Nov 23, 2018 -- 12:34AM, smirnoff2therescue wrote:
Scanda ive recently had a liver resection so guess again the username was a p1sstake
He probably thinks your Gazza.





Nov 23, 2018 -- 12:44AM, scandanavian_haven wrote:
I wasn't thinkng of your username smirnoff, you just seem very erratic and rude, so assume you were drunk like Superjingoistic, as it turns out, looks like that's just your normal behaviour, rude and aggressive.do you think it's wrong that young girls are being drugged and raped by grooming gangs particularly of a Pakistani Muslim heritage?Is there any reason that you're asking a question that has such an obvious answer? all of these criminals that have been caught in said towns are now being dealt with by the law.
So why is it wrong for anyone to demonise them on here which is an anonymous public forum?
I'd imagine people did the same on here with the white rapists posted above?
What do you get out of trying to defend the honour of these types it's such an important issue which although has been touched on in the mainstream gets nowhere near enough coverage.
It'd be better if we heard more from the Pakistani and Muslim cultures condemning said crimes and it might reduce the amount of interest the subject gets on forums like this.




Nov 23, 2018 -- 12:58AM, scandanavian_haven wrote:
You begin to lose my attention with you persist in blurring what I've said or what I think when you come up with this crap What do you get out of trying to defend the honour of these types Can you now go and find any one of posts where I have 'defended their honour'.Secondly, you just said such an important issue which although has been touched on in the mainstream gets nowhere near enough coverage.yest earlier on at 00:24 you said The reason that Asian paedo threads are on here are because they AREN'T in the media and get no coverage due to the type of dishonest thinking the likes of you So in the space of 27 minutes, the amount of coverage of the Asian p@edo rings has gone from, and I quote "No coverage" to "nowhere near enough coverage" This is typical of you today, constantly twisting things, putting words into my mouth, making stuff up and now shifting the goalposts as demonstrated above.What happened during those 27 minutes, is that I pointed out that the BBC have covered these stories in all of these affected towns, and there are plenty of links to prove it.You're really not worth my time.
Touched on is a bit different to the cooverage Saville,Barry Bennell etc. got and 19 of the 20 guilty didn't get a mention in my area just the mentally ill white girl so I'm twisting fcuk all.

Nov 23, 2018 -- 1:03AM, scandanavian_haven wrote:
so now we've moved on to what the coverage was in your area Your area doesn't receive BBC, a place where internet access goes down when asian p@edo rings stories goes up?I can't believe I'm even trying to reason with you and the smirnoff who really should take himself back off to the Horse Racing forum, he fits in well there.
Yes the BBC coverage in my area did a large feature where the only person who was shown in depth with interviews from locals and family was the white woman,none of the 19 Pakistani men were even mentioned by name suppose you think that's in depth balanced coverage.












Nov 23, 2018 -- 1:10AM, smirnoff2therescue wrote:
fred needs a song .......common apparently.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeldvNxpW44ooooossssss
Still haven't watched the series.




Nov 23, 2018 -- 11:31AM, scandanavian_haven wrote:
As posted on this thread, you were already caught out lying/bending the truth as pointed out in my last post at 00:58, no coverage to not enough coverage to not in my areahave a day off and take smirnoff with you.
walos you are obviously a clown of the highest order,on top of this where was the media coverage of the trial that Tommy Robinson was arrested at?
you cannot provide the evidence, unsurprising as I've already shown you to be a liar.





Nov 23, 2018 -- 5:51PM, scandanavian_haven wrote:
By the way I will ask for a 6th timeWhere is the post where you said that I, and I quote "defending the honour of these types"In your own time, I am waiting.
This has already been answered above as you know unlike the forgoten questions you keep sweeping.
By attempting to knock people who criticise paedos on anonymous forum because they are a race or religion you can't speak negatively of THAT IS DEFENDING THEIR HONOUR in my book.
November 23, 2018 5:10 PM GMT
In my opinion not criticising paedos and knocking those who do is defending their honour you aren't exactly against it are you which is something else everyone can see.
That doesn't make me a liar it makes you someone who is ok with pedophilia if the right people are the perpetrators.
Calling you a f@nny is nothing as an insult but I can see why someone as sensitive as yourself would consider that more serious.
And you've still not answered my questions above either.
Nov 23, 2018 -- 6:02PM, Dr Crippen wrote:
Wont be wasting any more time with you and Crippen, like are two peas in a pod and I'm pretty sure you're the same person, amusing how you talk to each other in a desperate attempt to make it appear otherwiseLaugh Don't recall ever crossing swords with you, except when I pulled you up for introducing racism into a thread.
He called me as much for having a pop at Mel B on November 6th which was nowt to do with race and out of the blue,then has a go at me saying I insulted him for saying he was an 'acceptable racist' and the 'forum f@nny' irony is lost on this clown.


- Bernard was a legend and hey do i giv a fookif if a fruit loop doesnt like it 



















- been on plenty train journeys in my time but never witnessed nowt like it 

