Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
27 May 19
08:23
Joined:
Date Joined:
28 Aug 07
Did a runner on a hissy fit. Bless.
Show More
I wasn't drawing any such equivalence. It suits you to make people one homogeneous group rather than
the reality of a heterogeneous group. Simple minded thinking for simple minded people.
the reality of a heterogeneous group. Simple minded thinking for simple minded people.
34,000 terrorist atrocities since 9/11
Do people on here really support stuff like that?
Do people on here really support stuff like that?
Muslim Defence League , Their actions do appear Defensive to me , They were in Full attack mode 
The Likes of Study and the Team will wake up One day
The Likes of Study and the Team will wake up One day
I'll say it again. Islam is an ideology, Muslims are people. As such I recognise they come in a variety of different stripes. Merely highlighting the problem posed by the navigation of Islamic texts.
No. They don't and they never have.
Glad you're in a position to speak up for them.
Are you familiar with many?
Glad you're in a position to speak up for them.
Are you familiar with many?
Study
Do you think that demographic change and the attitudes of British Muslims are cause for concern?
Do you think that demographic change and the attitudes of British Muslims are cause for concern?
"basic hate-speak all over this forum"
Not sure we are Talking HATE Study ,a lot is truth
Hundreds have Lost their Lives Across the Country in the name of ISLAM
Teams of Rapists have been Operating nationwide Unhindered for Years
Its a Shame the Community have not come out demonstrating against the Above as they have against the Teachings of Gay Sex .
I would say what is written above is Truth , and The Only hate involved is among the said Community...
Not sure we are Talking HATE Study ,a lot is truth
Hundreds have Lost their Lives Across the Country in the name of ISLAM
Teams of Rapists have been Operating nationwide Unhindered for Years
Its a Shame the Community have not come out demonstrating against the Above as they have against the Teachings of Gay Sex .
I would say what is written above is Truth , and The Only hate involved is among the said Community...
As pointed out - My earlier post deleted.
Crippen. You never give up do you?
Pitiful.
Lux. As full an answer as I can provide, and which I hope will explain my views. You might want to read it fairly quickly, my posts tend to be removed quite often.
Not that they are remotely important.
Demographic change worldwide has always been a concern for the people who consider their land is being "invaded".
When however, it hasn't been invaded (see 1930's Germany) and the "Invasion" scare is propagated by would-be politicians and people online (a new bad medium for such problems), who make "concerns", I fear for society. Not for the issues caused by demographic change - which may not be actual change, but awareness of differences - but for the issues caused by "soldiers" who given the opportunity will do exactly the things that people are worried about the perceived enemy doing.
Causing division - which incidentally positive discrimination does as well, is not a cure for anything.
The divisive nature of this forum is indicative of quite a bit of society as a whole. It always happens when people are suffering or skint, or in some other form of depressed situation. They're looking for blame and some chancers are providing them with it.
Whether the users of this forum or any other daily mail/LBC like it or not, if people had some spare cash and a bit more spare time, they'd be less angry and would care a lot less about politics and we'd have a better state of happiness.
The biggest problem is 40 years of bad government, huge disparity of rich and poor and depleted infrastructure.
The blame doesn't lie with muslims, or benefit scroungers, or whatever the next thing the media and government try to blame it on.
Politicians are having a subsidised drink and a cigarette in the house of commons (the law doesn't apply there) bars and raking it in while watching the population arguing about immigrants, Brexit, Trump or anything else journalists are living off, while we all argue, fight and keep them in power.
To summarise, the demographic change is not as great as you would be made to believe. No-one likes change. The loss of 60% of hospital beds, the loss of libraries, parks, parking spaces, small business, manufacturing. The increase of housing costs but lack of housing, hardly any police left and all other associated problems, are of a far greater concern then any "invasion". We are ALL affected, ALL the time by these issues.
Crippen. You never give up do you?
Pitiful.
Lux. As full an answer as I can provide, and which I hope will explain my views. You might want to read it fairly quickly, my posts tend to be removed quite often.
Not that they are remotely important.
Demographic change worldwide has always been a concern for the people who consider their land is being "invaded".
When however, it hasn't been invaded (see 1930's Germany) and the "Invasion" scare is propagated by would-be politicians and people online (a new bad medium for such problems), who make "concerns", I fear for society. Not for the issues caused by demographic change - which may not be actual change, but awareness of differences - but for the issues caused by "soldiers" who given the opportunity will do exactly the things that people are worried about the perceived enemy doing.
