Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 320 comments are related to the topic:
London Tube Bombing anniversary

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 6 of 9  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 320
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:31
On a very serious note though, why do both of you not believe the jury's verdict that london bombings were fake?
Why do you still want an inquiry?
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:34
There is a big reason why they dont want anything looked at independently as they would have to keep swinging the National Security joker so as not to have to reveal the truth. Make of that what you will.

Everything is there for those that want to see it. Well perhaps not everything but enough GrinLaugh
By:
terry mccann
When: 23 Jul 19 14:34
Learn ENGLISH because you m I s u n d e r s t a n d  w h a t  w e  s a I d, if not pointless you being here innit
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:35
Lets talk about Power and his startling revelation on the morning of the bombings shall we ..... Incredible scenes.. He should have started a tipping line service Happy
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:37
So you guys think when a court of law says the london bombings were fake, it doesn't have any significance?

But the chief of crisis management's interview on TV should be looked into in order to reach the same verdict as the jury?

How stupid are you two?
By:
Charlie
When: 23 Jul 19 14:37
“There has been much nonsense written about why my company ran an exercise on 7 July 2005 that had very close parallels to the real thing that day. Since then I have made several attempts to add my own comments to numerous sites that seem to get increasingly excited about their own conspiracy theories and in the process exclude any rational debate. It seems those who occupy the world of finding conspiracy theories to replace just about any coincidence, do not want to have any dialogue with those offering a different view, but I have not yet given up hope. I am therefore hoping, perhaps naively, that someone might like to read an honest and factual account about a particular exercise my company ran in London three years ago.

Unfortunately, the BBC had postponed in 2008 a programme in their ‘conspiracy files’ series that would have done this. Our client three years ago agreed to be named in the BBC programme since the attitude of the producer and his team was very balanced (several conspiracy theorists were also invited to take part). We even allowed our complete exercise material to be made available to the BBC. Regrettably broadcasting in 2008 might have jeopardised an ongoing court case, so they had little choice about postponing it to 2009.

Early in 2005 Reed Elsevier, an organisation specialising in information and publishing that employs 1,000 people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse it before sign-off. Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July.

The test was planned as a table-top walk through for about six people (the CM team) in a lecture room with all injects simulated. Everything was on MS PowerPoint. The location of their Central London office near to Chancery Lane was chosen as one test site. With many staff travelling to work via the London underground system, the chosen exercise simulated incendiary devices on three trains, very similar to a real IRA attack in 1992, as well as other events.

As there had been eighteen terrorist bomb attacks on tube trains prior to 2005, choosing the London Underground was logical rather than just prescient. With this in mind it was hardly surprising that Deutsche Bank had run a similar exercise a few days before and, prior to that, a multi-agency (and much publicised) exercise code-named Osiris II had simulated a terrorist attack at Bank tube station. Moreover, I had also taken part in a BBC Panorama programme in 2004 as a panellist alongside Michael Portillo MP et al, in an unscripted debate (we had no idea at all what the scenario was to be?) on how London might once again, deal with terrorist attacks, only this time it was fictional (created entirely by the BBC).

In short, some of the research for our exercise had already been done. The scenario developed for our client even started by using fictitious news items from the Panorama programme then, as with any walk through exercise, events unfolded solely on a screen as dictated by the facilitator without any external injects or actions beyond the exercise room. Also factored into the scenario was to be an above ground fictitious bomb exploding not far from the head office of the protected Jewish Chronicle magazine where for exercise purposes, our imagined terrorists would have been aware that commuters would now be walking to work (past a building already considered a target) as some tube stations would have been closed.

Of just eight nearby tube stations that fell within possible exercise scope, three were chosen that, by coincidence, were involved in the awful drama that actually took place on 7 July 2005. A level of scenario validation that on this occasion, we could have done without.

An exercise that turns into the real thing is not that unusual. For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when a tube train derailed and hit a wall at speed. At the same time, the City of London Police were running an exercise for their central casualty bureau where the team quickly abandoned their plans and swung into action to cope with the real thing.

For a surprising number of people such coincidents[sic] cannot be accepted as such. There just has to be a conspiracy behind them, despite the obvious point that painstaking research will always identify probable above possible scenarios. By the way, the only reason I was asked to speak on TV news that day, when there was still much confusion about the real tragedies, was to encourage more organisations to thoroughly plan their own exercises knowing the threat of "terrorism" is and remains, very real. One tragic consequence being Islam, a great Abrahamic, monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has undeservedly become vilified by some people.”
Peter Power (April 6, 2009)  [1]
By:
terry mccann
When: 23 Jul 19 14:39
Remain me sweet chaz,what time train did the "bombers" get on in the end according to you?
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:40
I have just had to watch it again just to make sure i wasnt having a bad dream Grin

Comedy gold Cool

When you look into any of these so called  "terrorist attacks" having MSM video footage featuring the likes of Power being interviewed just makes you want to look for the truth because you know from that moment forward it is all complete b****x.

I think the word i am looking for is IRREFUTABLE Grin
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:42
In 1977, Queen Elizabeth signed an executive order to allow spraying of chemicals in the air to make UK soil more fertile.

