|
By:
"JC - surely you don't think anyone on here would actually call AN far right?"
I never said that, but I'm sure there are 3 chidlish left wing trolls on here who would. One of those 3 just did it int a mealy mouthed way. |
|
By:
"The fact that people go out of their way to have SF's posts deleted - that in itself tells you he won the debate/point in hand."
This is of course an extremely illogical thing to say. By that sort of total non argument Tommy Robinson has won his argument by getting kicked off facebook, and the Germans ban Mein Kampf becuase they can't handle the truth. "He who is deleted is right". I don't agree with what I just said of course, I'm just pointing out it doesn't make sense. (And it's not me reporting SF, I've no idea what is going on there). |
|
By:
"Summed Jones up quite well imo."
My description of Jones is very widely accepted, I find it surprising it's even controversial, he's an infamously petulant infamously childish, a very far leftie and doesn't seem to understand basic facts so just repeats rehearsted far left arguments. He's quite relevant to Neil actually as first time I remember seeing him he came on this week and was allowed to present the shows recorded piece. In this piece he did his usual leftie b/s and got his facts wrong (or outright deliberately lied) and Neil being Neil he then proceeded to tear into him in the discussion afterwards WITH facts and Jones made to look a right t1t. Which he did not like one little petulant bit. THe little lip came out. I'm guessing the precious dear didn't forget this which is why in a later appeareance he tried ignoring the subject he was brought on for and tried a personal attack line on Neil.. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
ask any self-defined far leftie, commie, M-L type what they think of Owen Jones politics and they will laugh at you if you think they are similar
|
|
By:
No it's not you. but I lose about half of what I write.
I also appreciate you don't think I'm Yaxley or Hitler. Of course you could have a point about the argument that you call a "non-argument" because you don't agree with it. Equally though, you could be wrong. (I say equally, but the amount of right to wrong for some people is not equal). I happen to agree with Scandinavian's post ![]() My moan at you can be summed up with your 12.18 post. It's incessant. If you had any other subject to discuss, there's no way you'd repeat it over and over and over again like you do with this stuff. Don't you think everyone who comes near this forum doesn't know your feelings about the BBC/C4/Owen Jones/Corbyn/lefties/Andrew Neil yet? |
|
By:
"The lord of the forum hath spoken" and verily, nobody gave a sh1t.
|
|
By:
It doesn't matter who gives a sht.
Not about what I write, nor what you write. Which is kind of what I'm trying to say. |