Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 320 comments are related to the topic:
London Tube Bombing anniversary
London Tube Bombing anniversary
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 320
|
By:
I also don't understand what your friend John is 'researching' on.
A high court said the bombings were a hoax. Yet he is doing his research on a documentary??? |
|
By:
At 4pm on Thursday 12th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad’Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to ‘pervert the course of justice’.
Mr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail. His offence? He had sent six DVD copies of his film ‘7/7: The Ripple Effect’ to various persons at the time (in 2008) of the trial in Kingston of three ‘terror’ suspects, alleged co-conspirators with the London ‘suicide bombers’. The DVD’s were intercepted and never reached their targets. The Kingston suspects were found innocent (only to later be retried for the same offences, but that’s another story). Muad’Dib’s trial started on Monday 9th May, with a challenge to the monarchy and, hence, the authority of the court. This was ruled ‘out of order’ by the judge. On Tuesday a jury were sworn in. On Wednesday they watched all of his film, ‘The Ripple Effect’, in open court. Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources. This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state. It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12. It is surely not unfair to deduce that Southwark Crown Court’s jury of ordinary persons did not reject Muad’Dib’s false-flag narrative as outrageous or even necessarily untrue. One wonders how many of that jury have now themselves been converted into active ‘troofers’? During the trial (on Wednesday) JAH/Hill/Muad’Dib was asked why he moved to Ireland: “To pursue my study of the lost Ark of the Covenant” was his reply. Here is a character, both serious and refreshing, who brings a mythic dimension into life. Onlookers were impressed by the way he was able to conduct himself without fear in the witness-box, sometimes pausing 5-10 seconds to reflect, before replying. A group of up to 25 supporters attended the four days of the trial, a couple travelling from as far afield as Finland and the state of Montana. Let’s hope that will be the end of the persecution of Mr JAH by the British state – and, that he soon starts on a 2nd edition of his Ripple Effect. It’s the opinion of Sheffield University social-sciences professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill’s Ripple Effect’s narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible and better fits the facts than did the BBC’s 7/7 ‘Conspiracy Files‘ program. His well-referenced study focussed very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot – as the best account yet. The new 3rd edition of my book Terror on the Tube endorses this view. In contrast, the so-called ‘July 7th Truth Campaign’ has scoffed at the Ripple narrative calling it ‘evidence-free conjecture,’ a quite breathtaking (and very revealing) remark. |
|
By:
If people are going to believe all they are told without checking it out then they end up like you-a clueless clown, I suggest you watch it boy
|
|
By:
You have to keep digging. Eventually you will find what you personally can comfortably accept as a truthful analysis.
|
|
By:
Terry, let it go m8. State your resources and leave it with them. Thats all you can do. Most of the time it is there in plain sight IF you can be bothered to look.
|
|
By:
You believe this guy Nick Kollerstrom. The new 3rd edition of my book Terror on the Tube endorses this view
https://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/ Nicholas Kollerstrom is an English Historian of Science and author who is known for Holocaust denial and the promotion of conspiracy theories. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Kollerstrom |
|
By:
I think it is these so called " terror drills " scheduled to take place in the very same venues at the very same time which give the whole game away. This narrative is defo the weapon of choice but it is flawed
|
|
By:
Charlie.. Just keep reading the fairy tales m8. You will sleep well
|
|
By:
The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12
Do you mind me asking what the case was here? |
|
By:
https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2008/may/04/highereducation
When academics lose their power of reason Once he was away from his scientific studies, Kollerstrom embraced them all. 'Let us hope the schoolchildren visitors are properly taught about the elegant swimming pool at Auschwitz, built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and Sunday afternoons while watching the water polo matches,' he said of the Nazi genocide. 'Let's hope they are shown postcards written from Auschwitz, where the postman would collect the mail twice weekly.' You believe this guy? |
|
By:
It seems to me the case was about the guy sending videos to the jury, thus compromising the case.
He goes to court for it. And the jury starts watching his video? wtf? And so they realize that the video was truthful. And let the guy go? What was he found 'not guilty' of? |
|
By:
John, when I said to Charlie lets talk about Mr.Power,his reply was "he is not important", when I said to mex,lets talk about WTC7,his reply was "its not important". You really couldn't make it up could you!
 |
|
By:
Please tell me this John, so I can continue my research. I can't figure out what he was found not guilty of. The case makes zero sense to me. The truthfulness of the videos have nothing to do with the crime that got him in jail/ Or am i missing something?
|
|
By:
John don't run away now. I seriously read your post. Yet you won't entertain a small question?
