|
By:
Oh, and we can add Pandora to the list. I forgot about him.
|
|
By:
You would seem to think that anyone not extreme right wing is a loony left poster
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Everyone else on here is extreme right wing are they?
|
|
By:
Just following your lead.
|
|
By:
Torquemada is a sandwich short of a picnic, best ignored.
|
|
By:
Take Tobermory for example, the person who started the latest thread. I don't think he holds extreme right wing views nor loony left luvvie nonsense. He seems quite measured to me. So your accusation is clearly rubbish, Fife.
|
|
By:
If only you had the willpower to ignore me SH. But you just can't do it mate, it would eat you up to block me, you just couldn't handle it.
![]() Facts tried it and failed miserably. ![]() |
|
By:
shouldn't you be in bed, resting for the hard week's scaffolding ahead?
|
|
By:
Farage and Trump
![]() http://www.captiongenerator.com/320062/FARAGE-AND-TRUMP-#.WIKxJkJFqsE.email |
|
By:
You are not wrong Torq.
|
|
By:
I suspect very few on here hold far right views. It seems to be a typical accusation from the loony left towards anyone who stands up against their delusional nonsense. The truth is those who get labelled as far right tend to be just right of centre. Loony lefties call their extreme left politicians "moderates!"
![]() |
|
By:
What is meant by holding far right views?
|
|
By:
Not pretending that unlimited immigration is good for the nation, apparently.
|
|
By:
Who knows anymore Dr Crippen? The loonies accuse so many ordinary people of being far right it has become difficult to know what it means.
|
|
By:
Stupid lib dem on the election coverage on thursday said the TORIES were "far right".
That's how bad it's got with these idiots. |
|
By:
The BNP are supposed to far right, but if you look at their list of policies they're the same as Labour apart from immigration.
Same with the by-election at Stoke. A very high proportion voting to leave the EU and obviously fed up with immigration, yet Labour easily wins the by-election. Are these Stoke voters far right? |
|
By:
Corbyn..fck him..the scruffy cnt
..that clip is hilarious kenny |
|
By:
Good list that torquemada..reckon you've got all of the idiots there
|
|
By:
Stoke probably has a good mix of all sorts of political views, very few of them extreme I should imagine. The difference with right wingers is that they will accept the loss to Labour as fair democracy in action, and not take to the streets to whinge about the unfairness of it all, stamping their feet in a hissy fit.
|
|
By:
Torquemada is a scaffolder?
Should visit hong kong : Bamboo scaffolding right up the side of huge skyscrapers :) Fancy working on this? http://i.imgur.com/GTDJoA6.jpg |
|
By:
Stoke would have won that by-election if Nuttall had not been involved..the scouser is pure toxic..its no wonder Banks is threatening to cut UKIP adrift
|
|
By:
^^It's easy to see how he lost his teeth.
|
|
By:
Torquemada, you (and a few others) have transformed this forum from being the fun - chit-chat - place it was into the awful excuse of a forum with about 10% of its former traffic by using it to perpetuate the non-stop pseudo-fascist, daily mail love-in, rubbish.
There are no words available to ever stop the nonsense that you never cease putting on here. The Trump/Brexit/Immigrant/anti leftie (anyone who doesn't agree with every word)/Farage/BBC drivel never stops. It's boring and in the main wrong, but populist in a 'let's all be mates on a forum' and agree with what we can glean from each other here. You don't seem to allow accurate information get in the way either! The flies round the poop that is this thread have appeared in support of the vitriol. The list of your friends on here is longer than the list of the enemies you'd like to have on here. (I suspect it's the reverse at work). There are FAR more posts started by you and your "buddies" than by the list you started this thread with. Why not just use the politics forum? You can all rub each other up the right way on there and not be interrupted by anyone much, or maybe it flies in the face of the "spreading the word on as many forums as possible" which was a tenet of the existence of the BNP. The majority of foot stamping is definitely yours, btw. |
|
By:
This is an example of an right wing extremist hth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Tom%C3%A1s_de_Torquemada |
|
By:
^The video.
|
|
By:
I know bamboo is very strong, I wouldn't want to test it though thanks very much!
|
|
By:
Dave 1357...four runner race £10 ew on a 5/1 winner..what yer make the return?
