,886 per million. As pointed out on this and other threads, making country by country comparisons is dangerous. There are many factors that required to be considered. |
|
By:
especially with a country like new zealand. it's a very sparsely populated country about 10 hours flight from anywhere else except Australia. it's the one time when their geographic isolation has been a benefit
in fact scott morrison is coming in for quite a bit of stick for continuing their strict Europe style lockdown. deaths still in single figures but 100s of 1000s of Australians out of a job |
|
By:
meant double figures for deaths in Australia. around 70 I think
|