Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 794 comments are related to the topic:
9/11 seventeen years on

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 12 of 20  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ... | 20 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 794
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 08:52
Let’s put it this way , if dyno or anyone else say they believe the twin towers were destroyed by an invisible force from outer space that’s ok

They can believe that if they want .
nevertheless I am not going to believe it , without evidence
Sorry that’s how it is
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 03 Oct 18 09:46
I have looked at some of the information that DL suggested and the evidence contained there is pretty compelling. For years i just accepted the hijackers / bin laden story but i now realise how stupid i was. In my defence I was far from alone. The game changer for me was the analysis of the planes, or lack of them , some Incredible research by many who only had one agenda, to seek the truth. Once i got thru that the rest sort of fell into place and i am still learning. As for the evidence regarding the tower collapses I have looked at the footage many times and have never seen anything quite like it. Comparing it to demolition is ok until you see parts of the building seeming to quite literally evaporate. I have no idea about what caused that.
By:
twonky
When: 03 Oct 18 09:49
2 planes hit the towers, there is enough video evidence of that occurring. 2 planes went down in shanksville and the pentagon...no video footage. Shanksville is understandable, middle of nowhere, but there is also no evidence of plane wreckage at either site, which is not so understandable..the official enquiry has more holes in it than the warren commission into Kennedy.
By:
TheBaron
When: 03 Oct 18 09:53
The weapons used had to send out a message to all would be challengers to the dominating entity. ( There is little doubt that the Chinese and the Russians are now FULLY aware of the level of weaponry at the disposal of the USA )

Sometimes the word Bollocks just seems so inadequate.
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:00
more nonsense from the truthers there
There is plenty of evidence of plane wreckage and body parts etc at Shankesville and the pentagon
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:00
And of course Yuu might note
No evidence from Henry or twonky , why not ?
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:08
twonky says he saw the building ‘evaporate ‘
no , the building may have been 90% air , I don’t know
But it didn’t ‘evaporate ‘ you have only to look at the footage and the aftermath
Should have went to spec savers

Now evidence ?  No I thought not
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:10
sorry that was j w Henry , maybe he should look again as well and report back :)
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 03 Oct 18 10:11
Interesting Baron. Anything of any consequence from your end or are you just intent on letting us know what resides between your ears Laugh
LOL @ dave or mexico or whoever he is .. It is you who need to find the evidence to support your plane crash theory. I have yet to see any Crazy
Looking at this thread I can see why others dont bother to respond. i cannot make out if the bbc fan club are for real or just deliberately try to wind others up. I see that many dont bother to get involved as playing russian roulette is probably more fun Laugh
Good Luck to Terry and Dyno etc. I would imagine its more fun pulling teeth than trying to educate this pork
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:13
^ now we get the silly faces from a silly person

But no evidence
By:
terry mccann
When: 03 Oct 18 10:21
You should watch IFC,it would blow your little mindLove
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:26
What would terry ?
By:
terry mccann
When: 03 Oct 18 10:27
All on the documentarys IFC , lots and lots and lots of evidence for you, Rich D. Hall 9/11 you will find fascinating because that's where you see the 2nd Tower wasn't even by a plane! What was it then you may ask(doubt it very much), well watch it and find out,all the filmed evidence needed,brilliant but all for the wrong reasons!
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:31
Not so ,United airlines flt 175 hit the 2nd tower

What do you think happened to flt 175 ?
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:36
Any idea ?
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:37
you might have some evidence terry ?
go ahead , surprise yourself
By:
lfc1971
When: 03 Oct 18 10:40
Here’s a little prediction , terry will not be able to answer that simple question
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 03 Oct 18 11:05
@ ifc / dave / mex / etc. I have looked again and it seems to just vanish in mid air ? explain that please
By:
terry mccann
When: 03 Oct 18 11:22
And some call me mad IFC,look what you post,you are quite bonkersSad
By:
Injera
When: 03 Oct 18 16:01
Mexico - forgive my suspicion surrounding Silverstein.....how can you trust a bloke who conveniently bought the whole complex 6 weeks before 9/11??

As for being a loon - who, those who question the official verdict or Silverstein who owned the 3 Towers and said WT7 was 'pulled'. Is he lying?

I think a loon is someone who sees an aircraft hit the Pentagon when General Albert Stubblebine (Intelligence Expert) says an aircraft DID NOT hit the Pentagon.

A loon is someone who disagrees with Former 9/11 Comissioner Tim Roemer who let slip that a missile hit the Pentagon.

A loon is someone who sees a passenger aircraft in a Shanksville field when really there's just a hole in the ground.

Produce photographic evidence of aircraft crashing in Shanksville and on the untouched Pentagon lawn and I'll change my mind.