|
|
By:
The usual delusional nonsense from Studyform. Who is on this long list of far righters then? Let's have it.
|
|
By:
On this thread alone we have the ever present loony lefties
Fife Scandinavian Haven Dave1357 Studyform And it's barely a page deep. Your lot are forever telling others to ignore or block me, but are absolutely incapable if following your own advice. You have to read my threads, it would eat you up not to know. ![]() |
|
By:
Come on now Dave..its not that difficult
![]() |
|
By:
The forum's not as good as it was blah blah blah
People like you are ruining it blah blah blah I'm leaving forever blah blah blah You've been spouting that nonsense ad nauseum for years Studyform. The truth is that the forum would be a much better place without your constant whinging and whining. |
|
By:
And in the Blue corner,
Torquemada Crippen JC twizzle Saddo Go on then So I make that about the same as usual. See? you can't count. |
|
By:
I never mentioned far-righters, I just mentioned immovable objects on forums.
|
|
By:
STUDYFORM 26 Feb 17 19:47 Joined: 26 Jan 05 | Topic/replies: 15,985 | Blogger: STUDYFORM's blog Torquemada, you (and a few others) have transformed this forum from being the fun - chit-chat - place it was into the awful excuse of a forum with about 10% of its former traffic by using it to perpetuate the non-stop pseudo-fascist, daily mail love-in, rubbish. There are no words available to ever stop the nonsense that you never cease putting on here. The Trump/Brexit/Immigrant/anti leftie (anyone who doesn't agree with every word)/Farage/BBC drivel never stops. It's boring and in the main wrong, but populist in a 'let's all be mates on a forum' and agree with what we can glean from each other here. You don't seem to allow accurate information get in the way either! The flies round the poop that is this thread have appeared in support of the vitriol. The list of your friends on here is longer than the list of the enemies you'd like to have on here. (I suspect it's the reverse at work). There are FAR more posts started by you and your "buddies" than by the list you started this thread with. Why not just use the politics forum? You can all rub each other up the right way on there and not be interrupted by anyone much, or maybe it flies in the face of the "spreading the word on as many forums as possible" which was a tenet of the existence of the BNP. The majority of foot stamping is definitely yours, btw. Good post, Study, politics talk really should be kept to the politics forum, I think politics here brings out the worst in the right leaning people who are still so on a high after the last years events they can't quite contain themselves or maintain their dignity. Like children at the end of race jumping and screaming "we won" ![]() Gullible stooges like twizzle22 who doesn't have a tenth of the intelligence or wit of all the posters he insults, yet insists on foisting his juvenile, sixth forum politics on to them and endorsing posts of people who unbeknown to him, have him on a string. |
|
By:
dave1357 23 Feb 17 19:34
Betfair's rules: If any race is reduced to four runners or less, all each-way bets will be taken as ‘all-to-win’ given that there are no places The problem is that a double is just a double, the order of the events should be irrelevant. If you go with the 4 horse race first, it becomes a win double and loses. Go in the actual order of events, you have a place bet in a race which doesn't have place betting. Def one for IBAS more to see what logic they use to refuse to pay out... |
|
By:
dave1357 23 Feb 17 20:03
@penzance in this case they are order dependent, as I said, if the 4 horse race went off first, the first leg of the each way double becomes a win double because it is now 4 runners, but in the actual order of events you can argue that the place bet becomes a win bet. Imagine if 5 horses had gone to post, he would have been settled place place it wouldn't matter which race went first. @mmmalushka that's just the same question. Because if you settle the bets in reverse the 4 horse race becomes win only, so it's a win double. My only point here is that settling a double in a different order gives a different result, which really shouldn't happen with a double. |
|
By:
Oh dear David |
|
By:
Oh, and if you want a list of regular posters who are not 'loony left echo chamberites' the 7 you mentioned.
You can add my little list above to: Akabula Dotchinite Ibrahima sonko treetop burt06 casemoney stickyvicky wildmanfromborneo and others I can't think of right now So that's 13 at least, who already agree with you, Torquemada. I'd say the people you whinge about are in the minority. So it's hardly an echo chamber, but I will grant you, the lunatics have indeed taken over the asylum. |