Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
The Leopard
29 Jul 17 16:10
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Apr 06
| Topic/replies: 48,023 | Blogger: The Leopard's blog
They've gone too far !

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 128
By:
tictacman1
When: 29 Jul 17 16:15
Kim Jong-un "said proudly the test also confirmed all the US mainland is within our striking range," the Korean Central News Agency said.

Tin hats at the ready.....
By:
The Leopard
When: 29 Jul 17 16:39
.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/29/china-and-russia-have-responsibility-for-north-korea-nuclear-threat-says-us

The United States has accused China and Russia of bearing “unique and special responsibility” for North Korea’s “belligerent” pursuit of nuclear weapons, after Pyongyang tested its latest ballistic missile.

North Korea conducted its second intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) test late on Friday in what it called a warning to the “beast-like US imperialists”. It came less than a month after its first such experiment, on 4 July.

Analysis North Korea: are missiles capable of hitting New York City?
Experts believe Pyongyang’s missiles are capable of striking LA, Chicago or even New York – but Trump’s scattergun approach to diplomacy does not bode well

The test-launch sent “a grave warning to the US” that it “would not go scot-free if it dares provoke” the North, Pyongyang’s official news agency, KCNA, said in a statement.

“If the Yankees brandish the nuclear stick on this land again despite our repeated warnings, we will clearly teach them manners,” KCNA warned.

The news agency described Pyongyang’s weapons programs as a “precious strategic asset that cannot be bartered for anything” and an indication of the country’s “tremendous might”.

The US secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, hit back on Saturday, describing North Korea’s launch as a “blatant violation” of multiple UN security council resolutions.

Tillerson also pointed the finger of blame at Beijing and Moscow.

“As the principal economic enablers of North Korea’s nuclear weapon and ballistic missile development program, China and Russia bear unique and special responsibility for this growing threat to regional and global stability,” he said in a statement.

Tillerson’s comments are sure to anger Russia and China. Earlier this month Beijing rejected claims from US president Donald Trump that it had a responsibility to do more to rein in its ally. “I think this either shows lack of a full, correct knowledge of the issue, or there are ulterior motives for it, trying to shift responsibility,” Geng Shuang, a foreign ministry spokesman, told reporters.

On Saturday, China’s foreign ministry made no reference to Tillerson’s comments but called on Pyongyang “to respect United Nations security council resolutions and stop all acts that could worsen tensions on the Korean peninsula”.

China also “urged all the relevant parties to act with caution” to prevent the situation from escalating, the ministry added, parroting previous language on the issue.


'You would have to be a lunatic': Tourists to North Korea describe risks and rewards

Bonnie Glaser, the director of the China power project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) thinktank in Washington, said Kim Jong-un’s latest test – of a missile some experts said had the capacity to reach New York – would increase Chinese fears of a US strike against the North.

“I suspect that the Chinese are going to be worried about the possibility of a US military strike on North Korea going forward … The Chinese can’t rule out the Trump ‘unpredictability’ factor,” she said.

Last week the US’s top military officer told a security forum in Aspen, Colorado that conflict with North Korea was not “unimaginable”.

“What’s unimaginable to me is allowing a capability that would allow a nuclear weapon to land in Denver, Colorado – that’s unimaginable to me. And so my job will be to develop military options to make sure that doesn’t happen,” said Gen Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff.

Glaser said it was hard to predict whether Trump’s White House was genuinely pondering such military options, which might include attempting to destroy a North Korean missile on the launch pad before it it was fired. But following Friday’s test, calls for a return to negotiations appeared increasingly unrealistic. “Diplomacy seems very unlikely at present.”

Jeffrey Lewis, a North Korea specialist at the Middlebury institute of international studies, said he believed a military strike against North Korea had become unthinkable in the light of the ICBM tests, which showed Pyongyang could hit targets on US soil by launching missiles from unexpected locations and at unexpected times.

“The North Koreans wanted to demonstrate that ... if there was a war they could definitely launch [missiles] in the dead of night from some place we don’t expect so we wouldn’t have a chance to fire at them before they got off the ground.”

“What I think this changes is that it forces the US to confront something that we have said for a long-time is unacceptable … [that] they can target New York and LA and there is not much we can do about it.”

