We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
I take it some don't believe there were four planes?
|
|
By:
wtc7 is important though mexico, because if that was proved to be not as reported it would cast doubt on all the rest.
|
|
By:
Torqu, if you have a theory as to what happened then please share rather then wittering on about an unimportant sideshow.
so, how many planes crashed? Who controlled them? Can we stick to the main story? |
|
By:
Don't tell me what the main story is, it's my fecking thread in case you hadn't noticed. Now jog on you pompous tool.
|
|
By:
Torqu..
This is not "your thread" in case you hadn't notice. Are you claiming ownership of everything posted in this thread? Do you really believe this thread is "your thread" Being rude to other people does not give you ownership of the thread. Hope that helps? Now stick to the main story of 911. |
|
By:
I have every right to decide what the main story is on my thread thank you very much. Being rude to other people! Feck me, you've got some cheek mate!
![]() |
|
By:
If you want to talk about the four planes all the time, start your own fecking thread. Here's an idea, you can title it THE FOUR PLANES OF 911.
|
|
By:
Go on, I dare you. Start a thread called THE FOUR PLANES OF 911 and I'll post up my thoughts on the matter to keep you happy.
|
|
By:
Torqu, I've already explained your mistake. This is not "your thread". You have zero ownership rights to this thread.
Being rude won't give you ownership. It is not your thread. Pretty simple really Torqu. I assume you understand your repeated mistake. |
|
By:
Give it up, Mexico. You know full well that George Bush flew two planes by remote control into the towers. Then he fired a missile into the Pentagon and pretended a plane crashed there. Then he blew the towers up. He blew up a field in Pennsylvania and pretended a plane crashed there. Then the cunning devil waited seven hours and blew up a building nobody had ever heard of, a building which hadn't been hit by a plane or missile.
You know it's true. |
|
By:
Going round in circles and stuff posted as fact because someone posted a vid on the net.
|
|
By:
How come then, Einstein, you seem to think you own the rights to the thread? Keeping on telling people to stick your idea of the main story? What about your repeated mistake you prize plum?
|
|
By:
Masher - you could be correct there. Must be a few you tube videos to back up that theory.
Torqu. I have not claimed to own the rights to this thread. I do not believe I own the rights to this thread. I also do not believe you own this thread. It is not "your thread" Come on Torqu, that is not difficult to understand, I'm sure you can grasp it? |
|
By:
I understand it perfectly mate. You've been caught out, you've embarrassed yourself, and you're now trying to shift attention to something else to save face. If you don't like people talking about something which is not YOUR idea of the main story on a thread I started, start your own fecking thread OR stop criticising people for talking about what they want to talk about.
Not hard to grasp is it? |
|
By:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUdJ41J_L8o
And then there is this -Dubya gave it away when he made virtually no reaction when he was told of the events taking place in New York. |
|
By:
I would say that that clip suggests the opposite.
|
|
By:
People see what they want to see. It'll never change.
|
|
By:
Torqu, I am sorry that you can't grasp the simple concept of that this thread is not your thread.
Why claim it is your thread? I can assure you that what passenger 75 had for breakfast is not the main story of 911. You starting a thread on a betting site does not give you ownership of 911 (it does not even give you ownership of this thread). Why would you claim this is your thread Torque if you understand perfectly it is not? Are there many aspects in life which you struggle to understand? Are you aware you have zero rights of ownership regarding this thread? How exactly will you stop people criticising people on this thread? Will you just be rude again? |
|
By:
He has things on his mind. At that point he has three buildings and a field to blow up, plus a missile to fire.
|
|
By:
Feck me, you're dim. Best you just jog on mate, you're stinking the place up with your repetitive nonsense. And if you must keep on replying, try to speed up a bit.
|
|
By:
I like your thinking masher. You seem to have solved this puzzle.
I knew the truth is out there. Nice one |
|
By:
Lol torque. You are calling somebody else "dim"
Bravo old chap - top bombing. Isn't that ironic. BTW do you actually understand this is not your thread? You can be rude to people if you want to but you don't have ownership to control what other people post. It really is quite a simple concept Torque. |
|
By:
Hypocrite alert ^^^
|
|
By:
That means a person who advocates something but does the opposite by the way.
|
|
By:
Mexico give it a rest ffs.
We all know that in the true meaning of the word that Torqu doesn't 'own' this thread but as a means of identifying the thread we would refer to it as Torqu's thread now move on please. Away back to the I love Pedants forum. ![]() |
|
By:
Looks like Mexico's meds have finally kicked in thank god, the dozy fecker is dimmer than an energy-efficient lightbulb. I can't stand hypocritical cyber bullies, they should be wound up at every opportunity.
|
|
By:
I called it my thread Aka because I knew it would wind up that idiot mexico, who clearly regarded it as his thread.
![]() |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Still being rude Torque?
Are LED light bulbs dim Torque? Aka, Torqu clearly does not understand the concept, You may love him but his rudeness is hardly enough to compensate for a lack of intelligence . |
|
By:
The funniest thing is, something he didn't seem to grasp, is that I pretty much agree with him on 99% of the whole 911 thing.
|
|
By:
NURSE! He's out of bed again!
|
|
By:
Anything useful to add Torque - or just carry on being rude?
|
|
By:
Yes, don't confuse the red ones with the yellow ones.
|
|
By:
Perhaps you should log off again to make us think you'd gone? Then you can come back later to have the last word of the evening.
|
|
By:
On my thread.
|
|
By:
Well, his light has gone out again (in more ways than one). I wonder if he'll be back?
![]() |
|
By:
Bacontrouts poor attempt at keeping the thread on planes and remote tech was rancid but since i rise so easily here stick this in your pipe and smoke it . http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/08/07/flight-control-boeings-uninterruptible-autopilot-system-drones-remote-hijacking/. Not that it is of any importance here but it does show your knowledge to be of a very low quality and falling short of the high standard needed on CC ,bring a knife to a gun fight and your gunna lose .
|
|
By:
@akabula 24 Oct 15 22:53 "I would say that that clip suggests the opposite. the 3 minute response of someone who refers to a 40 minute tape as a "clip". Come on, surely you can do better than that.
|
|
By:
the terrorists were said to be all killed ,if that is so then how did six of them return to life
|
|
By:
Opinions are like RSoles ...everybody's got one.
You have seperate fact from fiction ! Go on YouTube ...see what the Industry experts say. |