|
By:
she shiuld just go now, her husband is looking for a way for
her to leave with dignity. dignity just left town, but , ... |
|
By:
she's infuiated so many today chances are the bill will suffer it's heaviest defeat in the 4 tries it's had
|
|
By:
yep most tories now just want rid asap and the prospect of a 2nd referendum tacked on will scare off even some of the more moderate MPs from supporting it
taking incompetence to a whole new level |
|
By:
It's not really a prospect of a 2nd referendum though is it. It's actually a devious plan, not that it will work. But May realises there's no majority for anything so if you try and win over votes by promising the chance to vote on what people want later, she can just whip against all amendments and all will lose. Of course no-one is actually stupid enough to fall for this plan I imagine.
May's problem is she's tried to play the middle ground, but it's never gonna work at this point. There is no reason for the 2nd referendum brigade to back this as the time game is in their favour anyway, and it's obviously going to annoy Brexiteers, but tbh I think a bunch of them would have just wanted any excuse to why they changed their vote again anyway, as I'm pretty sure a number weren't voting for this regardless with a leadership challenge imminent. A new PM isn't going to solve anything anyway. |
|
By:
At least two years too late in trying to reach out to the other side of the house.
Shambles doesn't even begin to do the current situation justice. |
|
By:
"A new PM isn't going to solve anything anyway"
i've heard the nonsense above for nay on 2 years; for it's that long that i - & others have doubted the nutcases ability. I for one, never wanted her as PM; she was a crap HS & when she backed out of the Lancaster House agreement in January 2017; the demon seed was sewn. If she had been usurped then do you really think it wouldn't have made any difference? When she came up with her WA plan in November 2018 it was less than a month before she deferred putting it to the House because she knew what reception it would receive. Why, you may ask, did she sign it then i hear you ask (except all the media) well wouldn't we all like to know that? Could it be she was acting on instruction? Or maybe the bureacratic loving remainer just wanted to drag her country into an abyss of confusion. Would Parliament & the county be in such turmoil if she had been booted out last December? No is the answer to that particular question. You see it is no good saying it wouldn't make any difference then or now who was PM of this country; when the simple & plain fact is it would. If the insinuation is that the same problems will still exist for the new PM as it did for the nutcase; then yes they would, but as you will have someone different in charge, with a different outlook. personality, & most importantly agenda; how on earth can a new PM not make a difference? Two nutcases directly following each other into No10 would surely be 1000/1, would it not? Or maybe the people who say "A new PM isn't going to solve anything anyway" don't want an end to the turmoil & confusion? |
|
By:
I was talking in the context of now. Though in the way you are talking, also no. It was way too late by December as well to make a difference.
What is a new PM going to do, come in, try to get a new deal out of the EU, fail to get one, then attempt to take us out with no deal and fail with that as well as parliament will always reject it. It's made worse by a hard Brexiteer is likely to come in as next PM, the only way to solve Brexit in the house is for someone to come in and actually try to work with the house to find a majority (only likely existing on something like common market 2.0 or something in that ilk), neither Boris or Raab will do this, they will only fail faster than Theresa May has. |
|
By:
I was going to give you a full explanatory reply until I read your last 2 lines, that would now be a waste of time. On a more sensible & adult note; she may be gone by the weekend
|
|
By:
they're going to need bolt cutters to get her out of number 10, she's going to chain herself to the railings
That would be the most apt why for it end, literally being carted off in the nut van |
|
By:
ids says she is holed up with sofa against the door
dignity ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
She's going to need counselling after this
|
|
By:
The grey suits have arrived
|
|
By:
The grey suits have arrived
|
|
By:
Grey suits?
She's an old grey woman with a hunch back, your gonna need riot police in there ![]() |
|
By:
white suits required
|
|
By:
The chief whip has asked for her resignation & she refused
|
|
By:
The chief whip has asked for her resignation & she refused
|
|
By:
She's refusing to go
![]() This could get real good to be fair, she might end up getting dragged out on national TV |
|
By:
won't be long now. There are plans afoot
|
|
By:
sas on bank holiday monday
shes snookered... |
|
By:
none of the current cabinet should be allowed to stand in the leadership contest. weak beyond belief that they didn't demand she went months ago
|
|
By:
left downing street according to twitter
might just be getting some groceries... |
|
By:
Mafeking is my long lost brother. Brady going to see her Friday
|
|
By:
I cannot wrap my head around it
She just will not go she's the most hated PM in history, nobody wants her there and she's trying to book meetings for Friday ![]() ![]() Absolutely mental |
|
By:
Put the shampoo on ice. Once the grey suits move we're talking about days, rather than weeks. I still think she will go by the weekend
|
|
By:
still needs a few days to get past gordon brown's equally woeful premiership. hardly think that a badge of honour worth having
|
|
By:
I forgot about that. Maybe she would try to beat Broonys stay
|
|
By:
shes lowered his popularity, and will get another record tomorrow.
can we have no pm, or will she remain in office whilst leadership contest is carried out? |
|
By:
talk of a 'caretaker' PM doing the rounds. The grey suits don't even want her to stay until they choose a new PM. That will really have peed her off; & is probably why a grappling hook will be needed on Friday
|
|
By:
they need a steady pair of hands for a short while, talk of lidington, i'd prefer grayling
![]() |
|
By:
that would be like replacing shat with puke taking Lidington. I'd prefer Fester Grayling for comedy value
![]() |
|
By:
Steady pair of hands you say?
Give it Giggsy until the end of June? |
|
By:
leadsom resigned
|
|
By:
c4 news ^^^^
|
|
By:
leadsome leaving a sinking ship
she did put up with some difficult situations caused by mays some what unorthodox tabling of commons business. |
|
By:
probably 'touching up' her cv (again) before she launches her bid
|
|
By:
well well loathsome gone. This could be one of the best weeks of my political life
|
|
By:
leadsome is 36th minister to resign under may...
|
|
By:
Outlining her reasons, she said:
1. I do not believe that we will be a truly sovereign United Kingdom through the deal that is now proposed. 2. I have always maintained that a second referendum would be dangerously divisive, and I do not support the government willingly facilitating such a concession. It would risk undermining the Union, which is something I passionately want to see strengthened. 3. There has been such a breakdown of government processes that recent Brexit-related legislative proposals have not been properly scrutinised or approved by cabinet members. 4.The tolerance to those in cabinet who have advocated policies contrary to the government's position has led to a complete breakdown of collective responsibility. |
|
By:
this is one of the ways the grappling hook might not be needed; as in if she loses her Cabinet by say 4 or 5 resignations
|