What was he found not guilty of? Its a simple question |
|
By:
John?
|
|
By:
Just read the post Detroller .. Try the top line ffs
|
|
By:
I really dont understand why you dont " get it " Charlie ??? You above many others have been given the knowledge, the evidence , the facts which totally destroy the official narratives yet you still bark up the wrong tree ????
“When people who are honestly mistaken are given the opportunity to learn the truth, they will either cease being mistaken, or cease being honest!” As i have said b4 Charlie I know for sure where you sit within that statement and there4 i cannot entertain any of the tripe you post as it will not be honest as if you lie to yourself and your family you are sure as f*** going to lie on here. I respect the fact that you are entitled to have an opinion yet you dont help yourself to move forward by not understanding what is presented to you. There is a statement contained with that above .... It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ If you apply common sense and critical thinking you will be able to move forward and see through the mass of lies and deception. Alternatively stay on your hamster wheel as it is obviously your comfort blanket. Enough waffle ???? |
|
By:
Detroller... Watch the film and see your official narrative disappear down the swanee river !!! Glad i have started to look into this now. As Terry has stated this Power guy is unreal. Are we really expected to believe his nonsense ???
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
OMFG... These CCTV images.. Good god. WTF are they all about ???
|
|
By:
And know i am hit with the old CCTV are out of action again... LOL.. The old pentagon trick
 |
|
By:
And the bus one
  |
|
By:
J Waffle H
You seem to have an affinity with people who are anti-Jewish. You posted another link to one of their sites on a previous thread. Do you believe what Kollestrom says? |
|
By:
Do 1 charlie.. You have nothing to add here. Bit like an old skid mark in a dirty pair of boxers... No earthly use to any1.
|
|
By:
This really is the nonsense Terry said it was,.
Fair play Terry you got this one bang on. IMO. |
|
By:
You posted a long quote by Kollestrom to try and aid your nonsense. I'm asking if you believe him. Do you?
|
|
By:
John, you have talked about cctv images, pentagon, bus, pair of boxers and what not since my last post.
Why do you try to deflect such simple questions? I know you don't have to answer. But what's wrong with having a decent dscussion? Stop deflecting. |
|
By:
And please don't come back with 'Its in the video' answer.
You should be educated enough to answer simple questions without having to refer everyone to the video you are gathering views for. |
|
By:
Don't assume he's educated enough to answer anything sensibly dt.
|
|
By:
Detroller.. Regardless of what they were trying to nail him for... once they had seen the video and understood what it was all about he was always going to found not guilty and he knew it. Unless of course it happened to be a kangaroo court
Would just love to see this broadcast to the nation and let them decide. Maybe we could have a vote on it ..who is telling the truth ???? .. like brexit maybe ??? |
|
By:
Dont wait on it lads... I dont entertain you anymore. Just put up the resources. You and others can then decide.
|
|
By:
No need to wait as I know you don't answer questions.
The whole Ripple Effect video is sheer unjustifiable drivel based on absolutely zero evidence. |
|
By:
It's not even believed by the one site that researched virtually every aspect of the bombings and didn't believe the official findings.
|
|
By:
Detroller.. Regardless of what they were trying to nail him for
Are you serious? |
|
By:
Well well well.........
in 2010, Tony Farrell, a principal police intelligence analyst was preparing the annual threat assesment report for South Yorkshire Police. He discovered compelling evidence that both the 9/11 and 7/7 terrorist attacks were not carried out by “Islamic extremists”. Looking at the evidence of these events, Tony used his training as an Intelligence Analyst to weigh up whether these events were in fact carried out by the intelligence agencies of the UK and US with the intention to justify the US’s publicly stated goal of military world domination. He offered to submit his analysis based on this compelling information. He was eventually sacked for holding this view, even though, neither the police nor the employment tribunal by their own admissions looked at the analysis he offered. Condemnation before investigation. So even one of their own couldn't cope with the lies deceptions and murder of innocent people anymore. Now that is 1 brave man. Now lets keep it real , he had decades of experience and understanding of matters such as above and for him to come out into the public and be prepared to call out the authorities should tell you all you need to know. Sacked for holding that view ...OMFG. This just gets worse and worse. Terry what have you done to me  |
|
By:
And then you come up with your trademark Waffle post. Another deflection?
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Are those that hide or deny the truth as guilty as those that perpetrate the crime ???
They certainly stick to the same side of the tarnished brush of tyranny !!! |
|
By:
What are you on about?
|
|
By:
There are several on here you should take a long hard look at themselves imo.
Particularly those that have been given the opportunity to see beyond the official spin. They really have no excuse but if they feel they want to be tarred with that same brush then it is there call. At least everyone will know where they stand when they try to discuss anything with them . Being forewarned is being forearmed. I have exposed some of them so just tread warily any1 who entertains them |