|
By:
Suffice to say, it got messy
![]() |
|
By:
Then he went back to his flock as if butter wouldn't melt.
|
|
By:
Butter doesn't work on sheep only humans....ooops
|
|
By:
Nice girl. She must be horny all the time. Let her in I say. Very pretty.
|
|
By:
kevo • February 15, 2019 12:21 AM GMT
Don't patronise me Reynard as I am fully aware of the specifics of these crimes and how the lack of investigation by the regional police forces at that time is still a national disgrace, and I'm surprised that a juditionall enquiry has never been held. With all due respect. Apologies , kevo , but I thought you were suggesting that she may have become a victim of a grooming gang ![]() |
|
By:
UBLE/REGY
15 Feb 19 00:04 Joined: 11 Mar 10 | Topic/replies: 1,098 | Blogger: UBLE/REGY's blog I see on the red button, the women has been told she could face prosecution if she returns home. It was illegal for her to go out there in the first place. It is probably the best she can hope for. If we let her in she has had a result imo. I would think her parents would care for her baby until her punishment is over. ^ Her parents looked after her and look what happened there? The reality is they were children when they left. Children. Can a child commit a crime of running away? This was a high profile case due to it being three children going to IS. Fighters have been allowed back in under the radar. It is not a big story because it is not as 'interesting' as three children going to be 'brides'. If we allow fighters back in how can we not let her back? |
|
By:
She's in a refugee camp right now, correct? Good, let her stay there.
Btw, are airlines allowed to fly people so close to giving birth? |
|
By:
425 Isis fighters had returned to the UK by October 2017..
'But there are fears many have “disappeared” from the view of security services, who will not publicly confirm how many returnees have been jailed or are being tracked.' https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/isis-british-jihadis-return-uk-iraq-syria-report-islamic-state-fighters-europe-threat-debate-terror-a8017811.html Yet the main focus seems to be on this one story of the 3 15 year olds. |
|
By:
Also, I heard she was one of these "grade A" students we hear so much about.
In that case, she knew EXACTLY what she was doing aged fifteen ![]() |
|
By:
Every little helps, IT and we need to start somewhere.
|
|
By:
Have BBC reported that the unborn child is a "promising footballer" yet?
|
|
By:
She will be back our Human Right teams will see to that , Spread on Sprogs over the next 10 years 5.5 / 6
Suitable housing housing and Benefits to nurture the promising youngsters . |
|
By:
England is doing away with itself
|
|
By:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3027035/Father-runaway-jihadi-schoolgirl-filmed-burning-flag-protest-admits-attending-says-took-daughter-demonstration-just-13.ht
|
|
By:
Reynard • February 15, 2019 11:15 AM GMT
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3027035/Father-runaway-jihadi-schoo... Is there a charge for lying to / misleading Parliament ? The mind boggles at the front of these cnts ![]() |
|
By:
Very VERY pleased to see there is talk of stripping her passport or removing her nationality. Fantastic common sense if this happens.
|
|
By:
The issue being that she was almost certainly radicalised by her 'father'
![]() |
|
By:
rilby22 Joined: 21 Aug 10
Replies: 24709 15 Feb 19 10:36 She's in a refugee camp right now, correct? Good, let her stay there. Btw, are airlines allowed to fly people so close to giving birth? A lot of African ladies seem to arrive here when almost full term. I think they call it health tourism. |
|
By:
No doubt the father will be allowed to remain here, what a cess pit this country has become because of this religion.
|
|
By:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ because of this ideology .
|
|
By:
What is her issue with coming through the regular migrants channel? Are pregnant women not allowed to travel on dinghies?
|
|
By:
Could she not do what the majority of other fake refugees do when they get here - pretend they are a 16 year old boy?
|
|
By:
I saw on one of the paper headlines today, she is not the only jihadi bride who wants to return.
She was married to a TERRORIST the last thing this country wants are TERRORISTS. of whatever ilk. One accepts she may not have done any acts of terrorism herself but she is was married to someone who did. It would be best she did not return , although if she stays in Syria and Assad wins, she may not be safe there. Be risky to accept her back even with a minimum 2 year prison term and deprogramming???????????????????????? Just my own opinion. |
|
By:
We could accept her baby, if her parents are willing to look after it.
|
|
By:
Her parents did such a good job with her didnt they
![]() |
|
By:
UBLE/REGY • February 15, 2019 1:04 PM GMT
We could accept her baby, if her parents are willing to look after it. Check the link I posted . There is evidence to suggest that HER FATHER RADICALISED HER ! |
|
By:
Who knows, If they radicalised her, they cannot have any complaints.
We have the internet know, that could have radicalised her????? |
|
By:
Not much point in her coming back then Reynard, if you say that is true.
Perhpas it would be better if her parents went out to join her. |
|
By:
She's British so Britain are legally obliged to accept her regardless unless she'd could be persuade to return to Ethiopia (with inducements). And if she poses more threat to the British people in the UK then she must be kept under lock-and-key for some considerable time, and stringent monitoring and conditions imposed post that.
|
|
By:
Send the whole family back to Ethiopia or where they came here from, Germany.
|
|
By:
I thought we passed a law banning ISIS here, obviously not
International law does not allow for people to be deprived of their nationality. That is where the United States score they send them to Guantamano bay and never release them. |
|
By:
If she committed a crime it was on Syrian soil. She should stand trial there. Perhaps the Russians will keep her safe until the legitimate government re-establishes full control over its territory.
|
|
By:
I read recently that Saudi Arabia prohibits Christian worship. Seems an excellent policy and one we should adopt by banning the Islamic religion and dismantling the mosques forthwith.
|
|
By:
There's a fair chance the Saudi policy will be enacted here one day. Decreed in Arabic too.
|
|
By:
Will they burn all the crosses?
|
|
By:
It might be possible to reuse some of them. Waste not, want not.
|
|
By:
Sure Wetherspoons could convert some of the mosques.
|
|
By:
I remember reading (AFAIR) that saudi has taken in precisely zero of all these "refugees" flooding Europe (neither has Iran?), and has payed nothing to help the refugess or give aid for their camps, what it has done ... it's payed for new mosques to be built for them in Germany. That is of course SOP for them. And as is widely reported and discussed, the strain of the religon they push is shall we say "controversial" and repeatedly linked to radicals.
|
|
By:
Just Checking - What you read is correct . Germany is not the only beneficiary
![]() |
|
By:
In fact I'm fairly sure Iran hasn't either as it was a stand out hypocrisy as at one point Iran was lambasting Hungary for not wanting to take syrian muslim refugees, when Iran itself, a muslim country, had taken in ZERO. It was noted at the time.
|