Causing division - which incidentally positive discrimination does as well, is not a cure for anything.
The divisive nature of this forum is indicative of quite a bit of society as a whole. It always happens when people are suffering or skint, or in some other form of depressed situation. They're looking for blame and some chancers are providing them with it.
Whether the users of this forum or any other daily mail/LBC like it or not, if people had some spare cash and a bit more spare time, they'd be less angry and would care a lot less about politics and we'd have a better state of happiness.
The biggest problem is 40 years of bad government, huge disparity of rich and poor and depleted infrastructure.
The blame doesn't lie with muslims, or benefit scroungers, or whatever the next thing the media and government try to blame it on.
Politicians are having a subsidised drink and a cigarette in the house of commons (the law doesn't apply there) bars and raking it in while watching the population arguing about immigrants, Brexit, Trump or anything else journalists are living off, while we all argue, fight and keep them in power.
To summarise, the demographic change is not as great as you would be made to believe. No-one likes change. The loss of 60% of hospital beds, the loss of libraries, parks, parking spaces, small business, manufacturing. The increase of housing costs but lack of housing, hardly any police left and all other associated problems, are of a far greater concern then any "invasion". We are ALL affected, ALL the time by these issues.
The national Spend on the War against terror must be an Unreal Figure ..
How much is that costing the TAX PAYER ?? Money that could be used on many other things
All those words and study didn't directly answer lux's question.
I never wanted you to say anything. He never mentioned invasion, you invented that bit. He simply asked 'Do you think that demographic change and the attitudes of British Muslims are cause for concern?'
Lux's question to STUDYFORM:
Do you think that demographic change and the attitudes of British Muslims are cause for concern?
He did answer it with this:
Demographic change worldwide has always been a concern for the people who consider their land is being "invaded".
When however, it hasn't been invaded (see 1930's Germany) and the "Invasion" scare is propagated by would-be politicians and people online
and then this:
There isn't a fecking "Invasion", Is that clear enough?
He's turned a blind eye to the demographic change as if it isn't there.
Do you think that demographic change and the attitudes of British Muslims are cause for concern?
He did answer it with this:
Demographic change worldwide has always been a concern for the people who consider their land is being "invaded".
When however, it hasn't been invaded (see 1930's Germany) and the "Invasion" scare is propagated by would-be politicians and people online
and then this:
There isn't a fecking "Invasion", Is that clear enough?
He's turned a blind eye to the demographic change as if it isn't there.
'Invasion' from the interweb..
an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
synonyms: influx, inundation, inrush, rush, flood, torrent, deluge, stream, avalanche
"every year the valley suffers an invasion of cars"
an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.
Mass immigration is clearly a type of invasion. To suggest otherwise is to deny reality.
an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
synonyms: influx, inundation, inrush, rush, flood, torrent, deluge, stream, avalanche
"every year the valley suffers an invasion of cars"
an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.
Mass immigration is clearly a type of invasion. To suggest otherwise is to deny reality.
You see how he resorts to personal attacks the moment he gets himself in a corner.
He'll come back with something unreadable next, which is his usual get out.
He'll come back with something unreadable next, which is his usual get out.
Now anyone who challenges STUDYFORN's tripe is a troll.
I believe, saddo used the term "takeover" earlier.
If it makes you feel better about yourselves, substitute invasion for takeover.
(If unsure injera) look it up.
No crippen. you're the only troll.
If it makes you feel better about yourselves, substitute invasion for takeover.
(If unsure injera) look it up.
No crippen. you're the only troll.
Name calling as usual along with refusing to see the blindingly obvious, even when it's put right under his nose.
Also crippen, making stuff up again. I didn't make personal attacks against anyone, did I?
Well apart from calling you a troll, but that isn't an attack, it's a statement of fact.
Well apart from calling you a troll, but that isn't an attack, it's a statement of fact.
How can you hold a conversation with someone like that?
I didn't make personal attacks against anyone, did I?
Yes you did here:
I'm quite sure you get my meaning and the gist of what I'm saying, saddo.
[i]Leave the trolling to crippen.[/i]
Lol.
Yes you did here:
I'm quite sure you get my meaning and the gist of what I'm saying, saddo.
[i]Leave the trolling to crippen.[/i]
Lol.