As for WT7 being pulled that's from the horse's mouth. Given the other 2 fell in on themselves in identical fashion I suggest Silverstein pulled those too.
By:
terry mccann
When: 03 Oct 18 16:44
My Question to anyone is, who was head of the security company looking after the Twin Towers on that fateful day?
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 03 Oct 18 16:50
I think it was the responsibility of the port authority but not totally sure
By:
Injera
When: 03 Oct 18 17:12
WT7 fell at the speed of gravity. 'Free fall' meaning no obstruction! Let that sink in. Impossible unless it was pulled.
By:
terry mccann
When: 03 Oct 18 17:31
The security company in charge is or was called Securacom and one of its Principals(not head as stated) was one Marvin P. Bush younger brother of George W.
By:
Mexico
When: 03 Oct 18 19:25
So evidence that 4 planes crashed consists of

Eyewitnesses, confessions, black boxes, plane wreckage, phone calls, radar, body parts (DNA) , personal belongings , missing people, missing planes

Yet those who can't understand this massive amount of evidence can't even answer the most simple of questions about their beliefs


What do you believe DID happen? (Keep it brief)
By:
terry mccann
When: 03 Oct 18 19:29
Nobody has to answer to you because its a complete and utter waste of time,hope that was brief enoughLove
By:
Mexico
When: 03 Oct 18 19:37
Terry

It is the most basic question.

Any theory should have on page1 - This is what happened......


The loons have had 17 years of making tin-foil hats yet have not even got the most basic theory.

If the hatters can't provide any alternative theory there is a fatal weakness in their argument.
By:
Injera
When: 03 Oct 18 19:46
Mexico - is Silverstein one of your 'loons'?

He's the fella who bought the towers and said WT7 was pulled.
By:
Mexico
When: 03 Oct 18 20:05
Injera,

There is a massive amount of evidence to suggest planes crashed into WTC & at the 2 other locations.

You have already been caught out giving a misleading narrative about taking out terrorism insurance & not bothering to explain it was just a standard insurance policy.
By:
Get me a drink
When: 03 Oct 18 20:33
What about the suspicious moves in the stock price of airline companies before the attack? Anyone remember that?

I've seen it widely reported on main stream media that the towers were built to withstand aircraft crashing into it.

The only towers that fall into their own footprint are carefully controlled demolitions, yet we are led to believe that 3 towers all fell into their own footprints and at least one of them wasn't even hit by a plane! Yeah right Crazy

But of course, nothing to see here Crazy
By:
Mexico
When: 03 Oct 18 20:54
Of course zero links / evidence to back up your claims drink.

And nothing in your evidence-free theory which suggests that the planes didn't crash into WTC.

Anyway drink - What do you believe DID happen on 9-11 (keep it brief)


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1340225/Twin-towers-built-to-withstand-plane-crash.html
By:
Injera
When: 03 Oct 18 21:27
Mexico - post pictures of aircraft at the Pentagon and in Shanksville.

You won't because THEY DON'T exist!!

I'll ask again, is Silverstein one of your loons? He owned all 3 buildings and admitted on tape WT7 was pulled. Was he lying?

'You have already been caught out giving a misleading narrative about taking out terrorism insurance & not bothering to explain it was just a standard insurance policy. ' - CAUGHT OUT?!!!!!!!

Silverstein insured the damn buildings after buying them 6 weeks before!!! I think the insurance company was caught out!
By:
Torquemada
When: 03 Oct 18 21:41
It is fascinating all this 911 conspiracy stuff. I try not to get too involved in the arguments one way or another but the youtube videos are often very interesting to say the least!
By:
Mexico
When: 03 Oct 18 21:54
Injera

I poster some FBI link a while ago.

As mentioned at the time there is a massive amount of evidence- yet the loons witter on about the lack of evidence rather than looking at the Hugh amount of evidence which exists.

There are eyewitnesses, black boxes,confessions, phone calls, plane wreckage, human remains/ DNA, missing planes, missing people


The buildings were insured more than 6 weeks before- & of course the insurance date has f-all to do with the huge amount of evidence suggesting planes crashed into WTC

Injera- What do you believe DID happen on 9-11 (keep it brief)
By:
terry mccann
When: 03 Oct 18 23:47
Do not answer that question, it has asked me that same question time and again,mex is a dodgy bastard so there is a reason to his sick head
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Oct 18 08:21
I hope injera is not being dishonest again in saying WT7 was pulled

maybe I should give him the benefit of the doubt , again , and say he is muddled and not telling lies , let’s see
By:
Aspro
When: 04 Oct 18 09:48
I hope injera is not being dishonest again in saying WT7 was pulled

I thought it was Larry Silverstein who said it was (his words) "pulled" Confused

Surely everyone has seen that video now
By:
dyno-layer
When: 04 Oct 18 09:52
No apologies for re posting this as new readers of the thread may not have been aware that i posted many of my points of research. I do not get involved with the futile arguments offered by forum gatekeepers.  NO hearsay, NO tit for tat responses etc etc.... Take the time out and see what you think ????

Sadly ,  ifc1971 and / maybe mexico ( im not sure if they are the same poster or what as they both seem to eat s*** and sleep with the BBC news feed on ) however they are crystal clear self proclaiming evidence of how the powers that be have been able to suppress the details of the true findings of the tragedy for so long.

The level of consciousness which is currently held by so many oh so sadly comes prefixed with the letters (UN).