“The window for [military action] has closed. People are jumping up and down and screaming [in Washington] not because they are getting ready to attack but because they don’t really have that option any more and they accept that it has gone,” Lewis added.

“Attacking a nuclear-armed state is usually a bad idea - which is why countries build nuclear weapons. That is kind of the appeal.”
By:
Just Checking
When: 29 Jul 17 16:48
It's a tricky one, it's unstable state run by madmen and the longer you leave it the more capable they'll get with better and more weapons.

Problem is also that AFAIK they have a huge amount of conventional weapons pointed at south korea so if it kicked off they'd get it the old fashioned way.

They could just nuke the place flat? I'm kind of sick of the total love the UK media has for trump, it's time he did something stupid so the BBC could say something bad about him for once.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 29 Jul 17 16:52
I thought USA had defence missile system ?
By:
Just Checking
When: 29 Jul 17 16:57
Do they trust them to work? TBH if NK did nuke los angeles or something, I seriously think the US would just obliterate them off the map, especially under trump, as an example. Corbyn would want them to give the NK hugs and anger management away weekends and talk about how the feel.
By:
treetop
When: 29 Jul 17 17:18
We should just talk to them and it will all be sorted out over a cup of tea.
By:
saddo
When: 29 Jul 17 17:46
Leopard loves a fuss about nowt.
By:
The Leopard
When: 29 Jul 17 18:22
You have reassured me....I have cancelled my bunker order.
By:
casemoney
When: 29 Jul 17 18:38
MOAB JONGS PALACE JOB DONE
By:
saddo
When: 29 Jul 17 19:37
Leopard Laugh
By:
DStyle
When: 29 Jul 17 19:39
it doesn't seem that complicated to me.

If N. Korea attacked another nation, unprovoked, be it the USA, Japan, South Korea, Lichtenstein, whatever, that would be it for them. They would be crushed. And for this reason, they remain extremely unlikely to do so.

However, if the Americans took pre-emptive action to what is little more than sabre rattling, and sabre rattling which is almost certainly exclusively for domestic consumption, things could get extremely messy.
By:
Breedingmad
When: 29 Jul 17 20:07
If there ever is a War no doubt it would start in the Daily Mail and spread from there.
By:
Clouseau
When: 29 Jul 17 20:19
Build a massive wall around North Korea and stick a roof on top. Job done... Oh and make the North Koreans pay for it.
By:
The Leopard
When: 29 Jul 17 20:45
Sounds like a bunker?
By:
detraveller
When: 29 Jul 17 22:44
Will be really interesting if the US strikes. Seoul will be the first one to pay. I couldn't give less fecks about it since Kim won't ever be able to nuke Europe but we'll probably have to supply some troops like we alwyas do.
By:
brassneck
When: 29 Jul 17 23:13
population of north korea=24 million(its a joke)
By:
detraveller
When: 29 Jul 17 23:53

Jul 29, 2017 -- 5:13PM, brassneck wrote:


population of north korea=24 million(its a joke)


What is that supposed to mean? Countries usually have an army and its the size/strength of the army that determines the strength of the nation not the population. By your logic India and China should have crushed the world by now?

By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 30 Jul 17 00:16
Nothing will happen, American learned there lesson in Vietnam. Don't pluck with the South East Asians.

There's also no oil there.

But North Korea's retaliation would be devastating for the region with their hidden nuclear missles, they could wipe out Tokyo and Seoul in a heartbeat. China would also not want millions of refugees pouring over it's border, would cause a monumental humanitarian crises.

Only way it could happen is simply if kim was actually stupid enough to launch an attack of any kind, it wont happen, these tests are just a show of strength  to the North Korean people, to reinforce his power, not that he needs to, the people there are too scared to even blink.
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 30 Jul 17 00:16
America*
their*
By:
bigH
When: 30 Jul 17 00:37
Got to feel sorry for the NK people

they have been subjected to systematic brainwashing for decades by power crazed nutjobs