Study - I like definitions 
Many words are used without consideration of what they actually mean.
Many words are used without consideration of what they actually mean.
I wouldn't think saddo was insulted by that, crippen, much as you want to garner support.
I'm sure saddo wasn't upset by it.
But why do you have to constantly call people names?
But why do you have to constantly call people names?
Give it up crippen - you're just being extra pitiful. Making more things up.
I didn't post what you quoted did I?
I'll try to be more concise, saddo.
I don't like the immigration, political correctness, changes to society's perceived norms (eg, muslim areas and other "no-go" areas) any more than anyone else.
What I do think though, is that the bigger problem is our government, not any "takeover".
I absolutely DO NOT think the answer to any of our problems lies with "far-right" groups (or however you want to define them). The answer to our problems DOES NOT rest with people like Yaxley or Nick Griffin. There are enough problems without creating extra division.
There aren't too many more ways of saying it.
I didn't post what you quoted did I?
I'll try to be more concise, saddo.
I don't like the immigration, political correctness, changes to society's perceived norms (eg, muslim areas and other "no-go" areas) any more than anyone else.
What I do think though, is that the bigger problem is our government, not any "takeover".
I absolutely DO NOT think the answer to any of our problems lies with "far-right" groups (or however you want to define them). The answer to our problems DOES NOT rest with people like Yaxley or Nick Griffin. There are enough problems without creating extra division.
There aren't too many more ways of saying it.
Invasion is a word asscociated with a military campaign. Men in uniforms with rifles, tanks and air support.
What has failed to take these islands with force is being achieved by stealth:
'Freedom of Movement' - the right to settle in another country and have equal citizenship.
'Migrants' - encompasses both legal and illegal entrants. Come on in. Our country is yours...
'Pluralism' - imposition of all cultures, often at the expense of the existing one.
'Cosmopolitan' - a fancy word meaning globalist i.e no definitive culture nor identity.
'feminism' - under the guise of promoting women it emasculates men, the gender that historically defends a country from INVASION.
As they say..simples.
What has failed to take these islands with force is being achieved by stealth:
'Freedom of Movement' - the right to settle in another country and have equal citizenship.
'Migrants' - encompasses both legal and illegal entrants. Come on in. Our country is yours...
'Pluralism' - imposition of all cultures, often at the expense of the existing one.
'Cosmopolitan' - a fancy word meaning globalist i.e no definitive culture nor identity.
'feminism' - under the guise of promoting women it emasculates men, the gender that historically defends a country from INVASION.
As they say..simples.
I didn't post what you quoted did I?
It's there at 17.19 for all to see.
It's there at 17.19 for all to see.
As things stand, there will one day be a Muslim majority here, and they will take over the running of this country when that happens.
I'd imagine that it won't even require a 'Muslim majority population' to achieve political takeover. Their chosen party just needs to win more seats than the next highest placed party. Labour is already pretty much that party of Compulsory Islam For All. Labour even used to stage Segregated Meetings to suck up to that voting block.
But yes, if and when the numbers are in position, I'd guess The Islam Party would be pretty short odds to take over.
I'd imagine that it won't even require a 'Muslim majority population' to achieve political takeover. Their chosen party just needs to win more seats than the next highest placed party. Labour is already pretty much that party of Compulsory Islam For All. Labour even used to stage Segregated Meetings to suck up to that voting block.
But yes, if and when the numbers are in position, I'd guess The Islam Party would be pretty short odds to take over.
After having their ideology rejected at the ballot box, the chit-chat right wing fanatics are now reduced to scaremongering on the betfair forum. A truly sickening spectacle.
£2 billion Plus on counter-terrorism each year.
Looks like the Government must read this Forum , They certainly appear to think there is a Live and Real threat
Scaremongering ?? I don't think so the fact is there is a small percentage of the Population who Detest and Despise the
Rest of us
Looks like the Government must read this Forum , They certainly appear to think there is a Live and Real threat
Scaremongering ?? I don't think so the fact is there is a small percentage of the Population who Detest and Despise the
Rest of us
People from poor, foreign countries have more access to poor foreign women.
Who knew?
Who knew?
Brown people aren't funny, the great comedians are all white.
I think you mean hate facts Richie.
More holes than a swiss cheese this thread.
More holes than a swiss cheese this thread.
Royal Mail refused to deliver his leaflets. Gotta love living in a free country....
