Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 967 comments are related to the topic:
Climate Change

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 11 of 25  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ... | 25 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 967
By:
treetop
When: 18 Oct 19 19:14
For those dedicated to science, we should recall Science deemed the world was flat in 16th century and burned deniers,Science condemned witches and drowned deniers,Science deemed Thalidomide essential for pregnant mothers and laughed at deniers,Science in the name of Marietta Higgs deemed half of Middlesborough were child abusers and removed children from loving parents. It is not a bad thing to have a sense of scepticism when science rushes to hysterical extremes.
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Oct 19 19:20
And another day passes - over 40 posts

And surprise surprise none of the deniers has even attempted to answer the question from the 1st post and provide ANY evidence that tge planet's temperature is not increasing.

LOL at the shiny hat forum racist.

Don't quote wiki - quote David Icke (AKA tge son of God)
Classic science dropout quote.
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 19:29

Oct 18, 2019 -- 7:14PM, treetop wrote:


For those dedicated to science, we should recall Science deemed the world was flat in 16th century and burned deniers,Science condemned witches and drowned deniers,Science deemed Thalidomide essential for pregnant mothers and laughed at deniers,Science in the name of Marietta Higgs deemed half of Middlesborough were child abusers and removed children from loving parents. It is not a bad thing to have a sense of scepticism when science rushes to hysterical extremes.


So the world was flat but scientists proved it wasn't by using evidence. Science condemned witches and drowned deniers or maybe religion did that. Thalidomide was a mistake and relatively quickly corrected - nobody says scientists get everything right all of the time but they do learn from their mistakes. Middlsebrough was not scientists.

If you are saying climate change isn't happening put some evidence up not going back hundreds of years to try and find some slur on science.

By:
treetop
When: 18 Oct 19 19:35
Slavish acceptance of science when most of the research has been driving one way is not good,I have neither the time nor the inclination to get into a 6th form style of debate but will ALWAYS be sceptical of hysterical followers of a trend whether it is religion,climate change (or global warming or the environment as it once was) or football followers. We were pushed towards diesel only a short while ago.
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 19:37
Typical. No evidence.
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 19:43
My OP:
There seems to be no end of loonies on here denying climate change. Unfortunately, as yet I haven't seen any evidence forthcoming from them as to why it's not true.

There are plenty strawman arguments and glib remarks such as carbon dioxide is good for plants, the population of polar bears is increasing, the police are too soft on demonstrators, records only go back 40 years, ice has been crashing into the sea for hundreds of years,  it's a stealth tax, I can't see any change in my back garden and of course lots of comments about Greta. But no evidence.

So climate change deniers please post some evidence along with their sources to support your argument.


And still no evidence.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Oct 19 19:43
When is this climate change malarkey supposed to start kicking in again now the line has been pushed even further into the future?

The doomsters have already got egg on their faces over their last set of predictions that failed, so when can we start laughing at them again for being wrong?
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 19:47

Oct 18, 2019 -- 7:43PM, Dr Crippen wrote:


When is this climate change malarkey supposed to start kicking in again now the line has been pushed even further into the future? The doomsters have already got egg on their faces over their last set of predictions that failed, so when can we start laughing at them again for being wrong?


Come on Drippen try and find some evidence it ain't happening not just your normal bollocks.

By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Oct 19 19:52
Find your own evidence Charlie Drippin.

You're the one who's ready to fall for any f'cker you think is credible.

You can believe what you like. And we can laugh at you.
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 19:53
So no evidence just hot air as usual.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Oct 19 19:56
Haven't you realised yet they're all liars?

And they can get mugs like you to believe anything they want.
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 19:58
YOU ONLY HAVE 12 YEARS !!  SO LONG MUGS  - SUCK IT UP

I AM OFF OUT IN MY RED DRESS, RED HEELS AND WHITE PASTY GOTH MAKE UP

I AM ONE OF THE CROWD NOW

HAPPY UNDERGROUND TRAVELLING YOU FOOLS
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 19:58
You're just arguing for the sake of it. No evidence so you're looking dafter than you normally do which is some achievement.
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Oct 19 19:59
Charlie are you in favor of carbon tax?
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:00
ps have you noticed that nearly all of these commotions, science global warming are PREDICTIONS

predictions which rarel,if ever, come about

decades of them -

what happened to the geezer who said children in the uk would no longer see snow

1980 he said that I believe
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 20:02

Oct 18, 2019 -- 7:59PM, detraveller wrote:


Charlie are you in favor of carbon tax?


I don't care one way or the other.

By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:02
predictions which rarely  Doh!!!!

cardiff/sheff wed   still  0   0
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 20:02

Oct 18, 2019 -- 8:00PM, moisok wrote:


ps have you noticed that nearly all of these commotions, science global warming are PREDICTIONSpredictions which rarel,if ever, come aboutdecades of them -what happened to the geezer who said children in the uk would no longer see snow1980 he said that I believe


No evidence moisok just more bollocks.

