Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 58 comments are related to the topic:
UK's first conviction for FGM

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 58
By:
Reynard
When: 01 Feb 19 17:55
Injera - If you want to assess the cost of subsequent healthcare given to the tens of thousands of victims of this heinous crime then I really wouldn't like to put a figure on it Plain
By:
moisok
When: 01 Feb 19 17:57
box  - the unkindest cut  and how appropriate for this topic

I hadn't realised you had converted
By:
Injera
When: 01 Feb 19 17:57
Very good point. Then there's the legal aid...
By:
knot in wood
When: 01 Feb 19 17:57
iv'e always wondered:

but how many people do we DEPORT every year.
By:
boxingthefox
When: 01 Feb 19 17:59

Feb 1, 2019 -- 11:57AM, moisok wrote:


box  - the unkindest cut  and how appropriate for this topicI hadn't realised you had converted


I thought you had done it! I was just following your lead, or so I thought, laters.

By:
Reynard
When: 01 Feb 19 18:01
Legal aid only kicks in when a prosecution is undertaken . Bearing in mind this was only the 3rd case to go to court (two previous prosecutions resulted in acquittal) the costs 'post investigation' are minimal .
That's raises the question of how the CPS came to the conclusion they had sufficient evidence to prosecute on two previous occasions only for the defendants to be found not guilty ? Confused
By:
saddo
When: 01 Feb 19 18:06
knot in wood, pertinent question, REPORTED
By:
knot in wood
When: 01 Feb 19 18:13
Shocked i wont log out then.Laugh

must be double figures surely or have we given up with that project.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 04 Feb 19 16:48
On about this on Vic Derbyshire this morning.
Someone said the way to stop it, is to make it the law to examine children to see if it's been done. Because they're doing it to children so young now that they don't have any recall of it. So they must be on about doing it to babies.

Of course the usual suspects were on shouting ''cultural targeting'' and there must be another way.

But it's perfectly straightforward, simply examine all kids from certain backgrounds and if they've been done it's off to jail for their parents, and if they plead that it was done abroad, too bad.   


This is another case of the authorities allowing unlawful practices to be performed right under their noses.
What a sick society we have become, in the name of immigration.
By:
donny osmond
When: 04 Feb 19 16:53
locking them up is one solution but its too late for the poor kids

got to stop it happening
By:
treetop
When: 04 Feb 19 16:57
We need to set an example to prevent this behaviour.kids getting ruined.
By:
saddo
When: 04 Feb 19 17:01
Also, no mention of young boys forced to undergo circumcision, butchery also imo.
By:
saddo
When: 04 Feb 19 17:01
Also, no mention of young boys forced to undergo circumcision, butchery also imo.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 04 Feb 19 17:07
Exactly treetop, the way to stop it happening is to jail their parents and send out a message.
Which would slash the number of new cases as the word went out.
By:
Injera
When: 04 Feb 19 17:22
France take a tougher stance. I believe girls are examined regularly up until a certain age.

Dr C is right. Target certain communities and bollox to the PC garbage that has made matters worse.
'They' prefer FGM to continue than name the problem communities and deal with them.

Male circumcision is different gravy altogether. FGM is a clear practice of sexual inequality at the earliest opportunity. It is abhorrent. Sad
By:
saddo
When: 04 Feb 19 17:26
I'll agree to differ. Ask the lads at 18 if they want some chopping off, not many takers is my guess.
By:
Injera
When: 04 Feb 19 17:34
I looked into FGM online this morning and found it a hard read... The motives, practice and long term physical and mental damage is sickening.

Oh for the day the Luvvies campaign on such an issue. At present they're too busy opposing wolf whistles and men who explain to them how to change the oil.
By:
moisok
When: 04 Feb 19 17:51
So why would they being culturally targeting.  Who is doing it anyway.  Old bert who drinks with me down the local 'spoons'???

If you suspect and have evidence it is cultural (which it is) then target them.  Tough on crime and all that garbage.
By:
moisok
When: 04 Feb 19 17:52
so why would they be cultural targeting   doh!!!
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com