Trump-Kim Summit > Betfair Community

Betfair Community

Home › Chit Chat Forum › Trump-Kim Summit

Switch to Community Classic App Directory

Chit Chat

‹ back to topics

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

These 244 comments are related to the topic:
Trump-Kim Summit

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

Page 4 of 7 • Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Replies: 244

By:

moisok When: 12 Jun 18 11:57

Watched this all morning. At last the US has met with the n. koreans - in the press conference all the media people were harping on the negative side. the media who only have negativity - For them war is great as it makes news and peace bad as no bad things to report and disturb the global citizens. All these media people must beware that for what they do, after death they all will not find any human or godly abodes. These media people can never see never see the good. Nuclear brinkmanship over a chance of peace. Go ask the s. koreans what they think. A few months ago they were making out the east would be in flames.

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 12:03

Jeremy Vine now , wait till we hear that miserable muppet

By:

terry mccann When: 12 Jun 18 12:04

what a load of tom t1t, the media are told what to print and what not to print and question nothing, ie its all Rushers fault even though there is not one jot of to prove it

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 12:05

ok Springsteen on first that’s good , very good
That’s America , be thankful

By:

moisok When: 12 Jun 18 12:06

someone pointed out it took 20 years to get where they are in n. ireland now

By:

moisok When: 12 Jun 18 12:12

they are stirring like fk on the bbc but could not silence the south korean president from saying this is a historic agreement.

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 12:26

for once stop whining abt the media. Enjoy the show

By:

terry mccann When: 12 Jun 18 12:28

time will tell what its all about, best of friends all of a sudden--bless em

By:

moisok When: 12 Jun 18 12:37

traveller stop whining for once

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 12:39

im not whining you mug. im all praise for trump here. Though i know i've brainwashed you enough to start whining irrespective of what i say, just like the politicians

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 12:41

Trump's saved a lot of european sheeps from fighting another war. At least for now.

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 12:42

its sheep of course, not sheeps.

By:

moisok When: 12 Jun 18 13:17

you must be choking on this terrible news traveller

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 13:23

Any reason why?

By:

Torquemada When: 12 Jun 18 14:00

BBC in mourning today, they're absolutely distraught at Trump's success.

Ask yourself this question: what would the reporting be like if it was Obama and not Trump? If you are honest in your answer you will realise just how corrupt most of the lefty media has become.

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 14:14

If it was Obama, the reporting will still be biased. Media has been reporting whatever they want to since ages. People have never been able to figure out.

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 14:14

Think of it like this. If you had control over a medium of information, and could see the potential of using it to your advantage to gain political and financial benefits, why would you not?

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 14:22

another senseless point from detraveller

By:

detraveller When: 12 Jun 18 14:23

THanks

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 14:24

You’re welcome

By:

SontaranStratagem When: 12 Jun 18 14:49

Jun 12, 2018 -- 2:14PM, detraveller wrote:

If it was Obama, the reporting will still be biased. Media has been reporting whatever they want to since ages. People have never been able to figure out.

The media are split into two sides, the anti trump and the pro trump, it was the same with Obama as well, fox news/infowars etc were anti Obama and CNN/MSNBC were pro Obama. Nothing has changes its just the man in the white house is on the opposite side to the previous.

And this will continue until people wake up and smell the coffee. Why would you change something when people will eat up whatever their preferred choice of media propaganda happens to be.

I find all media quite rancid, but I have a deeper hatred for the alt right, because they pretend to be about free speech and rule of law, yet are quick to shut down anyone with the opposite view, and were telling people to protest because of Tommy Robinsons arrest, despite him pleading guilty.

They've gone very quiet on the Tommy Robinson front though like he doesn't exist. have they lost the movement? and wont touch it until they get another puppet leader in place?

