Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 107 comments are related to the topic:
i don't think they really went to the moon.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 107
By:
Charlie
When: 25 Jul 19 09:43
Spoken by someone who knows nothing about the cameras, how they operated and the pictures they took.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 25 Jul 19 10:12
What is it today Charlie - a hangover?
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 10:15
Could be busy on here today Dr C .. I for one dont want to venture out much in this heat. Especially in my spacesuit Grin
By:
detraveller
When: 25 Jul 19 10:29
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-cae8ffbd65555afc45b1af583cb22b4d

yet another blunder by the fake moon landers.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 10:37
Y.A.W.N.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 13:21
You can lead the penguins to the water but you cannot get them to fly in the air.. No matter how hard they flap their wings Grin

Very similar to the astronauts trying to bump start the lunar matchbox motorway buggy Grin

Go grapple with the fairies grappler. As is the normal another minute of my life wasted talking to a lost extra from the walking dead Cry
By:
detraveller
When: 25 Jul 19 13:31
Thank you for leading us to the water. One day we will figure out how that plane crashing into the twin towers defied Newton's third law. One day...
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 13:32
Y.A.W.N.
By:
detraveller
When: 25 Jul 19 13:34
A hint would be great though.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 13:36
Y.A.W.N.
By:
Charlie
When: 25 Jul 19 14:44

Jul 23, 2019 -- 6:13PM, John.W.Henry. wrote:


When a compulsive liar is found out he tries to hide behind a sofa


You can come out now you can't stay there forever.

By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 15:15
Just Checking 24 Jul 19 22:03 Joined: 25 Jun 06 | Topic/replies: 28,739 | Blogger: Just Checking's blog
LOL Search for where JWH (who constantly insults others for being scientifically clueless but fails to consider that on a forum this large he will be dealing with some very educated people, and they won't be conspiracy nuts, and he will be laughed at) gets his quote from. He's getting his "awesome physics knowledge" from a copy and paste of a 9/11 conspiracy book written for and read by the tin foil coiffured and then repeated on scientifically illiterate conspiracy nut sites.


Missed this gem from Mr  " Not checked anything properly but i have amassed nearly 30K of posted drivel !!!!!!  ". Just hates reality that guy. Really believes this is a forum with a large educated power base ?????LaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh

And if you think being laughed at bothers me one iota then think again Grin

When you stand against the majority they will always try to belittle you on mass however if you know you have " done the research " you only need to look out for posters who may be able to take you forward. Those that try to simply bring you down to their " highly educated level "  are worthless. You may just want to check that if you get a few spare moments Happy

I will have to check that myself Cool

All i see from this non checker is the usual tin foil nonsense Grin Is that all any of them have ????

Not seen much from this particular poster to set me on the road to a higher education thats for sure..

Suggest you just keep on checking that your neck is above your shoulders. That would just about be your limit i suspect from reading your gimp like postings. Cry
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 15:16
I have no need to hide Charlie Grin

I just pick my battles.

You goons are old news .. I need new enemies.. lol

keeps me sharp Cool
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 25 Jul 19 15:17
Oh... BTW...


Y.A.W.N.
By:
Charlie
When: 25 Jul 19 16:01
It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.

As our new resident physics expert please explain this to me.

Place a 10 ton block of steel on the ground. Climb a ladder and drop from 10' onto the block. You'll accelerate due to gravity.

Now you stand on the ground and get a crane to hoist the 10 ton block above you and then drop it on you. It will accelerate at the same speed.

It would seem to me that the block dropping on you would do a lot more damage to you than when you dropped on the block even though both speeds were the same. Why is that?
By:
detraveller
When: 25 Jul 19 16:35
Are you taking bets on JW not answering this?
By:
Charlie
When: 25 Jul 19 17:29
0.00 on not answering, 1000/1 on answering (sensibly).
By:
geordie1956
When: 25 Jul 19 17:56
Some things defy physics at least in terms of our comprehension -

The sun's atmosphere, known as the corona, extends more than a million kilometres from its surface and reaches temperatures of two million degrees. When compared to the mere 5000 degrees the surface of the sun reaches, there's no explanation for why the temperature is so high.
By:
Mexico
When: 25 Jul 19 18:55
John

You claim to have an "A" in "common sense " clearly you don't.

You bought Newton & Physics to this thread yet when ask you a simple Physics question regarding the Kinetic energy of a steel beam or a mush heavier aeroplane travelling at the same velocity you refuse to answer. You even refuse to post a link to the site you cut n pasted this "science " from

Do you "not have a Scooby Do" John?

Please don't run away & cry in the corner John. Just calculate the energy of the plane & steel beam.
By:
dave1357
When: 25 Jul 19 19:21
Charlie • July 25, 2019 4:01 PM BST
It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.


ha ha he actually said that?  Maybe I should unblock him for clown value.
By:
brassneck
When: 25 Jul 19 19:28
they had a wee machine with them that nasa invented to make water,the mixed hydrogen and oxygen and then added chlorine 1nto it to make it pure and hey presto they had clean fresh drinking water ,which was a must to keep alive,"now i dont doubt this,but you would think that this innovative super idea could be given to the state of california who suffer from a serious water crisis every summer,after all they know how to make drinking water and yet scientists still search for solution to to california water problem.Why can the just not make a bigger version of the wee machine on apollo 11GrinGrinGrinGrinGrin
By:
Just Checking
When: 25 Jul 19 19:28
dave he's copy and pasting it from a 9/11 troother book with physics for conspiracy nuts.

Rumour is the Univerity of Troothers were going to continue the work of Stephen Hawking after he died, but after a hard night on weed and watching a Doctor Who marathon, they decided he was actually Davros and his work was part of a takeover conspiracy by the Daleks.
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 25 Jul 19 20:35
Spoon fed plus pressured by your peers and of the masses, that we really went to the moon on the back of 60's technology.

Yep, lap it up folks. Don't think for yourself...we really went to the moon
By:
Charlie
When: 25 Jul 19 20:37

Jul 25, 2019 -- 8:35PM, TheBetterBettor wrote:


Spoon fed plus pressured by your peers and of the masses, that we really went to the moon on the back of 60's technology.Yep, lap it up folks. Don't think for yourself...we really went to the moon


Well done TBB we did.

By:
Mexico
When: 25 Jul 19 21:29
Dave - I'm afraid that "common sense John" did actually post that insight to Newton's 3rd law.

Needless to say no mathematic proof or even an equation.

The "reason" according to John is (drum roll)

If you punch a steel bar it hurts (might even break bones in your hand) &
If a steel bar is swung into your hand it also hurts (may even break bones in your hand )

Poor Newton- why do the uneducated male "truthers " think they know more about science than a 12 year old child. Clearly no common sense- they don't have a Scooby Do.
By:
detraveller
When: 25 Jul 19 21:52

Jul 25, 2019 -- 4:01PM, Charlie wrote:


It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.As our new resident physics expert please explain this to me.Place a 10 ton block of steel on the ground. Climb a ladder and drop from 10' onto the block. You'll accelerate due to gravity.Now you stand on the ground and get a crane to hoist the 10 ton block above you and then drop it on you. It will accelerate at the same speed.It would seem to me that the block dropping on you would do a lot more damage to you than when you dropped on the block even though both speeds were the same. Why is that?


I'd really love an explanation of this from John.

By:
detraveller
When: 25 Jul 19 21:54
With his A grade in common sense as he claims, shouldn't be too hard to give an explanation.
By:
Charlie
When: 27 Jul 19 16:35
He must have bought a copy of Physics for Dummies and be struggling with the concept of science.
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com