Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 64 comments are related to the topic:
Anyone do this in the eighties ?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 64
By:
akabula
When: 18 Dec 16 00:04
I had bundles of football stuff. Wish I'd had them transferred. Just tossed them.
By:
crags
When: 18 Dec 16 00:14
I'm tempted! Excited
By:
pumphol.
When: 18 Dec 16 00:14
curious-cat    17 Dec 16 23:29 
Despite being introduced a year after Betamax, VHS VCR standard had two very important advantages over Betamax.  The first was that the VHS standard was a third of the price of Betamax.  As a result it was more easily affordable for the masses and people began to sacrifice quality for affordability.  The second major advantage of VHS was its recording time.  Where Betamax cassettes could record for only an hour, VHS tape could record for two.  In 1976, a one hour Betamax cassette was a piece of high end technology that would cost $15 if bought in bulk, while some retail prices could go as high as $30.[2] While attempts were made, by Sony, to create a two hour cassette in response to its competitor, VHS took things one step further by introducing a recorder that allowed up to four hours of taping.[3] By 1988 Sony and the Betamax format had conceded defeat.


That may well have been the case in 1976 but by the time we bought our machine in the UK in 1980 you could record three hours of programmes &  that was probably the case for all machines by that time.
By:
akabula
When: 18 Dec 16 00:16
Spotted my mistake. Happy
By:
crags
When: 18 Dec 16 00:19

Dec 18, 2016 -- 12:14AM, pumphol. wrote:


curious-cat    17 Dec 16 23:29  Despite being introduced a year after Betamax, VHS VCR standard had two very important advantages over Betamax.  The first was that the VHS standard was a third of the price of Betamax.  As a result it was more easily affordable for the masses and people began to sacrifice quality for affordability.  The second major advantage of VHS was its recording time.  Where Betamax cassettes could record for only an hour, VHS tape could record for two.  In 1976, a one hour Betamax cassette was a piece of high end technology that would cost $15 if bought in bulk, while some retail prices could go as high as $30.[2] While attempts were made, by Sony, to create a two hour cassette in response to its competitor, VHS took things one step further by introducing a recorder that allowed up to four hours of taping.[3] By 1988 Sony and the Betamax format had conceded defeat.That may well have been the case in 1976 but by the time we bought our machine in the UK in 1980 you could record three hours of programmes &  that was probably the case for all machines by that time.


pumpy, if you read all of the info on google, it explains further that Betamax were slower than VHS to offer longer recording tapes. By the time they had caught up, VHS had the lion's share of the market.

By:
pumphol.
When: 18 Dec 16 00:26
Must have been F@ck#d from the sales in the states then, when we got ours it was pretty new in the UK & defo had three hour tapes, I suppose those first few years were key in America & ultimately it was their sales that finished it off.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 18 Dec 16 06:06
first time in a video hire shop the choices came down to Jazz singer (neil diamond) or kramer vs kramer, my sister was with me and it was a family choice? super boring.
Tons of exploitative axe murder films then. Usual cover was a girl with blood coming off her face with a dark figure in the background with an axe.
we watched the jazz singer.
By:
bigmo
When: 18 Dec 16 11:59
Had a video shop and then a mobile video van. I think Warner Brothers were charging something like £70 a video for top titles when they came out.
Was always worried about tapes getting chewed up in the machines.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:03
there was actually nothing wrong with betamax (for it's time) t'was sppsdly the better format  but they were simply bought out  - thats the story i got.

personally  i think every electroinic device from that long ago was a heap of sh1te  - our recorder never got used as it was a days work trying to set it up to record a programme  - worse still you sat down to watch Fools and Horses and ended up getting Songs of Praise  Cry

and anyone who had a brick cell phone -   ..... why ?
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:03
and cars in the 80s were crap too
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:04
so were things like toasters , fridges  ,basically anything that 'worked'
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:04
music was good though Happy
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:06
the old style food mixers -  the ones from the 50s and 60s 


now they are still going strong today - ;lots of old dears still have them

weird world
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:07
must be a reason for this
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:07
and why are car batteries still massive in 2016 ?  -   they weight a ton
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:08
i thought in 1990 that by now you would have some sort of micro chip  or solar powered battery
By:
pumphol.
When: 18 Dec 16 12:32
Coachbuster    18 Dec 16 12:04 
so were things like toasters , fridges  ,basically anything that 'worked'

Coach I think your find fridges & washing machines were better built 30 years ago than they are now, washing machines are purposely built not to last, when you think how technology has improved over the last 30 years this must be one of the biggest worldwide cons of our times.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:45
pumpy lad

agree that things arent made to last - but back in the day  it was an outside bet that your house burnt down  if the freezer was over 5 years old  Shocked

i used to see mums hairdryers explode and catch light while she was using them  .

recorders used to chew up cassettes , cars frequently wouldn't start on wet or cold mornings - always woken up by that sound  Grin    televison screens used to roll - wtf was that about ?  Laugh   

I like stuff today  Cool
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 12:47
although they now need to find a cell phone battery  that doesn't run flat after 10 hours of non use - the reason why i have 2 and keep one perm on charge
By:
pumphol.
When: 18 Dec 16 12:50
Our fridge is 25 years old, still works perfectly


The wife is a lot older but is to say she still works perfectly would be optimistic Laugh
By:
Aunty Post
When: 18 Dec 16 13:04
We had the Sony C7 Betamax, bought in '82.

The thing was as heavy as a pile of bricks. Solid full of components and superb quality.

The problem was that when it went wrong, it was a fifty quid touch every time, and later when the sound gain failed
we just gave up on it, and bought the all singing, all dancing Panasonic vHS which I still have.

I sold the C7 early this year, with the problem declared, for £85.00 which wasn't bad really!
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 15:21
I was perhaps referring to stuff manufactored in the late 70s  Pumpy.


Maybe things improved when we started to import from Japan /Far East ,maybe their standards increased with time.Or there was less to go wrong .

UK produced a lot of stuff in the 70s that simply fell apart - hence why we started to buy certain foreign goods  (as well as cost)
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Dec 16 15:23
plus technology has improved 2million fold -

chewed up tapes - i mean to say Cry

frustrating trying to piece together a cassette with sticky tape Devil
By:
Platini
When: 18 Dec 16 18:19
Betamax came before VHS if I remember right. Always seemed way cooler cos we never had one but our neighbours did. Eventually we got a VHS but I remember bunking off school and going round to a mates house to watch all his old man's video nasties on Betamax. Laugh
By:
cricketjon
When: 19 Dec 16 16:01
i bought a V2000 in the early 80s which only taped off the telly which was p1ss p00r planning on my part as there was very little porn on the telly in them days, C4 excepted
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com