Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
scandanavian_haven
25 Oct 16 10:18
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 May 11
| Topic/replies: 17,249 | Blogger: scandanavian_haven's blog
TEN YEARS they have been talking about this and trying to push it through..........10 YEARS.

Even if Heathrow gets the go ahead today, it'll be another year before they can  try and get it through parliament and even then there will be lengthy legal challenges from local councils and whatnot.

Other countries must laugh at Britain, nobody spends more time, effort and money trying to get something done. Embarrassing.
Pause Switch to Standard View Heathrow Expansion
Show More
Loading...
Report ooO{Alpha Centauri}Ooo October 25, 2016 12:11 PM BST
Ten years ago the tories opposed it and fracking for that matter, in government and they're all for it.
Report xmoneyx October 25, 2016 12:18 PM BST
Chinese hong hong airport took 5 mins
Report Wesdag October 25, 2016 2:39 PM BST
This is one of the downsides of democracy.

Because nimbys have votes, they hold the government & the whole country to ransom.

Apparently while the UK has been dithering about building a single runway, China has built over 60 new airports.
Report Crisp77 October 25, 2016 7:03 PM BST
It sounds very popular. One commentator described it as a runaway success.
Report The Leopard October 25, 2016 7:13 PM BST
Ohhhhhhhhhh !
Report The Leopard October 25, 2016 7:13 PM BST
Wink
Report Crisp77 October 25, 2016 7:17 PM BST
If you dont like it I will take off.
Report G1_Jockey_4 October 26, 2016 8:31 PM BST
This is one of the downsides of democracy.

Because nimbys have votes, they hold the government & the whole country to ransom.


brexit to a tee
Report ebulGery October 26, 2016 8:35 PM BST
I agree with OP, it costs this country dear

and Wesdag

There should be one enquiry, and that is it.

We are harming our own country with this stuff.
Report ebulGery October 26, 2016 8:36 PM BST
This country would do a good deal better, if we to consider what benefits the country as a whole

This should take precedent over individuals
Report ebulGery October 26, 2016 8:40 PM BST
G1_Jockey_4  • October 26, 2016 8:31 PM BST 


This is one of the downsides of democracy.

Because nimbys have votes, they hold the government & the whole country to ransom.

brexit to a tee


That was a majority vote, we govern ourselves by majority decisions
There was only one referendum...the result has been accepted

So where on earth is the comparison???????????????????????????
Report Dr Crippen October 26, 2016 9:07 PM BST
Cameron promised Londoners no third runway at Heathrow.

I wonder how they feel about that?
Report mokegibboni October 26, 2016 9:20 PM BST
xmoneyx - we had to build the new Hong Kong airport very quickly before the Chinese took over. The Chinese government were up in arms about us building that airport as they were hoping to get hold of the money after their take over of the province. The British government were absolutely determined that the Chinese authorities were in no way going to get hold of the billions of pounds held by the Hong Kong government, so they made a quick decision to spend as much of it as possible by constructing a man made island off shore and building a state of the art modern international airport.

Needless to say, nearly all the contractors involved in the project were of UK origin.

Well done UK government I say!
Report ebulGery October 26, 2016 10:30 PM BST
Pity they could not do the same for our own countrySad

May is making her own decisions not Cameron's...personally I wanted Gatwick to get itSad
But a decision had to be made. By delaying it, the costs soar.

There should one enquiry, all objections are made there, then after consideration a decision is made, compensation being paid where applicable.
Then build it!
Report ebulGery October 26, 2016 10:35 PM BST
If Londoners want to blame anyone blame Cameron.

He should have made the decision to build it elsewhere.

Then Heathrow would not been expanded!
Report zorrostrikes October 27, 2016 5:11 AM BST
got to say to me this is bizarre. the country is tiny. trying to compact everything into London seems bizarre. why not someplace just outside london. half an hour travelling distance by bus or train. set up free travel tickets for plane ticket holders.
Report G1_Jockey_4 October 27, 2016 8:58 AM BST
probably because a large slice of goods coming in will end up in london and the surrounding areas.

if you built a new site...well that involves more planning and $$$$$$
Report Breedingmad October 27, 2016 9:40 AM BST
The government does what it wants and are never held to task when in power typical Tory push through will be the same
with Brexit the little people have no voice big money talks.
Report Misti October 27, 2016 11:51 AM BST
I read the runway may cross the M25. Sounds like an accident waiting to happen.
Report Breedingmad October 27, 2016 12:26 PM BST
Yet more investment in the Northern Powerhouse.
Report mokegibboni October 27, 2016 1:04 PM BST
I was wondering why they couldn't utilise Northolt which is just 6 miles north of Heathrow with the A40 running alongside the existing RAF base. The RAF could move elsewhere and turn what is already an established airport into an another commercial London airport. They would need to extend the 5500ft runway, but the surrounding area is less built up than around Heathrow. They may even be able to have another parallel runway similar to Heathrow.

Heathrow's runways are 12250ft (2.5 miles) long!
Report zorrostrikes October 27, 2016 6:28 PM BST
make Mokegibboni a minister - best answer yet.
Report Johnny_Mustang October 27, 2016 8:25 PM BST
I don't want to be crass or indelicate, but the financial might of London props the rest of the country up. So we'll have our third runway anywhere we like thank you very much.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com