Injera • May 27, 2019 5:45 PM BST
Invasion is a word asscociated with a military campaign. Men in uniforms with rifles, tanks and air support.
What has failed to take these islands with force is being achieved by stealth:
'Freedom of Movement' - the right to settle in another country and have equal citizenship.
'Migrants' - encompasses both legal and illegal entrants. Come on in. Our country is yours...
'Pluralism' - imposition of all cultures, often at the expense of the existing one.
'Cosmopolitan' - a fancy word meaning globalist i.e no definitive culture nor identity.
'feminism' - under the guise of promoting women it emasculates men, the gender that historically defends a country from INVASION.
As they say..simples.
True, we can see that in full display with supposedly full grown men whinging to no end and heavily escalating supposed "dangers". The occident is going to end if we allow gay marriage. Women with equal rights, APOCALPYSE!
Invasion is a word asscociated with a military campaign. Men in uniforms with rifles, tanks and air support.
What has failed to take these islands with force is being achieved by stealth:
'Freedom of Movement' - the right to settle in another country and have equal citizenship.
'Migrants' - encompasses both legal and illegal entrants. Come on in. Our country is yours...
'Pluralism' - imposition of all cultures, often at the expense of the existing one.
'Cosmopolitan' - a fancy word meaning globalist i.e no definitive culture nor identity.
'feminism' - under the guise of promoting women it emasculates men, the gender that historically defends a country from INVASION.
As they say..simples.
True, we can see that in full display with supposedly full grown men whinging to no end and heavily escalating supposed "dangers". The occident is going to end if we allow gay marriage. Women with equal rights, APOCALPYSE!
and don't get me started on the alt-right. 4Chan internet crybabies the lot of them.
I think someone needs to learn the difference between a purely peefed off comment that would show someone has gotten under someone's skin and a sensationally humourous take on someone else's parody post.
Ah, I realize why you didn't get it. You need 
to properly understand posts 
I'll try to always add them for clarity from now on for you.
to properly understand posts I'll try to always add them for clarity from now on for you.
You need LaughLaughCrazyCrazyExcitedExcitedExcitedExcited to properly understand posts
Okay edy baby, let's take a look.
and don't get me started on the alt-right. 4Chan internet crybabies the lot of them.
So the right haven't been getting to you?
Fair enough. So what was that sarcarm?
Okay edy baby, let's take a look.
and don't get me started on the alt-right. 4Chan internet crybabies the lot of them.
So the right haven't been getting to you?
Fair enough. So what was that sarcarm?
If you put on your reading glasses and look very, very closely you will be bound to notice that I wrote alt-right and not just right.
The right I fully respect. I've voted right many a times in my life, included in recent time. The alt-right however are just lame and for me they drag the right and conservatism down. They're doing the right and conservatism a massive disservice. They're a bunch of giant supposedly grown up crybabies, conspiracy loons, always eager to display themselves and white people as poor lil victims of everyone, confuse being a conservative with being a turd sandwich. At the same time they're bigger trolls than you and me combined.
It's pathetic really.
The right I fully respect. I've voted right many a times in my life, included in recent time. The alt-right however are just lame and for me they drag the right and conservatism down. They're doing the right and conservatism a massive disservice. They're a bunch of giant supposedly grown up crybabies, conspiracy loons, always eager to display themselves and white people as poor lil victims of everyone, confuse being a conservative with being a turd sandwich. At the same time they're bigger trolls than you and me combined.
It's pathetic really.
That's why I always make sure to differentiate and call them "conspiracy nutjob wannabe conservatives" instead of...conservatives.
and don't get me started on the alt-right. 4Chan internet crybabies the lot of them.
Given your recent barrage of attacks directed at your right-wing antagonists elsewhere that you refer to as neo-Nazis, and even more abuse directed towards them in your last post, who else could that line above in bold be about?
I stick by my original comment.
I think someone has got under edy's skin.
Given your recent barrage of attacks directed at your right-wing antagonists elsewhere that you refer to as neo-Nazis, and even more abuse directed towards them in your last post, who else could that line above in bold be about?
I stick by my original comment.
I think someone has got under edy's skin.
Your conclusion making is rather misguided. Not that we didn't know this already with you loving yourself the most bizarre of conspiracy theories and theories about former/alternative usernames.
