Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1211 comments are related to the topic:
Tommy back in Court tomorrow 4th July
Tommy back in Court tomorrow 4th July
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,211
|
By:
Ibrahima Sonko 12 Jul 19 22:17 WhisperingDRIVEL Do you think that TR should be detained in category a prison ? erm why did you think I give a flying fcek? |
|
By:
treetop 12 Jul 19 21:34
It's criminal what the police and CPS did to those kids after being brave enough to talk to Maggie Oliver about their abusive situations injera, scum can prevail in many walks of life.Trying to frustrate and brush it all under the carpet to minimise convictions.The idiots that savour TR's conviction should read that book and weep for our society. It's criminal what the police and CPS did to those kids Yeah but lets save our wrath for the musso's right! Fcek the Police! |
|
By:
Ibrahima Sonko 12 Jul 19 22:17
WhisperingDRIVEL Do you think that TR should be detained in category a prison ? Do you think the Police should be investigated? Do you care? |
|
By:
Tommy is probably drinking the milk of human kindness as we speak!
|
|
By:
Whisperingdeath • July 12, 2019 11:22 PM BST
Tommy is probably drinking the milk of human kindness as we speak! Not sure I understand   |
|
By:
He's almost certainly in solitary . I never experienced solitary myself but I've seen one or two that have and the effect it has on them is awful . Certainly no human kindness
 |
|
By:
Goodnight Reynard.
Sweet dreams for you about Tommy drinking your milk of human kindness  |
|
By:
Uh ?
|
|
By:
It's another prison banditry pun
|
|
By:
FFS ! The man is obsessed with gay sex . What on earth is wrong with him ?
 |
|
By:
whimperingdeath knows all the gay lingo!! just saying!!
|
|
By:
Yeah , so it seems . It's starting to fall into place now
|
|
By:
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjJK_2-pqRA |
|
By:
Reynard 12 Jul 19 23:48
FFS ! The man is obsessed with gay sex . What on earth is wrong with him ? Are you saying there is something wrong with gay sex Reynard?  |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Yaxley was not sentenced to 10 weeks solitary confinement!
Why do these people always lie! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Whimpering Whelk..... BACON ALERT
|
|
By:
who decides which prison an offender will serve time in?
The judge? Home Secretary (Javid)? wtf is he doing in an A? Closed prison A (High Security) Those whose escape would be highly dangerous to the public or national security. Offences that may result in consideration for Category A or Restricted Status include: (Attempted) Murder, Manslaughter, Wounding with intent, Rape, Kidnapping, Indecent assault, Robbery or conspiracy to rob (with firearms), Firearms offences, Importing or supplying Class A controlled drugs, Possessing or supplying explosives, Offences connected with terrorism and Offences under the Official Secrets Act[citation needed] B Those who do not require maximum security, but for whom escape still needs to be made very difficult. C Those who cannot be trusted in open conditions but who are unlikely to try to escape Open prison D Those who can be reasonably trusted not to try to escape, and are given the privilege of an open prison. Prisoners at "D Cat." (as it is commonly known) prisons, are, subject to approval, given ROTL (Release On Temporary Licence) to work in the community or to go on "home leave" once they have passed their FLED (Full Licence Eligibility Dates), which is usually a quarter of the way through the sentence. Category A, B and C prisons are called closed prisons, whereas category D prisons are called open prisons. Category A prisoners are further divided into Standard Risk, High Risk, and Exceptional Risk, based on their likelihood of escaping.[2] Men on remand are held in Category B conditions with the exception of some of those who are held to be tried on (very) serious offences. These men are held in "Provisional Category A" conditions. |
|
By:
Belmarsh is a holding nick... most prisoners are waiting to be allocated elsewhere.
|
|
By:
woundedknee 13 Jul 19 11:18
Whimpering Whelk..... BACON ALERT If there was a God I don't think he would ban a bacon sandwich do you? |
|
By:
I was expecting people here to have dissected the detailed verdict in detail by now. Yet not a single person is talking about it?
Some were arguing tommy's video did not influence the case and so he was innocent. That is exactly what the judge said. Some here said he'll be serving months in prison for this yet its only 2 months. And unless I missed something, now people are suggesting he'll be in solitary? Where does it say that? Or is it just an opinion because you think he'll be killed by the muslims in prison? And I know its a little harsh to say this but his 11 previous convictions were a factor as the judge clearly mentioned. So he's a serial offender. The only reason i wanted to read about this case was when people started blaming the courts for having political intentions. You see when you blame the media, the police, or the politicians of something, that is understandable because these people always have an agenda(yes even the police). But when it comes to courts, their decisions are well documented and even if they have an agenda, they need to find a way to hide it. I am astonished no one wants to find any faults in the verdict once it has come out, but everyone had a problem with it before the details were announced. |
|
By:
traveller,
one Judge said this before his Leeds stunt I think In short, Mr. Yaxley-Lennon, turn up at another court, refer to people as "Muslim paedophiles, Muslim rapists" and so on and so forth while trials are ongoing and before there has been a finding by a jury that that is what they are, and you will find yourself inside. Do you understand? Thank you very much. The writing was on the wall! and people still claim he is innocent! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
detraveller 13 Jul 19 11:38 I was expecting people here to have dissected the detailed verdict in detail by now. Yet not a single person is talking about it? detraveller because it is clear many people only come on this thread to spread their Islamapohobia. There is a conspiracy against the truth and Justice that needs investigating Police, Social Services, Local Councillors, Politicians and the conspiracy of silence by the local community who allowed this to happen on their doorstep. |
|
By:
Whimperingdeath • July 13, 2019 10:58 AM BST
Reynard 12 Jul 19 23:48 FFS ! The man is obsessed with gay sex . What on earth is wrong with him ? Are you saying there is something wrong with gay sex Reynard? No , certainly not . Gay sex is pretty much essential for non-celibate homosexuals . What I strongly object to is your continued references to such acts on an open forum . Your sexuality is your business but please refrain from referencing your personal details on an unrelated thread |
|
By:
|
|
By:
TR was in solitary last time 'for his own safety. He was threatened with poisoning my the Muslims in the kitchen so he ate tinned tuna. He lost 2 stone.
