Its all to do with weight and gravity

Completely feasible Pm. time to move on.

It isn't completely feasible, Akabula, it's risible.  You might be right about moving on, of course, but many would vehemently disagree.

If the official report concerning WTC 7 were to be believed nobody would ever build a steel-framed skyscraper again, much less be prepared to live or work in one.  All the more laughable, then, that NIST refused to publish their scientific data for peer review on the grounds that it would jeopardize public safety!

I am also unfamiliar with the Tom Baker reference, but it sounds like another ad hominem argument to me.

I don't ignore the main story at all, I simply do not wish to engage in a debate without the necessary knowledge or expertise to argue my case.  And it is you, sir, who seem to be in the business of obfuscation and ignoring things.

Maybe some aluminum from the TT,s got into wtc 7 and exploded  again PM ?

The skill of the reported amateur pilots who on there first approach got it bang on target, not one but both of them, a bit fishy i think plus  a professional pilot mentioned this in one report, from a cessna to airliner id go for remote control

ok how many people will refrain from airing there opinions from fear of retribution ie job promotion ect
mexico knows where his bread is buttered quick get rid of the thermite damaged steel ect

one middle class pilot with no personal interest is easier to believe than yourself Mexico

Mi6, you have kept details of this one "professional pilot" secret. How do we know he/she is middle class with no personal interest. Is that just another bit of info you have made up?

So what did this one "professional pilot" say in this report? Come on let us see thes Magic report. It must be good if one report by one "professional pilot" is enough evidence to prove 4 planes were controlled by remote control.

Please shar this report MI6.

Btw you failed to explain what % of all "professional pilots" your one represents. How many "professional pilots" are there on this planet?

report

As for remote control planes! Brilliant that this one is still getting thrown about :)

Have little look at the difficulties of attaching remote technology from 14 years ago, onto jets designed in the 80s. Let me know your findings!

By late 1959, the only spy plane available to the US was the U-2. Spy satellites were another year and half away, and the SR-71 Blackbird was still on the drawing board.[13] In such climate, concerns appeared about the negative publicity from the foreseen capture of US airmen on the communist territory. Pilots' fears were realized in May 1960, when U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers was shot down over the USSR.[13] Not surprisingly, work intensified on an unmanned drone which would be capable of penetrating deep into enemy territory, and return with precise military intelligence. Within three months of the downing of the U-2, the highly classified UAV (called RPV back then) program was born, under the code name of Red Wagon.[13]

Just after the incident involving the US Navy destroyers USS Maddox (DD-731) and USS Turner Joy (DD-951), and even before it escalated into the presidential "Tonkin Gulf Resolution" and war with North Vietnam, the USAF had issued an immediate order for the UAV units to deploy immediately for Southeast Asia on any available C-130s or C-133s.[14] The first birds (drones) would be Ryan 147Bs (AQM-34s) piggy-backed on C-130s, after completing their missions they would be parachuted for recovery near Taiwan.

USAF drones (UAVs) of the Strategic Air Command deployed to the Republic of South Vietnam (RVN) as the 4025th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, 4080th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing in 1964. In 1966 the unit was redesignated as the 350th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, 100th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing.

The Squadron operated Ryan Firebees, launching them from modified DC-130A Hercules transport aircraft, normally two drones under each wing, each Hercules carrying 4 drones total. The UAVs deployed parachutes upon completing their missions and were usually recovered by helicopters which were tasked for those missions.

The North Vietnamese Air Force (NVAF) utilized U.S. Drone flights to practice their aerial combat skills, and although claiming several successful interceptions, only 6 are known to have been shot down by NVAF MiGs.[15][16]
sixties proto types were interesting

Hi mi6.

Thanks for that information. I am unsure of its relevance, perhaps you could explain?

Unfortunately, 757s and 767s dont operate 'fly-by-wire' (you knew that, right?), so you are suggesting a remote control system that could control hydraulics. It's an interesting, if flawed theory.

It also requires that the pilots to do nothing to attempt to regain control, or radio anyone about their loss of control.

Maybe you believe there were no pilots.

Which would mean you have to believe there were no flight crew, to notice the missing pilots.

To which it would follow that you believe there were no passengers, as they would notice a missing flight crew.

And this would indicate you are insane and in need of fresh air.

Torque, perhaps you could check my post from above and divulge any 'evidence' you have found that trumps a fireman at the scene explicitly stating it will collapse?

I've got feck all evidence mate, there's no point trying to engage me in an argument about it because I've only watched a few videos recently so know next to nothing about any of it.  As I said, I normally think conspiracy theories are nonsense.  The videos I watched about the third building though don't come across as the work of nutters in fairness, the people on it clearly weren't paranoid idiots, they were professional people like your fireman - professors, engineers, even a nobel prize winner!  It would be arrogant not to take them seriously don't you think?

What do the "truthers" think of this I wonder?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3286908/Is-Planet-X-Mysterious-fiery-globe-spotted-sky-coast-Florida.html

Mexico WTC7 is important. If the official line on how this collapsed is concocted then how can you trust the rest of the report?

MW

The story of the day is that 4 planes crashed into various buildings.

WTC7 is not important.


We aphave heard that mi6 believes these planes were flown by remote control. Apparently one "professional pilot" mentioned it in a lost report. I for one whole have t consider what 0.001% of "professional pilots" say in a lost report.

What was eaten for breakfast or what happened to WTC7 is a sideshow, it is not important. The story is that 4 planes crashed, not who had "bacon & eggs" in WTC7.

If you have any report that the planes did not crash or you have evidence of who controlled then then please share. It is well over a decade since 911 so plenty of time to publish a theory & show supporting evidence.