Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 127 comments are related to the topic:
911 conspiracy theories. Who believes them?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 127
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 21:39
I take it some don't believe there were four planes?
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 21:41
wtc7 is important though mexico, because if that was proved to be not as reported it would cast doubt on all the rest.
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 22:00
Torqu, if you have a theory as to what happened then please share rather then wittering on about an unimportant sideshow.


so, how many planes crashed? Who controlled them? Can we stick to the main story?
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 22:02
Don't tell me what the main story is, it's my fecking thread in case you hadn't noticed.  Now jog on you pompous tool.
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 22:20
Torqu..

This is not "your thread" in case you hadn't notice. Are you claiming ownership of everything posted in this thread? Do you really believe this thread is "your thread"

Being rude to other people does not give you ownership of the thread. Hope that helps?

Now stick to the main story of 911.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 22:24
I have every right to decide what the main story is on my thread thank you very much. Being rude to other people!  Feck me, you've got some cheek mate! Laugh
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 22:26
If you want to talk about the four planes all the time, start your own fecking thread.  Here's an idea, you can title it THE FOUR PLANES OF 911.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 22:28
Go on, I dare you.  Start a thread called THE FOUR PLANES OF 911 and I'll post up my thoughts on the matter to keep you happy.
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 22:32
Torqu, I've already explained your mistake. This is not "your thread". You have zero ownership rights to this thread.

Being rude won't give you ownership. It is not your thread.

Pretty simple really Torqu. I assume you understand your repeated mistake.
By:
masher
When: 24 Oct 15 22:34
Give it up, Mexico. You know full well that George Bush flew two planes by remote control into the towers. Then he fired a missile into the Pentagon and pretended a plane crashed there. Then he blew the towers up. He blew up a field in Pennsylvania and pretended a plane crashed there. Then the cunning devil waited seven hours and blew up a building nobody had ever heard of, a building which hadn't been hit by a plane or missile.

You know it's true.
By:
akabula
When: 24 Oct 15 22:34
Going round in circles and stuff posted as fact because someone posted a vid on the net.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 22:35
How come then, Einstein, you seem to think you own the rights to the thread?  Keeping on telling people to stick your idea of the main story?  What about your repeated mistake you prize plum?
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 22:45
Masher - you could be correct there. Must be a few you tube videos to back up that theory.

Torqu. I have not claimed to own the rights to this thread. I do not believe I own the rights to this thread. I also do not believe you own this thread. It is not "your thread"

Come on Torqu, that is not difficult to understand, I'm sure you can grasp it?
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 22:49
I understand it perfectly mate.  You've been caught out, you've embarrassed yourself, and you're now trying to shift attention to something else to save face.  If you don't like people talking about something which is not YOUR idea of the main story on a thread I started, start your own fecking thread OR stop criticising people for talking about what they want to talk about.

Not hard to grasp is it?
By:
Al Dente
When: 24 Oct 15 22:49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUdJ41J_L8o

And then there is this -Dubya gave it away when he made virtually no reaction when he was told of the events taking place in New York.
By:
akabula
When: 24 Oct 15 22:53
I would say that that clip suggests the opposite.
By:
akabula
When: 24 Oct 15 22:53
People see what they want to see. It'll never change.
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 23:00
Torqu, I am sorry that you can't grasp the simple concept of that this thread is not your thread.
Why claim it is your thread?

I can assure you that what passenger 75 had for breakfast is not the main story of 911. You starting a thread on a betting site does not give you ownership of 911 (it does not even give you ownership of this thread).

Why would you claim this is your thread Torque if you understand perfectly it is not?
Are there many aspects in life which you struggle to understand?


Are you aware you have zero rights of ownership regarding this thread? How exactly will you stop people criticising people on this thread?
Will you just be rude again?
By:
masher
When: 24 Oct 15 23:01
He has things on his mind. At that point he has three buildings and a field to blow up, plus a missile to fire.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:02
Feck me, you're dim.  Best you just jog on mate, you're stinking the place up with your repetitive nonsense.  And if you must keep on replying, try to speed up a bit.
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 23:04
I like your thinking masher. You seem to have solved this puzzle.

I knew the truth is out there.
Nice one
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 23:09
Lol torque. You are calling somebody else "dim"

Bravo old chap - top bombing. Isn't that ironic.


BTW do you actually understand this is not your thread? You can be rude to people if you want to but you don't have ownership to control what other people post.
It really is quite a simple concept Torque.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:10
Hypocrite alert ^^^
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:12
That means a person who advocates something but does the opposite by the way.
By:
akabula
When: 24 Oct 15 23:26
Mexico give it a rest ffs.
We all know that in the true meaning of the word that Torqu doesn't 'own' this thread but as a means of identifying the thread we would refer to it as Torqu's thread now move on please.
Away back to the I love Pedants forum. Laugh
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:29
Looks like Mexico's meds have finally kicked in thank god, the dozy fecker is dimmer than an energy-efficient lightbulb.  I can't stand hypocritical cyber bullies, they should be wound up at every opportunity.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:31
I called it my thread Aka because I knew it would wind up that idiot mexico, who clearly regarded it as his thread.  Laugh
By:
akabula
When: 24 Oct 15 23:32
Laugh
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 23:34
Still being rude Torque?
Are LED light bulbs dim Torque?


Aka, Torqu clearly does not understand the concept, You may love him but his rudeness is hardly enough to compensate for a lack of intelligence .
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:34
The funniest thing is, something he didn't seem to grasp, is that I pretty much agree with him on 99% of the whole 911 thing.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:35
NURSE!  He's out of bed again!
By:
Mexico
When: 24 Oct 15 23:36
Anything useful to add Torque - or just carry on being rude?
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:36
Yes, don't confuse the red ones with the yellow ones.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:38
Perhaps you should log off again to make us think you'd gone?  Then you can come back later to have the last word of the evening.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:45
On my thread.
By:
Torquemada
When: 24 Oct 15 23:55
Well, his light has gone out again (in more ways than one).  I wonder if he'll be back? Laugh
By:
breadnbutter
When: 24 Oct 15 23:55
Bacontrouts poor attempt at keeping the thread on planes and remote tech was rancid but since i rise so easily here stick this in your pipe and smoke it .    http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/08/07/flight-control-boeings-uninterruptible-autopilot-system-drones-remote-hijacking/.    Not that it is of any importance here but it does show your knowledge to be of a very low quality and falling short of the high standard needed on CC ,bring a knife to a gun fight and your gunna lose .
By:
Al Dente
When: 25 Oct 15 02:59
@akabula 24 Oct 15 22:53 "I would say that that clip suggests the opposite. the 3 minute response of someone who refers to a 40 minute tape as a "clip". Come on, surely you can do better than that.
By:
learner
When: 25 Oct 15 08:55
the terrorists were said to be all killed ,if that is so then how did six of them return to life
By:
Rockinron
When: 25 Oct 15 13:46
Opinions are like RSoles ...everybody's got one.
You have seperate fact from fiction !
Go on YouTube ...see what the Industry experts say.
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com