It is not for me to outline what happened and why it happened and why it continues to split opinion between those who are awake and those that are woefully UNCONSCIOUS however i have  stated my main resources *

I didnt know what to believe when i first decided to try and delve into pandoras box and i proceeded to watch as many videos and read as many  factual accounts as i possibly could until one day I stumbled across a youtube TV station /  website called RICHPLANET.

There was so much to watch on there that I didnt even go first to his 911 pages as that looked one of the older productions, however, I eventually found my way there and i have to say it literally changed the way i view almost everything which is thrown at us all daily from Mainstream media.

Here was a guy who seems to have self funded his way to trying to help others see the light by carrying out research and investigations into events which all have a huge question mark hanging over them.

I found it fascinating, in addition I found it somewhat bewildering that virtually everyone i mentioned it to had never heard of it !!!

I would recommend anyone who wants to get a proper grasp of many of the top news stories of our time take a look at this site,

Anyway back to 911. The analysis carried out by RDH ( Richard Hall ) and his guests was incredible. Every preconceived idea i had held previously was challenged and shown to be false.

the scientific evidence from the vanishing towers was scrutinised analysed and assessed. It was incredible.

I took it upon myself to then venture to the websites many of the analysts he had featured and the picture just seemed to unfold.

I then decided that although James Corbett had not been involved in the programme as he prefers to sit on the fence regarding the disappearing towers and frankly that it not a bad move for someone who has already exposed many of the 911 criminals in his excellent production, FOLLOW THE MONEY, however, like so many others he refrains from championing the work of Dr J wood as that seems to be the game changer and if you want an idea of what this could mean for mankind then read AJs books which are available FOC for kindle download. 

So when you are able to sit down and digest much of what i have eluded to you can get a grip of why and how and then begin to ponder what next !!!!

Again I will state that my beliefs are what are stated in A johnsons excellent books FINDING THE TRUTH and HOLDING THE TRUTH. By watching the numerous other productions I managed to grasp it.

I try not to get involved in debate regarding 911 as i have formulated my opinion through many months of research and although it was never easy to push the s*** to one side, i honestly believe the list of productions i have offered up for perusal paint a fair and just appraisal of what happened.

All to many wont bother to read or to watch but it is all there and if you can come out of the other side with a better understanding of the ifs ands buts and maybes then my time hasnt been totally wasted. I believe that I know what happened through consideration of the links ( and many others ) so dont waste any more your time commenting unless you have read and watched, It could just change your life !!!

Not so clueless really as i dont spout nonsense. I back up my beliefs with listed scientific analysis and scrupulous study of all aspects of the horror show,

Please only offer further comment if you ever get the time in between posting on here to consider the following information.

*

Here is the link for a recent documentary/ Investigation carried out by a young guy called Chris Hampton. In respect of copyright infringement his original presentation was taken down by Youtube but as i type the updated version is still available.

911 ALCHEMY = FACING REALITY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zz04_-f0GE


This is also available to view on his own website WOLF CLAN MEDIA

This presentation predominantly deals with the four reported plane crashes in relation to the 911 attack and is approximately 3 hours in duration. It is compulsive viewing.

I would also recommend you consider viewing the following.

IRREFUTABLE  - 911

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyWhdSe0Yc


Evidence based documentary regarding the WTC towers.

In addition .

CHECKtheEVIDENCE.COM is a comprehensive research hub which has many points of interest.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/


RICHPLANET.TV has various interviews contained on his platform which are enlightening

https://www.richplanet.net/


9/11 TRILLIONS : FOLLOW THE MONEY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA


Interesting analysis from James Corbett who covers the events leading up the attack.

Corbett has also produced documentaries covering potential suspects for the crime which are well worth looking up.

There are 3 books which are well worth reading,

FINDING THE TRUTH and HOLDING THE TRUTH both written by Andrew Johnson and available as FOC PDF downloads from his website Checktheevidence.com

Last but not least probably the most informative book ever written about the subject

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO ? written by Dr Judy Wood.


Regarding the planes .. http://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/

The following 2 links are included because they highlight the lengths that are gone to in order to keep the suppression of information firmly under control. Sadly there are many others

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrTjPGy2k_U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o95Pr1pSNI

There is a fabulous array of information documented above  Take a day off, keep an open mind and consider the evidence.

Frankly I am not sure if there is anything the common man can do in order to stand up against this type of perpetrator but being armed with the knowledge presented may help. There are some pretty determined truth seeking baton carriers listed above who have pure and simply put their lives on the line over this and is some cases ruined their careers in the name of the justice.
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Oct 18 10:19
deary me so many words and to say nothing just about nothing

you’re becoming extremely boring now dyno , if you have any facts or evidence come back and let us know , thanks
By:
dyno-layer
When: 04 Oct 18 14:51
@ ifc Comical if only in your own small world.

It wasn't done for you it was done for others who perhaps dont spend in excess of 27k posts in untold bile constantly spouting absolutely zilch of any value to any1 !!!

If you ever have the time to squeeze in some solid research and realise what a hopeless waste of everyones time you have actually been then maybe i will entertain any of your further postings but until then adios amigo !
Page 12 of 20  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ... | 20 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com