We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
in your dreams
![]() |
|
By:
let's be honest - they are simply out to wreck as much of brexit that the thick northerners voted for. you know we can trust the big bosses and their supporters like dave and breeding on here.
I have to laugh at how dave and breeding back a system that allows so much cheap labour and non union workers to exist on and in such poor conditions - THE EU |
|
By:
Have a lie down, lfc, you autistic tart!
|
|
By:
Other countries are not the same as England. They look at England and are amazed, they do not have the same mentality.
|
|
By:
Do you doubt this? take a look around at the rest of the world.
|
|
By:
The Secretary of State's ease regarding his ability to give notice under Article 50 was based squarely on the Crown's prerogative power. His counsel made it clear that he does not contend that the 2015 Referendum Act supplied a statutory power for the Crown to give notice under Article 50. He is right not to do so. Any argument to that effect would have been untenable as a matter of statutory interpretation of the 2015 Referendum Act.
That Act falls to be interpreted in light of the basic constitutional principles of parliamentary sovereignty and representative parliamentary democracy which apply in the United Kingdom, which lead to the conclusion that a referendum on any topic can only be advisory for the lawmakers in Parliament unless very clear language to the contrary is used in the referendum legislation in question. No such language is used in the 2015 Referendum Act. Further, the 2015 Referendum Act was passed against a background including a clear briefing paper to parliamentarians explaining that the referendum would have advisory effect only. Moreover, Parliament must have appreciated that the referendum was intended only to be advisory as the result of a vote in the referendum in favour of leaving the European Union would inevitably leave for future decision many important questions relating to the legal implementation of withdrawal from the European Union. It's f*cking impressive that your knowledge is greater than that of the judges, the secretary of state, and their legal team. You should give the appeal team and theresa a call to see if you can help out. |
|
By:
Britain has the power to leave the EU without triggering A50.
Its very simple, we just leave. |
|
By:
lfc left ages ago
|
|
By:
Tory MP Stephen Phillips resigns over the government policy and direction,he can no longer represent the views of his constituents.
![]() |
|
By:
Does not matter if it's legally binding or not (it's not), because in effect it is - politically binding that is, nobody is going to overturn Brexit, it would be career suicide.
|
|
By:
rich privileged elite from rich privileged elite political background interferes with british democracy - now we know !
http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/brexit-legal-challenge-gina-miller-argues-defending-democracy-is-the-best-way-to-spend-my-money-a3387101.html |
|
By:
Think you have this the wrong way round Theresa May's government tried to interfere with democracy YDSC
|
|
By:
open borders flood the country = breeding mad
|
|
By:
horrible witch is getting plenty of stick in the papers,
nicely summed up in the Express ![]() |
|
By:
Are you all for Foreign managers, owners and players running our football teams?Surely we could play football and manage and own our teams
for far less money? |
|
By:
6 months ago: "we demand that UK courts should be the ones to decide on UK legal matters."
Now: "These judges are the enemy!!!" |
|
By:
I think leavers were after a Hitleresque type of character to enact their wishes unfortunately they ended up with Theresa May.
|
|
By:
Does this mean we have to stop telling people to go home for the time being?
|
|
By:
no Ron keep up the good work son
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
When I lived in Holland German far right wingers were attacking Turks in racially motivated attacks in Germany
when Germans visited Holland as lots do on their vacations the Dutch kept telling them "Go Home!" I hope this starts happening to Brits holidaying in Europe it might make them realize there should be no room for this far right rhetoric in this country. |
|
By:
This might allay your fears a little mobo.
https://fullfact.org/immigration/why-do-migrants-and-asylum-seekers-want-come-uk/ |
|
By:
we know why they want to come to the UK thanks
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
two foreigners interfering in our democracy self interest
the woman comes from a foreign privileged elite political bacground nothing in common with most people in this country |
|
By:
that is the best you can do dave - he loves the veiled threat
|
|
By:
The Portugese Hairdresser voted for Brexit
|
|
By:
Welsh Government @WelshGovernment
The Counsel General intends to make an application to intervene in the proposed Article 50 appeal before the Supreme Court #brexit |
|
By:
Haven't read the thread but had this emailed to me.