You can't just nuke millions of innocent people

Need to cut off the head of the monster

The people will then rise up against they system and smash it
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Jul 17 00:40
I would like to see America invade N. Korea.
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Jul 17 00:46
With Trump as president . If would make him the greatest president since Roosevelt.
By:
lfc1971
When: 30 Jul 17 00:58
The country should be taken over , inch by inch, mile by mile.
By:
The Leopard
When: 30 Jul 17 00:59
At last...the voice of reason !
By:
Capt__F
When: 30 Jul 17 01:01
stik the tories in first Boris looks a bit like kim
By:
Just Checking
When: 30 Jul 17 03:07
The US anti missile systems are designed to hit them mid flight or on reentry, as with say russians etc you couldn't get them at launch as it's a huge country and they had subs. But until NK gets subs, it's a small country to launch from? If I were in the US I'd be looking at a defence system that gets them at launch, when they are slow and vulnerable, and line these defences up on the border / in ships offshore. Far easier to hit a rocket with a huge very trackable flare on the bottom going 200mph at 5000ft trying to accelerate than one doing 3000mph coming down from 300 miles up..!
By:
terry mccann
When: 30 Jul 17 07:55
that was the American plan along with all the others they've invaded,the north got wise to it and took some steps and now they cant invade-simples
By:
detraveller
When: 30 Jul 17 11:36
Pakistan, Iran and North Korea did a great job in getting nuclear tech. Pakistan does an even better job as it allies itself with the West and profits both ways. All 3 of these countries would have been bombed to dust long time ago, as American has bombed countries for lesser crimes than these 3 have committed.

One good thing about Europe going down is that people will realize exactly the type of people we were liberating with America. They now experience first hand who these people are. Im sure people won't buy the 'we have a moral duty to liberate them' or 'we need to help the oppressed' crap before we invade someone. Same with North Korea. How their people have been oppressed should be none of our concern. It doesn't justify invading or bombing them.
By:
cooperman
When: 30 Jul 17 12:07
A country run by a madman, constantly flaunting it's military, threatening other countries and treating it's population like idiots. North Korea almost as bad. Grin
By:
saddo
When: 30 Jul 17 14:55
How imminent is imminent please?
By:
cooperman
When: 30 Jul 17 15:44
in a while
By:
terry mccann
When: 30 Jul 17 15:54
the yanks have just opened a new base in south korea which holds 45,000 soldiers,a small town eve really,schools,church"s fast food outlets,even a golf course, not sure why as they can hardly invade the north now
By:
brassneck
When: 30 Jul 17 16:09
message for detraveller,im sure you heard of the song called Enola Gay,its only a little problem.
By:
lybertyne
When: 30 Jul 17 17:36
A North Korean missile that looked dangerous would be shot down.

North Korea still has regular launch failures; would they risk accidentally nuking their own country?

They must understand that if they did attack they'd undoubtedly be destroyed in the retaliation.  Their leadership isn't suicidal like muslims.

Everything North Korea does is to make Kim Jong-un look strong to his own people.  They'll keep attacking the sea but they'd never initiate an actual conflict.
By:
casemoney
When: 30 Jul 17 17:44
Best place to Hit would be the Launch Pad hopefully a Direct Strike on the War Head
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 30 Jul 17 23:23
looks like a go for attacking north korea.

china , you had your chance to resolve this peacefully?

it's all fake. the chinese and the americans and the koreans all have the same boss.
he owns the bankers and the secretive groups across the globe.
sets up fake conflicts to keep control of the whole world.

the Venezuela experiment of beating down people who gain self control is
an example of what they want for us all.

it's leading to everyone being personally attacked in some way as the year progresses.
financially, spiritually, through health or upturning of norms.

October is the summit.
By:
The Leopard
When: 30 Jul 17 23:41
Hmmmm.....nice .......my birthday is in October ! Mischief
By:
The Leopard
When: 30 Jul 17 23:43
(Hi to Crags ! btw....post something on the orange you tube thread Wink)
By:
ufcdan
When: 31 Jul 17 08:08
The main problem that seems to of been missed by all on here is the nuclear fallout ! Detraveller wrote that he's not to bothered as the NK can't hit Europe ! Not long after Chernobyl reactor blew up I was aboard a US nuclear submarine off the west coast of America about to go into Bremerton, Washington state. As the boat always ran on a war footing we nearly didn't surface due to the radiation readings. If it does kick off the radiation in the area will wipe out the likes of Japan, South Korea and large swaths of China which I imagine might irritate them a bit Mischief imagine not only the human cost but the effect on the world economy!
Page 1 of 4  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com