Did you guys know that?
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:42
Charlie trying desperately to justify his belief in a billion to one shot Laugh

Keep believing Charlie. They need you too.
By:
Charlie
When: 23 Jul 19 14:44
tm 07:25
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:44
PETER POWER: Today we were running an exercise for a company—bearing in mind I’m now in the private sector—and we sat everybody down in the City. A thousand people involved in the whole organization, but the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was we based our scenario on the simultaneous attacks on that underground and mainline station so we had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real.

[. . . ]

INTERVIEWER: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?

POWER: Almost precisely.

SOURCE: Peter Power 7/7 Terror Rehearsal

In the hours after the July 7th, 2005 bombings in London, Peter Power gave a series of interviews to various outlets confirming that he had been running an exercise at the exact time of the attack. That exercise envisioned bombs going off at Liverpool Street, King’s Cross, and Russell Square at exactly the same time as real bombs were going off at those very locations.

PETER POWER: At half past 9 this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely.

SOURCE: Peter Power 7/7 Terror Rehearsal

What are we to make of this? Is this just a remarkable coincidence? Proof of the the keen insight of advisors like Peter Power in correctly predicting the locations and times of likely terror attacks? Or something altogether different? And, if this was set up by some intelligence agency or someone with advance knowledge of the real attack, what would be the point? Why would they bother to schedule a drill “rehearsing the event” at the same time as the event itself?

Just as there are various kinds of drills, war games and exercises, so, too, are there different ways that such simulations could be used to help facilitate an actual event. A drill could be used to distract security services and hinder responses, for example, thus helping an attack to succeed. Or the exercise could act as an alibi in case the plot is discovered before it can take place. Or, in an even more chilling scenario, a war game or training event could be used to recruit patsies who, believing they are only taking part in an exercise, unwittingly move people or equipment into place for a real attack.

In the name of keeping things real.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:45
Get back on the topic detroller come on. Face the music
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:46
No I want to talk about Elizabeth and chemtrails.

Why did she allow that? Anyone can see making the soil more fertile was just an excuse.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:48
Shame they didnt have Power available stateside on 9/11/01... Oh wait a minute ...Grin
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:49
Open up a thread then detroller
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:49
no we can discuss it here.
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:50
or you make one. I don't want to be banned exposing the elite.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:51
Not interested tbh. Maybe if you show enough interest i will look at it as there is bound to be something being suppressed if you are involved Grin
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:54
What you got on this Power baloney then detroller ???

Your house of cards belief about the 7/7 narrative is built around him .. Comfortable with that ?? Charlie seems happy enough with the tale Grin
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:55
John, do you realize that I actually believe the london bombings to be fake? Have you not been reading my posts?
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 23 Jul 19 14:56
DT

Do you really believe they were fake?
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 14:57
Nope Detroller. I stopped reading your tripe yonks ago when i exposed you as a fraud with your air fones fiasco
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 23 Jul 19 14:57
There is a bloke who lost part of his leg, lives near a pal of mine. He had the whole leg before 7/7.  I don't think he would accept free rent for the rest of his life as payment for losing half his leg. He has also got a free car and disabled bay.
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 14:58

Jul 23, 2019 -- 2:56PM, Whisperingdeath wrote:


DTDo you really believe they were fake?


WD get out of here asap. Just trust me. Leave this thread. Now.

By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 23 Jul 19 15:00
Winkok
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:01
Never trust him Mr Death. He doesnt know the meaning of the word truth Grin
By:
terry mccann
When: 23 Jul 19 15:01
Whisper strange he uses the word "fake", it certainly wasn't a fake but many believe it to be a false flag,there is a huge differences between the two.
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 15:02
Can we please talk about queen elizabeth and chemtrails now?
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:05
Its ok Terry you have exposed him. Well done. Now everyone will know wherever you stand on the ladder he is one rung behind you Grin
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:06
One small step for Terry, One giant step required for Detroller Grin
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:07
I think you have nailed him again there Terry lad. Lets see Grin
By:
detraveller
When: 23 Jul 19 15:11
Switzerland just reported its first injury due to 5G and you guys think its all a joke.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:13
Get it on the right thread Detroller. Terry will deal with you over there as well. Game set and match to Terry here i feel
By:
terry mccann
When: 23 Jul 19 15:15
Sorry to say detroller,you have used the word "fake" which means in English as not real,7/7 was very real,everybody is saying that,until you get a better grasp please don't post anymore as you are getting a little tiresome with your lack of the lingo
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:16
The problem you have Detroller is that your brush has been tarred. Now many will just look at your posts and simply giggle. Bizarre.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:17
Can they come back from the power ace Terry ? Or are they finally sunk ? Laugh
By:
Charlie
When: 23 Jul 19 15:22
The conspiritard theories are fake as in not real, as in made up bollocks without any supporting evidence. That's lingo enough.
By:
terry mccann
When: 23 Jul 19 15:23
John,looks like it might of blown a fuse, full service neededLaugh
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 23 Jul 19 15:23
He is running away from you Terry. He has made another fatal error. Maybe he is being heavily influenced by his German surroundings ? Maybe they are clouding his judgements ?? Lets see
Page 6 of 9  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com