Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
how would they go to the lavatory,they could not take their suits off.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 107
|
By:
the gas they passed would explode inside the suits.
|
|
By:
Banal.
|
|
By:
the mythen gas would be like ammonia going round the suits and it would suffocate them.
|
|
By:
Extra thrust on re-entry?
|
|
By:
if they had nappies on it would dampen the gas odor, but their eyes would water and they would be coughing ,and then go into a choking cough as the odor overpowered them,it would be like falling into a slurry pit,and breathing would be very difficult.
|
|
By:
Grissom said it was not possible and look what happened to him.
|
|
By:
Shat himself?
|
|
By:
And i have an other reason why i don't think they really went to the moon.
when Nixon rang them on the moon there was no time delay during their conversation,now this was 50 years ago. strange to say the least 250 thousand miles away and Nixon could talk to them as if he was phoning from the next room.in 1969 if you phoned someone in America from England phone delay in conversation was at least 3 to 4 seconds due to distance but it seems our Richard had no problems calling Neil on the moon.even though Huston had a time delay. |
|
By:
Another myth perpetuated by people who can't be bothered to listen to the original recording and don't understand simple physics. There is a delay while sound travels to the moon and the reply back from the astronauts. As soon as the astronauts' talk is received at Huston Nixon can speak immediately.
https://edition.cnn.com/videos/us/2014/02/21/raw-nixon-calls-the-moon-1969.nasa-att/video/playlists/buzz-aldrin/ |
|
By:
planet of the apes is a good film too, but ive yet to see us trying
to recover the space shuttle crews from a time warp. |
|
By:
^ wrong thread muppet
|
|
By:
Charlie 22 Jul 19 11:03 Joined: 01 Dec 01 | Topic/replies: 26,831 | Blogger: Charlie's blog
Another myth perpetuated by people who can't be bothered to listen to the original recording and don't understand simple physics. All from the man who advocates butter planes disappearing into steel structured towers and planes vanishing into thin air at shanksville. ?????????????? Simple physics my f***ing 8rse ???? Get a grip man ffs. Time after time you sink lower into the quagmire of hogwash What a buffoon you really are.  |
|
By:
Simple physics for most of us but beyond your comprehension.
|
|
By:
I hope Charlie's not going to throw another one of his tantrums again.
|
|
By:
It's about time Dr Drippin got some new material he seems limited to talking about bottom spanking and tantrums.
|
|
By:
^^See what I mean.
|
|
By:
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/moon-landing-conspiracy-theory-apollo-11-nasa-aldrin-armstrong-a9014141.html
. |
|
By:
brass normally a free thinker in the mould of Leonardo da Vinci but I feel he's on the wrong trajectory this time.
 |
|
By:
Just swear on the Bible you actually walked on the Moon.... That's the deal breaker for me...
 |
|
By:
so the commodore 64 took them to the moon and back again ,but they splashed down in the wrong place,no wonder they got rid of the commodore 64 .
 |
|
By:
and as for it being impossible to keep it a secret,i know a secret kept by 3 billion people called santa claus
|
|
By:
One for our resident expert on physics.. " Charlie "
1. Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” An aluminum plane hitting a thick steel beam will have the same effect as steel beam being swung at the same speed and hitting the plane. It makes no difference which one is moving as to the effect on the plane and the beam. In both cases the thick steel beam will do damage to the plane and the beam will emerge relatively undamaged. The faster the speed at the point of impact, the more damage that will be done to the plane. Try punching a steel girder. No matter how fast your hand is traveling, you will not be able to break through it; you will eventually break your hand. It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same. Keep believing Charlie baby but please stop posting your own personal laws of physics as they just dont make any sense. |
|
By:
Buildings have windows. And they aren't made of steel. The plane probably hit the window?
I agree if it had hit the steel part would have bounced right off the building. |
|
By:
Get back on the other thread detroller. Your input is required there to answer your " fake " statement
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Is this proving they never went to the moon?
|
|
By:
As usual the point i am making is that as in most other matters you havent really got a scooby do about anything
Clueless is the word that evaded me. |
|
By:
Go on try and answer a question for once in your life. What is the point you are making?
|
|
By:
Is it I'm making my own laws of physics up?
|
|
By:
Butter plane physics Charlie.. Think about it again and again and again.
You spout it but you dont really understand what you are saying do you ????? I have no idea what banana boat you sailed in on but i am pretty damn sure they were relieved when you hopped off and didnt take the return trip |
|
By:
It is what i judge you on Charlie. You know it is hence why i cannot take you seriously
 |
|
By:
Yet i find you on here preaching about physics..you couldn't make it up
|
|
By:
Let's look at the evidence on this thread.
I have not mentioned planes. I have not made up any physics. I have not preached about physics. You on the other hand have come up with numerous incorrect statements. You have also not answered any questions. Are you really that insecure that you can't answer a question? |
|
By:
Charlie 22 Jul 19 13:54 Joined: 01 Dec 01 | Topic/replies: 26,869 | Blogger: Charlie's blog
Simple physics for most of us but beyond your comprehension. Rate reply: | report block user |
|
By:
You were saying ?
|
|
By:
You are about to lose it Charlie
|
|
By:
You state you understand simple physics ? Yes or No ?
|
|
By:
Yes
|
|
By:
1. Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” An aluminum plane hitting a thick steel beam will have the same effect as steel beam being swung at the same speed and hitting the plane. It makes no difference which one is moving as to the effect on the plane and the beam. In both cases the thick steel beam will do damage to the plane and the beam will emerge relatively undamaged. The faster the speed at the point of impact, the more damage that will be done to the plane. Try punching a steel girder. No matter how fast your hand is traveling, you will not be able to break through it; you will eventually break your hand. It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.
|