All the nonsense you wrote about me not understanding the post, was an attempt to hide the fact that people writing about you elsewhere, have upset you.
And your post was just another swipe at them.
So when I teased with - ''I think someone has got under edy's skin.'' You knew exactly whom I was referring to.
But your vanity wouldn't allow you to leave it at that.
So now your fury at the attacks from your tormenters, are clear to everybody on the forum who reads this.
Which I find most amusing.
So as my amusement grows at observing your efforts to conceal the fact that they've got to you.
And your post was just another swipe at them.
So when I teased with - ''I think someone has got under edy's skin.'' You knew exactly whom I was referring to.
But your vanity wouldn't allow you to leave it at that.
So now your fury at the attacks from your tormenters, are clear to everybody on the forum who reads this.
Which I find most amusing.
So as my amusement grows at observing your efforts to conceal the fact that they've got to you.
My first post was obviously a slight dig at Injera. The post that followed up was obviously about the people that sadly managed to manipulate a formerly good, proper and sensible conservative like Injera into believing the things he does these days. As I said, your conclusion-making does need some tweaking.
Hence, when you said "I think someone has got under edy's skin." my natural conclusion, and that of most people I would assume, was that you were talking about Injera. I'm sorry for getting that wrong.
Either way, if you revel in and take delight from the thought you and your neo-nazi boyfriend are the puppeteers behind me constantly making fun of you fellas, absolutely be my guest and continue manipulating me into making fun of you. It makes me tragically sad.
Hence, when you said "I think someone has got under edy's skin." my natural conclusion, and that of most people I would assume, was that you were talking about Injera. I'm sorry for getting that wrong.
Either way, if you revel in and take delight from the thought you and your neo-nazi boyfriend are the puppeteers behind me constantly making fun of you fellas, absolutely be my guest and continue manipulating me into making fun of you. It makes me tragically sad.
edy • May 31, 2019 10:49 AM BST
....... you and your neo-nazi boyfriend .......
It's labels and phrases such as this that keep me amused on here
....... you and your neo-nazi boyfriend .......
It's labels and phrases such as this that keep me amused on here
I'm sorry for getting that wrong.
Well you did get it wrong, and in spectacular fashion.
Well you did get it wrong, and in spectacular fashion.
But I gracefully accept your apology and forgive you.
There is that better now.
There is that better now.
May 31, 2019 -- 11:10AM, Dr Crippen wrote:
I'm sorry for getting that wrong.Well you did get it wrong, and in spectacular fashion.
Yes, as I said, I'm sorry for assuming that you had any sense and knew I wasn't talking about Coxy there...in a post that was a direct response to Injera. I should've really known better and can only apologize.
May 31, 2019 -- 11:06AM, Reynard wrote:
edy • May 31, 2019 10:49 AM BST....... you and your neo-nazi boyfriend .......It's labels and phrases such as this that keep me amused on here
Don't worry, Reynard, I don't apply the label loosely. Or have you seen me do it? I strictly reserve it for people that proudly present themselves with SS insignia (outside of halloween) and threaten me with the gas chamber, among some other neo-nazi things
Again, if you take comfort from the "good knowledge" that you and Cowardly Coxy are pulling the strings behind me taking the urine with you, absolutely be my guest and continue. I can only welcome that.
Just saying edy.
You're the one calling names and making accusations.
I don't do stuff like that. I leave it to the likes of you.
You're the one calling names and making accusations.
I don't do stuff like that. I leave it to the likes of you.
Really, Crippen, I think I've told you about a dozen times before, but you're the last person on this forum that can use the eternal innocent victim act that you oh so like to put on.
Looks like edy has accused himself in his last but one post.
He even spells out what he's been up to
And is his outburst here not simply another blatant attempt along the same lines?
He even spells out what he's been up to
And is his outburst here not simply another blatant attempt along the same lines?
I have not accused myself of anything. I merely listed your baseless accusations towards me that are entirely the creation of your imagination. The same imagination that has given us gems regarding the moon landing clearly being faked because some guy wouldn't besmirch the bible on behalf of some conspiracy loon, or that the BBC has purposefully put Question Time into a majorily jewish area, and invited a majorily jewish crowd, to get to one of the guests that night.
You don't have to worry about me at all, Crippen. In addition to never reporting anyone anyway, I enjoy you in particularly far too much to want you banned. A big part of me would die if you were to be banned again. That's why I offered to be your personal Jiminy Cricket and protect you from yourself while you mature.
