Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
scandanavian_haven
25 Oct 16 10:18
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 May 11
| Topic/replies: 17,249 | Blogger: scandanavian_haven's blog
TEN YEARS they have been talking about this and trying to push it through..........10 YEARS.

Even if Heathrow gets the go ahead today, it'll be another year before they can  try and get it through parliament and even then there will be lengthy legal challenges from local councils and whatnot.

Other countries must laugh at Britain, nobody spends more time, effort and money trying to get something done. Embarrassing.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 23
By:
ooO{Alpha Centauri}Ooo
When: 25 Oct 16 12:11
Ten years ago the tories opposed it and fracking for that matter, in government and they're all for it.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 25 Oct 16 12:18
Chinese hong hong airport took 5 mins
By:
Wesdag
When: 25 Oct 16 14:39
This is one of the downsides of democracy.

Because nimbys have votes, they hold the government & the whole country to ransom.

Apparently while the UK has been dithering about building a single runway, China has built over 60 new airports.
By:
Crisp77
When: 25 Oct 16 19:03
It sounds very popular. One commentator described it as a runaway success.
By:
The Leopard
When: 25 Oct 16 19:13
Ohhhhhhhhhh !
By:
The Leopard
When: 25 Oct 16 19:13
Wink
By:
Crisp77
When: 25 Oct 16 19:17
If you dont like it I will take off.
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 26 Oct 16 20:31
This is one of the downsides of democracy.

Because nimbys have votes, they hold the government & the whole country to ransom.


brexit to a tee
By:
ebulGery
When: 26 Oct 16 20:35
I agree with OP, it costs this country dear

and Wesdag

There should be one enquiry, and that is it.

We are harming our own country with this stuff.
By:
ebulGery
When: 26 Oct 16 20:36
This country would do a good deal better, if we to consider what benefits the country as a whole

This should take precedent over individuals
By:
ebulGery
When: 26 Oct 16 20:40
G1_Jockey_4  • October 26, 2016 8:31 PM BST 


This is one of the downsides of democracy.

Because nimbys have votes, they hold the government & the whole country to ransom.

brexit to a tee


That was a majority vote, we govern ourselves by majority decisions
There was only one referendum...the result has been accepted

So where on earth is the comparison???????????????????????????
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 26 Oct 16 21:07
Cameron promised Londoners no third runway at Heathrow.

I wonder how they feel about that?
By:
mokegibboni
When: 26 Oct 16 21:20
xmoneyx - we had to build the new Hong Kong airport very quickly before the Chinese took over. The Chinese government were up in arms about us building that airport as they were hoping to get hold of the money after their take over of the province. The British government were absolutely determined that the Chinese authorities were in no way going to get hold of the billions of pounds held by the Hong Kong government, so they made a quick decision to spend as much of it as possible by constructing a man made island off shore and building a state of the art modern international airport.

Needless to say, nearly all the contractors involved in the project were of UK origin.

Well done UK government I say!
By:
ebulGery
When: 26 Oct 16 22:30
Pity they could not do the same for our own countrySad

May is making her own decisions not Cameron's...personally I wanted Gatwick to get itSad
But a decision had to be made. By delaying it, the costs soar.

There should one enquiry, all objections are made there, then after consideration a decision is made, compensation being paid where applicable.
Then build it!
By:
ebulGery
When: 26 Oct 16 22:35
If Londoners want to blame anyone blame Cameron.

He should have made the decision to build it elsewhere.

Then Heathrow would not been expanded!
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 27 Oct 16 05:11
got to say to me this is bizarre. the country is tiny. trying to compact everything into London seems bizarre. why not someplace just outside london. half an hour travelling distance by bus or train. set up free travel tickets for plane ticket holders.
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 27 Oct 16 08:58
probably because a large slice of goods coming in will end up in london and the surrounding areas.

if you built a new site...well that involves more planning and $$$$$$
By:
Breedingmad
When: 27 Oct 16 09:40
The government does what it wants and are never held to task when in power typical Tory push through will be the same
with Brexit the little people have no voice big money talks.
By:
Misti
When: 27 Oct 16 11:51
I read the runway may cross the M25. Sounds like an accident waiting to happen.
By:
Breedingmad
When: 27 Oct 16 12:26
Yet more investment in the Northern Powerhouse.
By:
mokegibboni
When: 27 Oct 16 13:04
I was wondering why they couldn't utilise Northolt which is just 6 miles north of Heathrow with the A40 running alongside the existing RAF base. The RAF could move elsewhere and turn what is already an established airport into an another commercial London airport. They would need to extend the 5500ft runway, but the surrounding area is less built up than around Heathrow. They may even be able to have another parallel runway similar to Heathrow.

Heathrow's runways are 12250ft (2.5 miles) long!
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 27 Oct 16 18:28
make Mokegibboni a minister - best answer yet.
By:
Johnny_Mustang
When: 27 Oct 16 20:25
I don't want to be crass or indelicate, but the financial might of London props the rest of the country up. So we'll have our third runway anywhere we like thank you very much.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com