Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 794 comments are related to the topic:
9/11 seventeen years on
9/11 seventeen years on
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 794
|
By:
Great vid again Dyno, nothing is what it seems .
|
|
By:
Glad you got something from it Terry.Have you reviewed the Bill Cooper one yet ? Unreal that is
|
|
By:
Let's just say......He knew
|
|
By:
There's always clues in movies and TV shows as well. With 9-11 there were massive clues in many a movie, but the ones I remember right now are the simpsons, with bart holding $9 in front of the twin towers (making the 11 in 9-11). There have been numerous refernces with clocks being at 11 mins past 9 such as in the 'back to the future' movie.
Remember the old addage, The news is fiction and the truth is in the movies. The Simpsons also famously 'predicted' Trump being elected President. |
|
By:
Caution 9-11 (Terminator 2)
|
|
By:
911 is also their emergency service number so I guess they could pass that off as that.
This clip is 7 years old questioning Larry Silverstein, you can see how guilty he is in body language alone https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJsEGgc5L2c he also didn't deny that he asked for the building to be pulled when it was put to him. |
|
By:
And 17 years of BS & the tin-foil loons still won't even try to explain what they believed happened.
It really should be on page one of any theory, yet ask a "truther" what they believe DID happen & they start to cry and sweaty. Rather than explain what happened we get pages of waffle about ilrelevant side shows- Simpsons, Wtc7, pull it, mobile phones, photos, 2 passports. If you don't believe 4 planes crashed on 9-11 (and there is a massive amount of evidence to suggest they did) then... What do you believe DID happen ? |
|
By:
of course there were planes.
What do you believe happened to wtc7? Do you beleive it was the result of a fire or a demolition job planned months in advance? |
|
By:
Aspro • October 8, 2018 5:22 PM BST
Caution 9-11 (Terminator 2) Yes! That's another one (Bridge Clearance 9'11'') |
|
By:
Yeah, some rookie 'pilots' from a foreign country who learned to fly on Microsoft Flightsim managed to hijack two planes, navigate their way to NYC, find the WTC, then fly unerringly into the buildings.
 Yeah right  |
|
By:
Sh
You may believe it is obvious that planes crashed on 9-11. There is a massive amount of evidence to support this theory. I believe Wtc7 is an ilrelevant sideshow & not worth getting distracted by hence I don't waste hours watching heavily edited, misleading loon-tube videos As you can see fro Drink's posts , there are people who don't believe planes crashed. You of course these "truthers " won't answer the most basic question What do you believe SID happen. |
|
By:
My sincere advice to those who dispute the official version of events would be to focus on the building collapses, not distracted by other speculative theories.
Scientific facts are tough to debunk. A falling body cannot follow the path of most resistance. All three towers, therefore, must have been primed to implode, it is the only plausible explanation. |
|
By:
strange that a conspiracy that has seriously compelling evidence to say that putin was behind the russian apartment bombings and was responsible for mass murder of his own people never gets a run-out from the conspiracy loons.
|
|
By:
Falling bodies follow the path of least resistance , that’s what the towers did
|
|
By:
"A falling body cannot follow the path of most resistance."
What utter rubbish. A falling body will fall along the direction of force which a pile of rubble in a tower block is directly down towards the gravitational centre of the earth. |
|
By:
There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the towers were demolished by controlled explosion
|
|
By:
So the secret men in black in the new world order decided that it would great to get the ****ing Simpsons comedy writing team on board to leave clues for true believers about the intent to commit mass murder?
Flippin hell some people need sectioned. |
|
By:
scand is wrong when he says that Silverstein said that explosives were used , he didn’t
Pulled is not a term used in the industry for this in any event |
|
By:
Poker
Science lesson The path of most resistance would be against gravity . BTW there is a massive amount of evidence to suggest that 4 planes crashed on 9-11 Poker - what do you believe DID happen on 9-11? Did 4 planes crash? |
|
By:
The towers collapsed downwards because of gravity and the great force of weight from above downwards
|
|
By:
You have asked me that question several times, Mexico, and I have always given you the same answer. I believe that four aircraft crashed on 911.