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 14:51

I think you’re missing the point , it is the people that are the problem

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 14:54

Now it’s no good saying the media are split into different points of view
It people are as well now is it ?
There there are people like yourself

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:02

Oh I get it , you don’t like all of the media

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:07

If only it were all so simple, we would have no need for Solzhenitsyn

By:

aaronh When: 12 Jun 18 15:07

Jun 12, 2018 -- 2:49PM, SontaranStratagem wrote:

Jun 12, 2018 -- 2:14PM, detraveller wrote:If it was Obama, the reporting will still be biased. Media has been reporting whatever they want to since ages. People have never been able to figure out.The media are split into two sides, the anti trump and the pro trump, it was the same with Obama as well, fox news/infowars etc were anti Obama and CNN/MSNBC were pro Obama. Nothing has changes its just the man in the white house is on the opposite side to the previous. And this will continue until people wake up and smell the coffee. Why would you change something when people will eat up whatever their preferred choice of media propaganda happens to be. I find all media quite rancid, but I have a deeper hatred for the alt right, because they pretend to be about free speech and rule of law, yet are quick to shut down anyone with the opposite view, and were telling people to protest because of Tommy Robinsons arrest, despite him pleading guilty. They've gone very quiet on the Tommy Robinson front though like he doesn't exist. have they lost the movement? and wont touch it until they get another puppet leader in place?

The right are crying now that they see their fave being skewered in the media after years of left figures getting the same treatment. The rise of alternative media is fascinating because these don't even pretend not to have an agenda yet get considered less biased on both sides

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:10

^ never happened

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:12

If you like do you want to try some examples , let’s start with Thatcher

By:

aaronh When: 12 Jun 18 15:13

Do you believe the papers were positive about Corbyn?

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:15

Newspapers are allowed to take a stance, that is the beauty of newspapers you can buy any number of them
Now I suggest you forget about that
What about the state media , take a look there

By:

SontaranStratagem When: 12 Jun 18 15:15

MSNBC/CNN are pro democrat and anti Trump, that's their part in the game

Infowars/Drudge/Fox are all pro Trump, that's their part in the game

= divide and conquer

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:16

Any problem with leftists or liberals on the BBC for example ?

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:18

ITV , channel 4....?

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:18

Radio , 12,3,4 ....?

By:

SontaranStratagem When: 12 Jun 18 15:21

BBC is anti Trump as well? as is C4. dont know about ITV as I don't pay any attention to em

But its an information war, and all the teams in the game spin their own web

Alt media is the worst for it, because they pretend to be the lords of truth, yet take the **** out of anyone who dares to question their spin, even going as far as to post up pics of "big women" and mock them for being liberals. all sides are bad though.

By:

SontaranStratagem When: 12 Jun 18 15:23

Where do you get you news from lfc?

RT? Infowars? BBC? other internet sources?

By:

aaronh When: 12 Jun 18 15:26

Jun 12, 2018 -- 3:15PM, lfc1971 wrote:

Newspapers are allowed to take a stance, that is the beauty of newspapers you can buy any number of themNow I suggest you forget about that What about the state media , take a look there

Surely trump should respect that then when he goes on about WaPo and NYT for example.

Do the government control BBC editorial policy? Otherwise it isn't really state media even if funded so. If your focus is "state media" only then CNN is allowed to be as biased as The Sun or Daily Mail is thrb

Made my views clear on BBC in the other thread. I really don't see a slant in either direction on political issues. Social issues yes.

The amount of people you see complaining on both sides about the BBC or their guests suggest there is enough of both sides.

By:

aaronh When: 12 Jun 18 15:27

Is then*

By:

lfc1971 When: 12 Jun 18 15:27

Bits and pieces here and there , if something interests me I listen
sometimes I have stopped listening, if the word Muslim is mentioned I immediately stop listening for example
I don’t need to hear anything more, I have already heard too much

By:

timbuctooth When: 12 Jun 18 15:34

SS; just because you trawl web sites, doesn`t mean most people do; therefore, having to include web sites in an attempt at seeming to be evening up the numbers, is Fake News. The truth is that Fox is on it`s own, up against CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC and CBS; that`s five against one! Throw in every UK station, every UK newspaper, plus the vast majority of the US press, and it`s no wonder we still have so many willfully ignorant lefties posting on here.