His exercise amounted to less than a hour a day, accompanied by prison guards and separate from other prisoners. It would be very surprising if he wasn't in solitary this time. dt - you quote this: It consisted of the reckless disobedience of an important court order . In the trial Leeds court admitted they failed to publicise any reporting restriction. TR checked the official Govt website citing that no contempt is possible when repeating already publicised facts of the case. Geoffrey Cox MP for the prosecution said the website was wrong! It was a political trial. As with Maggie Oliver, the people who speak out against paedos get silenced. |
|
By:
Injera, I don't deny that there's a lot of things wrong here. But when I see people saying things like you just mentioned, it makes me think, did he have a crap lawyer?
Surely his lawyers put these things to the judge? How did the judge respond? Is there a way to find out that information? |
|
By:
Whimperingdeath • July 13, 2019 11:48 AM BST
detraveller because it is clear many people only come on this thread to spread their Islamapohobia. There is a conspiracy against the truth and Justice that needs investigating Police, Social Services, Local Councillors, Politicians and the conspiracy of silence by the local community who allowed this to happen on their doorstep. Please can you explain exactly what you define as "Islamaphobia" ? Preferably without referencing any sex acts |
|
By:
It consisted of the reckless disobedience of an important court order imposed to protect the integrity of the Akhtar trial and subsequent trials, and of conduct which created a substantial risk of a serious impediment to the integrity of the trial process.
@Injera Is this 'important court order' referring to the reporting restrictions you just mentioned? |
|
By:
Yes dt.
I followed Ezra Levant's live tweets from the trial at the Old Bailey. Not sure they can still be read but probably. You can find out the whole discourse there. They had no intention of setting him free no matter what the case for his defence. |
|
By:
SO basically it can be proved with cached version of the website that the restriction wasn't there.
And the prosecutor himself admits that. And yet the judge puts it in his verdict? If that is indeed the case, then, like i said a few days ago, you have way bigger problems in the country than grooming gangs and tommy robinson. |
|
By:
The fact is Tommy Yaxley-Lennon has made himself the center of this story.
It is NOT about him. Apart from victims the voice that needs to be heard and an enquiry should be built around this lady Maggie Oliver A Vocal critic of the failures of Politicians, Senior Police Officers and the criminal justice agencies to fulfill their legal obligation to protect children and prosecute perpetrators, campaigning for legal Accountability for those who knowingly fail in this duty. |
|
By:
I believe Anne Cryer had a lot to say about it too way back.
|
|
By:
We have to look at TR as one of many who speak out and are silenced.
I've read about Ann Cryer MP for Keighley, who said this in 2002: Yet no one wanted to know. Cryer said she had "constant" meetings with West Yorkshire police and social services, only to be told there was no point trying to mount prosecutions. She claimed: "They found constant excuses not to do anything. When Keighley's problem was out in the open, she claimed to have talked about the issue with Ken Livingstone, then mayor of London, at City Hall. According to Cryer, "Ken was convinced I had got it all wrong. He was so politically correct, he was off this planet at that time, was Ken." |
|
By:
The police will never help you against the govt.
I don't know why people don't understand that. Its an institution of the government. They follow orders. |
|
By:
TR has never said it's about him. Last week outside the OB, on stage were some brave ladies and teenagers speaking of abuse and the collusion of the police.
TR has repeatedly said if they can lock him up, they can do it to any journalist or member of the public who seeks to shine a light on grooming gangs, high profle paedos etc etc. I believe him to be correct. Ann Cryer had panic buttons fitted in 2002. Sarah Champion MP had police protection 2 years ago. |
|
By:
I don't think anybody believed Ann Cryer back then, Certainly in London it was hard to believe that this industrial scale criminal exploitation could go on unnoticed or unchecked by the Police. She would have seen it for herself but it would have beggared belief.
The lack of focus on the Police, Council and Social Services is a serious problem and people gobbing off about Yaxley is still diverting attention away from what still needs to be done. |
|
By:
In short, Mr. Yaxley-Lennon, turn up at another court,
refer to people as "Muslim paedophiles, Muslim rapists" and so on and so forth while trials are ongoing and before there has been a finding by a jury that that is what they are, and you will find yourself inside. Do you understand? Thank you very much. He was in contempt of court. He did not get locked up for protesting about child grooming or being a " journalist " |