Newton's third law states that when objects interact, they always exert equal and opposite forces. Therefore, while an object is falling, if it exerts any force on objects in its path, those objects must push back, slowing the fall. Building 7 collapsed at freefall speed into its own footprint. |
|
By:
mexico; heres what happened
the u.s. perpetrators pulled off a mind-boggling feat of mass slaughter of their own people in the most gruesome way, a act of staggering logistical complexity and expense, in total secrecy for all of the several hundred people involved planning and executing it. the greatest, most brutally cynical false flag operation of all time was accomplished without any of the conspirators breaking rank, cracking under the pressure, accidentally letting it slip, or turning whistle-blower. nor have any enemies of the u.s. like russia or iran or china who, of course, know the truth, bothered to advertise it. on top of that, they managed to frame 20 innocent saudi islmao-loons for the crime. |
|
By:
Mexico wrote:
|
|
By:
When a tall column or building loses its support and buckles , as in wt7
Then it can fall at approx freefall |
|
By:
I believe Wtc7 is an ilrelevant sideshow & not worth getting distracted by hence I don't waste hours watching heavily edited, misleading loon-tube videos
As you can see fro Drink's posts , there are people who don't believe planes crashed. You of course these "truthers " won't answer the most basic question What do you believe SID happen. you're swerving the question by asking a question What do you believe happened to wtc7, it's kinda fundermental. A fire could not have brought it down and a demolition process would have had to of taken weeks in advance to plan, prepare and implement. This building by most sane people's reckoning was deliberately brought down on a wim, on 911, 7 hours after 1&2 came down, enough time to blame 'fire', meaning it's perfectly plausible the twin towers themselves was an attack that many peolple knew was coming but was prevented from being stopped ala the military planes amazing flying the wrong direction out to sea, why they failed to stop it is anyone's guess, I don't believe it was to invade oil rich countries, they already had enough moral justification, maybe they needed something on this scale to justify a change in security law. Though the grand scale and destruction of 911 does make that far fetched, what we do know is Larry Silverstein was absent that day at that time when he was normally present, he was paid out 7 billion dollars in compensation and in the process saved himself 1 billion in costs for removing asbestos from the steel beams. The only thing I agree with is that there were planes and it is laughable to suggest there wasn't. |
|
By:
Just Checking wrote:
|
|
By:
There were about 2 sec of ‘ freefall’
The columns had buckled , still tons of resistance but compared to the mass previously supported practically nothing Hence 99% freefall |
|
By:
Grappler
I'm afraid there are actually some loons on this planet who pretty much believe your post. Very sad. Poker you basically believe the main points of 9-11. I.e. terrorists hijacked 4 planes & crashed them. There are plenty on here disagree with you about 4 crashes-but they won't actually say what they do believe. I believe it effectively made very little difference if the towers Collapsed or not - history would have been similar if "only" 1000 people were murdered on 9-11. |
|
By:
Grappler nails it.
without any of the conspirators breaking rank, Surely due medals. |
|
By:
Scand claims Silverstein said there were explosives , he didn’t
That’s more untruths from the ‘truthers ‘ |
|
By:
SH
WTC7 is NOT kinda fundamental. What is kinda fundamental is 4 planes being hijacked & crashed. It basically made F-All difference if WTC7 collapsed or not. So basically a ilrelevant sideshow. |
|
By:
Not only did the buildings fall through their paths of greatest resistance at freefall speed (WTC 7) and near freefall speed (WTCs 1 and 2) the collapses were improbably symmetrical under any natural circumstances.
I don't presume to know who did it or why they did it, but all three towers were primed to implode. |
|
By:
oi brainbox, why have the enemies of the u.s not done anything to expose the grotesque slaughter of its own people by the u.s govt? if a few hare-brained loons like richard d. hall can dig out all this evidence why cant the gru, or svr? russian efforts to destabilise western countries by trying to influence elections, cyberwarfare, internet lie factories and thousands of spies crawling around the us and europe are all costly and damaging to their image abroad. yet the one knockout punch they could unleash is not used. why would they pass up a golden opportunity to reveal the truth and cause immense damage to the u.s? maybe they were in on it also. the illuminati work in mysterious ways
|
|
By:
SH
Like poker you basically believe almost all of the official story. The bit you differ on is that the authorities knew about the attack & did not stop it. So most of the evidence presented by the state will still support your theory. There are many loons who don't believe planes crashed on 9-11. They won't tell us what they do believe. |
|
By:
Me: "A falling body will fall along the direction of force which [for] a pile of rubble in a tower block is directly down towards the gravitational centre of the earth.".
This is correct. It's not even advanced physics, any intelligent enough person who properly understands high school Newtonian physics, vectors, resultants and sums of force will know this to be true. It's quite basic. Tell me, what would be the sum force on a free falling piece of aggregate concrete or steel towards the centre of the building be, other than directly down, give or take a tiny deviation? PokerDane: "One doesn't need to be a scientist to know that this statement is also woefully incorrect. There is a wealth of empirical evidence of collapsing tower blocks proving otherwise." You are clearly very much not a scientist. |
|
By:
Haven watch Rich D halls Documentary on 9/11,you might change your mind on what actually hit the second twin tower, and Mex the BBC knew WTC 7 had come down 23 minutes before it did and like the other two towers it was blown up by explosives,impossible just planes could do that.No wonder its a sideshow to you as its impossible to defend.
|
|
By:
Do you know if you stand on a can if you can balance it will take your weight
But if you bend down and just tap it on the side with your finger it will immediately colllapse, freefall This is what happened when wt7 started to bend No other method can collapse a can so easily as this |
|
By:
The cam collapses immediately into its own footprint. at freefall !
after you tap it with your finger |
|
By:
Terry
Btw there is a massive amount of evidence to suggest a plane crashed into the second twin tower. & you won't even tell us what you believe that plane looking thing hitting the WTC was. |
|
By:
When the vertical support bows inward by a tiny fraction this can happen
|