May 14, 2016 -- 12:01AM, epicurean wrote:
If you do not have a solid understanding of mathematics and probability you cannot win long term ,unless you win the lottery for instance ,by pure chance.
I think that's probably 67.5% correct

May 14, 2016 -- 1:03AM, Mc Moonbeam wrote:
Not really Gery , i've been very ill for over a year now (mainly why i didn't post) but still betting/trading/pokering/investing the whole time .I guess i've just learned to exist like a lone wolf hunting but thanks for asking
So you must have been online a lot by what you've said there.
So why has your illness just impeded you from posting on here?

May 14, 2016 -- 1:10AM, Mc Moonbeam wrote:
So you must have been online a lot by what you've said there.Yes i have bills to pay .. food to cook & eatSo why has your illness just impeded you from posting on here? Because it becomes head consuming & being ill like to switch off & go to bed without trolls like you to deal with
I'm not a troll, just someone seeking answers to obvious contradictions.






May 14, 2016 -- 1:37PM, Slicer wrote:
How kind of you to remember me Mr 3011. Thanks for your good wishes, which are reciprocated. I hope you are prospering.
Afternoon Slicer
I remember the infamous thread well after spending what seemed an eternity around 3 years ago reading it, I trust all goes well? I'm afraid I'm treading water like practically everyone else on here these days searching for elusive "edge/ holy grail" which I don't believe really exists anyway if I'm being brutally honest. After a decent first year hit the first band of P charge and since then all but given up... we all want to escape the proverbial ratrace by making money here but not to be sadly.
May 14, 2016 -- 5:57PM, Ovalman. wrote:
what if the odds are wrong or you have information that would change the odds?
Short of someone being in the dressing room of the club involved, how would someone be privy to information that would contradict superior statistical analysis from software which has data processing skills above any human with access to information on backdated matches proven to be highly accurate to tiny fractions over a long period? They cant.
May 14, 2016 -- 6:17PM, Injera wrote:
You need to study more (maths is not always the key) but You must seek VALUE .. and try treat every bet independently (why are you placing that bet ?)...excellent advice from Mc.I often fail at treating each bet independently.Backing is buying. Doesn't matter if you're buying a bet or a classic car. What are the chances you will make a profit from your investment? If unsure, don't back that horse/team or buy that car.Trading is different and imo easier. Not looking for outcomes, just movements. Which price is likely to move which way and why?
I agree with each individual bet being unique looking for value but laying is also "buying" as technically you are backing the draw/other team so little difference other than backing 2 outcomes contrary to one

May 14, 2016 -- 11:22PM, annie. wrote:
It was a long time ago, crags
Years or decades?
- doing quite well tonight 
May 14, 2016 -- 11:22PM, annie. wrote:
It was a long time ago, crags
It's nothing to do with how long ago it was, but the fact that lots of men - as you said it happened time and time again- who didn't gamble would suddenly not just start gambling, but throw their money around like they'd been told they only had a week left to live. Doesn't sound very likely.


and this almost came in too - a whisker away !!
May 18, 2016 -- 10:50PM, Coachbuster wrote:
1 - 4 * 128.25 51.31 Back -51.31 this score was crazy odds at 128/1 and this almost came in too - a whisker away !!go against the common heard ALWAYS - sheep will lead you to the dosshouse !
Clearly not the case though is it as the odds on betfair are extremely accurate meaning the sheep eventually flock to the right price.