The real issue is the confusion about Sovereignty. It is "The People" that are Sovereign. This is reflected in International Law, because the Laws of Nations are based on the Rights, Liberties, and Freedoms of the individual. Parliament is not "Sovereign". This is a very dangerous assumption, that infers no restraints or limits upon its power. Parliament does not have Divine Right. It is constrained, it is limited, therefore it cannot be "Sovereign" As Lord Acton said: “Limitation is essential to authority. A government is legitimate only if it is effectively limited.” That is what the Nuremberg Trials said too, when you think about it, because the argument that what Hitler and the Nazis did, was "legal" because they "didn't break the Law" is absolute hogwash. This is the assumption of Divine Right, the implementation of the lawless State, where "The Law is what 'we' say it is", and Government cannot simply create Law to suit whatever it wishes to do (something the EU today, is actually doing, and it is why every member Nation must get the heck out of the EU asap). This is what those so called "Judges" yesterday, were declaring - that Parliament is our Master, and NOT our SERVANT! It's a declaration that Parliament can do whatever the heck it likes! It is the exact same assumption, that we have fought Civil Wars over, executed a King over, had Revolutions over, had Uprisings over, and have fought tooth and nail, including in foreign wars, to oppose, because it is everything we have ever stood against as a Nation, for CENTURIES! Yet these dangerous imbeciles are attempting to slip it in via the back door of a COURT? Make no mistake, and I am being deadly serious in this, IF THIS NONSENSE STANDS, THEN IT IS A DECLARATION OF WAR ON THE BRITISH PEOPLE! . ------------------------------------------------ As posted in http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/11/04/brexit-shakespeare-dead-right-lawyers/ |
|
By:
JD certainly has a way of putting things bigmo
![]() ![]() ![]() "Face it, we Brexiteers have enjoyed more than four deliriously happy months bathing in bitter Remainer tears, feeding on their sorrow like misery-sucking vampires, relishing every moment of their denials, their tantrums, their toys-cast-from-prams. So it’s only natural that with the roles temporarily reversed, the Remaintards should seize their brief moment in the sun and begin crowing as if somehow those three lefty ponces in ermine (or whatever it is that left-wing High Court Judges wear: thongs? Gimp suits?) were now going to stop us exiting the EU." |
|
By:
Other countries are not the same as England. They look at England and are amazed, they do not have the same mentality
yes they view us as island monkeys. they once sent one to hartlepool and they killed ti thinking he was a black man |
|
By:
the monkey was hanged because the locals thought it was a French spy, according to legend.
I'll hear nothing bad said about the wise people of Hartlepool - they led from the front with the Brexit vote. Every one a hero. |
|
By:
Britain has the power to leave the EU without triggering A50.
Its very simple, we just leave. id like to see it. our economy would grind to a halt. of course we would still let goods in.....but no way can goods get past eu customs...so they will get turned back. |
|
By:
bigmo
prob best not to pay any attention to the likes of breitbart their ultra right wing agenda has no interest in "the people", it is only interested in creating civil unrest in the hope that dictatorship is imposed. |
|
By:
the monkey was hanged because the locals thought it was a French spy, according to legend.
I'll hear nothing bad said about the wise people of Hartlepool ![]() true to form then |
|
By:
FFS Jockey ...
... it was a spy. And it didn't speak a word of English |
|
By:
as far as attacks on judges are concerned, remember that Turkey's Erdogan has attacked the judges in his desire to making his country an islamic caliphate.
|
|
By:
reading twitter.
interesting that some right wing are really not happy. responding in an inciting manner....civil unrest. makes you wonder how different they actually are to the religion they love to hate? |
|
By:
not at all G1 just other sides of the same coin.
|
|
By:
and the proposed ukip leader shot herself in the foot today regarding the turkish judges.
some people seriously are too stupid to be in such positions. thats the state of this country. we will make a titanic success of it no doubt....... |