Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 314 comments are related to the topic:
Do you believe in free speach?
Do you believe in free speach?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 314
|
By:
I take it you can't answer the question then PP?
|
|
By:
Jesus, another one who doesn't like the answer so demands another one.
It's still allowed to call people stupid isn't it. Good. God, you're thick doc. |
|
By:
And there's the insult to confirm PP has lost the argument.
Game set and match. |
|
By:
'reported' 'hate crime' would be a starter
anything anti islamic the TELFORD effect or wot weeze call ROCHDALEPHOBIA black lives matter - the opposite applies to the honkey variety - don't dare mention it ho ho the two way racism - it doesn't work one way though |
|
By:
ME TOO ME TOO
wimmins' rights anything brexit gets howled down - the televisual experience shows that 80/20 percent bias over the eu on bbc so 20 percent free speech to the pro brexiteers ho ho |
|
By:
At least 3 of us, very, very clearly and succinctly explaining what free speech is and why we don't have it, why we've never had it previously.....
None of saying it is good or bad, or whether we agree with it, just stating the fact.... but.... No let up, no sign of understanding from crippen or lfc. Partly because they don't understand, partly because they don't want to, partly because of the "sea-lioning" thing (very good that btw, I hadn't heard of it). But mostly because they NEVER EVER concede anything on any subject. Crippen, you're quite objectionable and wrong so often on so many topics, you should simply say the opposite of whatever you assume. lfc, you should drop the L |
|
By:
oh for the old days when minorities knew their place and if any of them ever got lippy they'd get a swift back hander. Progress? Shmogress.
|
|
By:
back in the 50s there weren't many of them and didn't threaten to take over the streets
hope this helps as a supporter of freedom I laud the feminazis, and islamists pushing their agenda and black lives matter etc etc more and more and more YAWN!!! |
|
By:
So it's their fault for existing!!!!
There'd be no bigotry if only the world was made up of white men! |
|
By:
It's noticeable how most of the posts from STUDYFORM are little more than attacks on other posters.
|
|
By:
sea lioning (also spelled sealioning and sea-lioning) is a type of Internet trolling which consists of bad-faith requests for evidence, or repeated questions, the purpose of which is not clarification or elucidation, but rather an attempt to derail a discussion or to wear down the patience of one's opponent. The troll who uses this tactic also uses fake civility and feigns offense so as to discredit their target.[1][2][3][4] The term arises from a 2014 edition of the webcomic Wondermark, where a character expresses an unsubstantiated dislike of sea lions and a passing sea lion repeatedly asks the character to explain
|
|
By:
I see the issue of the holocaust was brought up earlier.
Denying the holocaust is not as far as I know illegal in the UK. Although I'm sure that powers behind the scenes would prevent any investigation being brought that would bring any part of the story into doubt. With regard to holocaust deniers, many are labelled such for merely questioning the numbers quoted. Which more or less puts an end to any debate on the holocaust. |
|
By:
With the above in mind, we can see that making it illegal in the UK to deny the holocaust isn't necessary.
|
|
By:
oh I don't know -
but then 'they don't like it up 'em' as us bigots say. I wonder what will happen to the forumites who side with these naughty people in masks and cloaks and don't like any criticism of their cult? Do you think they will be 'invited' to join them? |
|
By:
The "powers behind the scenes".
"questioning the numbers" - well let's edge towards doing that, shall we? WAFC |
|
By:
it is strange how there has been a huge growth in one group residing in the UK and the growth of antisemitism at the same time
it even tells them to practice that in their good book not that I know anything |
|
By:
it is strange how there has been a huge growth in one group residing in the UK and the growth of antisemitism at the same time
Which is very noticeable moisok. |
|
By:
He just can't help himself can he that STUDYFORM?
|
|
By:
^there he goes again - lol.
|
|
By:
crippen is the devil's spawn for destroying the forum
you have been a very naughty boy  |
|
By:
I am the leading cult on here - so I am told
be very careful or your computer may fall on you from a great height - metaphorically - with all the criticism you will suffer after challenging the biggest cult on here!! always first with the latest news from MO TOWERS |
|
By:
Looks like STUDY has got a long day in front of him again.
|
|
By:
disgraceful language from studyform
well never mind that, has anyone answered the question yet? |
|
By:
I wonder what he means?
|
|
By:
^^To STUDY that was.
|
|
By:
Apologies for being so ignorant but what's the definition of free speech?
|
|
By:
pipe down detraveller, theres no point explaining anything to you
|
|
By:
I feel it would be appropriate to put the question again for those who might have come in late.
This is what lfc1971 is referring to: Here is a question,if we didn't have free speech in Britain , in the past and in our lifetimes, what was it not permissible to say in Britain in the past? |
|
By:
now detraveller, perhaps you might have a go at answering, study has failed miserably and resorted to bad language
|
|
By:
Lfc, I already told you I couldn't think of anything other than the holocaust, which you clearly said i was wrong in(and i didn't contest that). It was stupid of me to get into the debate without knowing what free speech means. So I asked.
I hope it makes you feel great that you won the argument with me. But if you are not willing to define a term you used in your question, how can you expect someone to take you seriously? As for someone resorting to bad language, I would understand that. I know not to get involved in a discussion with you but sadly I did. And am probably paying for it. |
|
By:
no answer from detraveller, cant say it surprises me
|
|
By:
Lfc, I already told you I couldn't think of anything other than the holocaust, which you clearly said i was wrong in(and i didn't contest that).
I thought this qualified for an answer? M english isn't perfect but I think it should qualify as the answer? |
|
By:
nope
|
|
By:
read again what is being asked detraveller, read it carefully
if you cant understand words there is no point in reading words |
|
By:
So how do I answer the question if I agree with you that there indeed was free speech in the past and there was nothing that you couldn't say?
|
|
By:
if you cant understand words there is no point in reading words
I asked you to define a word but you refused. |
|
By:
I am not asking you to agree with me
read the question again |
|
By:
I regret getting into this argument. Do I get a pass if I apologize for my intervention here?
|
|
By:
sorry detraveller :) I just don't want to start going over everything again
it was a straightforward enough question so far no one has answered it |
|
By:
I think it might be one of those 'unanswerable questions'. Very clever of you lfc.
|