By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:03
do yah get my drift - they ain't facts they are just fantasy - PREDICTIONS  - A bit like saying man utd will beat liverpool - that sort of prediction and doomed I say.
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:04
but look at the careers and jobs which have been founded on their  'predictions' or lets just call them LIES
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 20:05
moisok
For some unknown reason you have the desire to repeat previous posts without offering anything new. Do you forget what was posted not long ago?
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:06
THE BILLIONs that have been made on very shaky premises or LIES

Now they bring out a school girl to hide behind

it is so funny
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 20:06

Oct 18, 2019 -- 8:03PM, moisok wrote:


do yah get my drift - they ain't facts they are just fantasy - PREDICTIONS

By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 20:08
Post went missing.

They are predictions. Thanks for that I thought they'd invented time travel.
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Oct 19 20:10
Had enough for a while as deniers just posting rubbish. Moisok I asked you a lot of questions above perhaps you'll grow some and answer them. I doubt it though.
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:12
or the massive number of organisations driving the LIES.   You don't have far to go to find out the number and who they are - and their aims - all very sinister - in fact it could be called a conspiracy

but suck it up and believe all you are told chumps
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:14
The scientific method can prove something. After rigorous testing.  The proven item can be overturned by new methods and new evidence.

This does not appear to have been applied to the 'science' of global warming which in fact is no science - but more a political and then money making scam.
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Oct 19 20:20
More posts from the deniers & still zero evidence.

Not all of climate science is about predictions- much is just gathering evidence (using thermometers rather than bears ) . The planet is warmer now than it was 40 years ago - that is not a prediction.
Glaciers are smaller now than they were 40 years ago- that is not a prediction- it is just scientists looking out their back door and recording what they see.

Their predictions are pretty accurate.
Who said no snow (in UK???) by when??? - is this actually a quote my a scientific institution, was it in a journal, a paper. Is there a link to this story?

Seems very strange as the wiry is temperature will rice by 2 C this century- will still be snow in Scottish mountains if a 2C rise.
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Oct 19 20:24
Moisok- measuring temperature is very accurate-

You have provided zero evidence that the thermometers (not polar bears) give false readings for past 50 years in thousands of locations.

Just uneducated speculation - Pure garbage. Did the son of god tell you this
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:25
Isn't it odd how one of the most notorious/famous  'NO SNOW FOR CHILDREN IN THE UK'   has suddenly slipped the mind of the Global Warming Inquisition (as above)   
It was blared all over the place to scare everybody but the clever scientist attempts to deny it was ever said.

How perfectly convenient and droll.

The old tactic. They are in denial again oh ho ho ho
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 20:26
where are these bears  - they wanted to talk about them and scare the world - used as their poster boys - now they are virtually ignored coz it don't suit the narrative anymore.
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Oct 19 20:57
Moisok

If this story is so important then provide a link.
Which professor said it? Was it a scientific organisation?

Seems a very strange quote as  a 2C rise will still be cold enough for snow in UK

You have still not provided any evidence asked for on the opening post.
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 21:08
the interesting thing is the paper that possibly first published this outrageous prediction has now deleted it from its search engine
but it is still around eleswhere  sot the attempts to rewrite history failed there

but your global warming inquisition lot wouldn't tamper with evidence would they Mex 

or tamper with other information graphs etc etc

oh ho ho

ps
it was known as probably the worst blunder by a global warming scaremonger

read by millions
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Oct 19 21:19
What paper?
What link Moisok?

WTF is this vital evidence- seems a strange quote as a 2 C rise would still allow snow in parts of UK - just a shorter "snow season "
The Scottish mountains have snow between October/ November until April/ May - a 2C rise wouldn't mean zero snow.

What're is a link to this story Moisok?
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 21:32
you claim to be a global warming inquisitor yet you don't even know about this eminent man from a supposedly eminent institution who made this famous statement
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Oct 19 21:37
Moisok

Stop posting lies
I don't claim to be a "global warming inquisitor " - this is some bull you have made up


Now are you posting lies about this "no snow " story?

Is there a link to this vital, all important story? Does this story exist?
Just post a link to your story & I will read it.
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 21:41
it is a bit like the bear story that the inquisition don't want to talk about either

goes to show how so many of the scarer predictions never occur

amusing if it wasn't such a serious money robbing scam
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Oct 19 21:44
It is a bit like you posting more lies Moisok

Where is a link to this really really really important story?

Oh dear you can't provide one . Are you posting lies Moisok.
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 21:47
I thought you knew it all - clearly you know very little if you don't know about this famous geezer

but there we go

hugs
By:
moisok
When: 18 Oct 19 21:48
1. Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
Page 11 of 25  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ... | 25 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com