You don't have to worry about me at all, Crippen. In addition to never reporting anyone anyway, I enjoy you in particularly far too much to want you banned. A big part of me would die if you were to be banned again. That's why I offered to be your personal Jiminy Cricket and protect you from yourself while you mature.
All the nastiness and bile are coming from you edy. (''your new boyfriend neo-nazi that you admire so much''
)
I merely pointed out that your slanging match with someone elsewhere was getting to you.
Which showed from you numerous references to it here.
Then in revenge you launched an unjustified attack on me.
And I see another swipe at me in your last sentence above, which proves my point.
)
I merely pointed out that your slanging match with someone elsewhere was getting to you.
Which showed from you numerous references to it here.
Then in revenge you launched an unjustified attack on me.
And I see another swipe at me in your last sentence above, which proves my point.
May 31, 2019 -- 12:36PM, edy wrote:
Really, Crippen, I think I've told you about a dozen times before, but you're the last person on this forum that can use the eternal innocent victim act that you oh so like to put on.
.
Although it was decent of you to point out that Betfair were unfair to ban me for writing something that others write without any action being taken against them.
I appreiciate that.
I appreiciate that.
Whos is the neo nazi? Hope it's not me - I don't approve of national socialism.
Injera 27 May 19 13:57
Tommy got 40k votes.
He was banned from Facebook, Twitter, You Tube, Snapchat and Instagram. He couldn't raise money in any conventional way like other candidates. He was given little or no air time by the MSM.
The appalling scenes in Oldham where Greater Manchester Plod ESCORTED 2-300 Muslim Defence League men miles to where Tommy held a rally were not given coverage.. They threw bricks and bottles and children and women had to flee.
They smashed up a panda car and at one point 5 of them attacked one man.
If this had been any other candidate it would have been headline news for days if not weeks.
I'd say 40k was a great effort.
Er....he got 2171 votes.
Trust this helps
Tommy got 40k votes.
He was banned from Facebook, Twitter, You Tube, Snapchat and Instagram. He couldn't raise money in any conventional way like other candidates. He was given little or no air time by the MSM.
The appalling scenes in Oldham where Greater Manchester Plod ESCORTED 2-300 Muslim Defence League men miles to where Tommy held a rally were not given coverage.. They threw bricks and bottles and children and women had to flee.
They smashed up a panda car and at one point 5 of them attacked one man.
If this had been any other candidate it would have been headline news for days if not weeks.
I'd say 40k was a great effort.
Er....he got 2171 votes.
Trust this helps
easier to rabble rouse in the North where he thinks there are more dumb racists
Interesting 'fact' from Facts . Not a 'fact' at all but I guess there are lies , damn lies and factistics 
If Tommy was a pawn of Reyno, how would you of campaigned him better?
If Tommy was a pawn of Reyno, how would you of campaigned him better?
I'd have employed a professional speech writer and sent him for lessons in diction .
38,908 for an independent is an awful lot of votes.
Some on here would argue that 38,908 for Mr Robinson is a lot of awful votes
I'd have employed a professional speech writer and sent him for lessons in diction .
38,908 for an independent is an awful lot of votes.
Some on here would argue that 38,908 for Mr Robinson is a lot of awful votes
Agree with the diction thing, also make his hands a bit more quiet.
Jun 1, 2019 -- 11:06PM, Dr Crippen wrote:
38,908 for an independent is an awful lot of votes.
it's no Martin Bell, 2004 East of England candidate or Jan Jananayagam, 2009 London candidate imo
of course, the more embarrassing thing was that he even lost to Change UK
Katie Hopkins only got just under 9k back in 2009, so it's a good haul in comparison
Lol nick griffin held the seat from 2009-2014 perhaps they aren't sure what kind of race hate they prefer muslims or jews as nick griffin was antesemetic as well..incredibly dumb people!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktyYXbGI3Ms
Obscured view unfortunately, but doesn't look a bad dig if truth be told. Nice and tight, short, sharp and explosive. Better than those girly punches he was throwing at Ascot a few years back. Perhaps he's been taking lessons?
Obscured view unfortunately, but doesn't look a bad dig if truth be told. Nice and tight, short, sharp and explosive. Better than those girly punches he was throwing at Ascot a few years back. Perhaps he's been taking lessons?
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539