We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Oh feckin really because all I've heard from America is how Putin is not helping in his bombing campaign ffs the world is fecked up !
Show More
it´s not OK for Putin to bomb ISIS but it´s fine when the US bombs a hospital, while attempting to bomb ISIS.
According to the US rule book there can be only one sheriff.
According to the US rule book there can be only one sheriff.
U.S. officials went to TIME Magazine yesterday to announce that Russia will be creating more terrorists than they kill as a result of misguided airstrikes in Syria. “We believe if you inadvertently kill innocent men, women and children, then there’s a backlash from that,” Lieut. General Bob Otto, the Air Force’s deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance said. “We might kill three and create 10 terrorists. It really goes back to the question of are we killing more than were making?”
They are the land of the free.....to bomb who they damn well please!
And it's none of your damn business.
And it's none of your damn business.
USA only interested in the making of future films.
Just wait till there's a return of a republican hick in the White House soon.
Senate, congress and the White House.
They will end up bombing Iran.
Backing Saudi Arabia and Qatar while only ever pulling their tongue out at Russia (because they can hit back)
Further arming their own public, further changing the police into the army and the army into drones and robots all the while switching between 'latest threats' that they created...who's next, the peshmerga?
How they have the audacity to preach while being totally undermined by countless actions like this latest one must make Putin roll around pissing himself.
Senate, congress and the White House.
They will end up bombing Iran.
Backing Saudi Arabia and Qatar while only ever pulling their tongue out at Russia (because they can hit back)
Further arming their own public, further changing the police into the army and the army into drones and robots all the while switching between 'latest threats' that they created...who's next, the peshmerga?
How they have the audacity to preach while being totally undermined by countless actions like this latest one must make Putin roll around pissing himself.
Oct 4, 2015 -- 1:43AM, Ibrahima Sonko wrote:
USA only interested in the making of future films.
I started watching 'American sniper' but couldnt finish it. Did he ever shoot doctors or sick children?
putin is having a laugh because there's an idiot in the whitehouse, can't believe his luck 
a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy. and the police have already been militarised, and the armed forces purged, by guess who?
if the repubs win they will inherit a foreign and domestic basket case with 20 trillion in debt which at best will take decades to repair.
a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy. and the police have already been militarised, and the armed forces purged, by guess who?
if the repubs win they will inherit a foreign and domestic basket case with 20 trillion in debt which at best will take decades to repair.
putin is having a laugh because there's an idiot in the whitehouse, can't believe his luck
a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy. and the police have already been militarised, and the armed forces purged, by guess who?
if the repubs win they will inherit a foreign and domestic basket case with 20 trillion in debt which at best will take decades to repair.
a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy. and the police have already been militarised, and the armed forces purged, by guess who?
if the repubs win they will inherit a foreign and domestic basket case with 20 trillion in debt which at best will take decades to repair.
a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy.
The bombing didn't start in 2008 did it?
It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
Most people on the planet don't care too much about Americas domestic policies however protectionist many of them are.
The thought of another f uckin stooge appearing as some voice piece for the Carlyle group or other private equity sponk enterprise gunning for more reason to create division most people do care about.
The bombing didn't start in 2008 did it?
It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
Most people on the planet don't care too much about Americas domestic policies however protectionist many of them are.
The thought of another f uckin stooge appearing as some voice piece for the Carlyle group or other private equity sponk enterprise gunning for more reason to create division most people do care about.
Good article
.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3259146/PETER-HITCHENS-really-war-awful-against-evil.html
.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3259146/PETER-HITCHENS-really-war-awful-against-evil.html
Hitchens
I don’t think the British or American governments really want to fight the Islamic State. They just want to look as if they are doing so.
Russians think the same
"There is always a risk of getting bogged down but, in Moscow, they're talking about three to four months of operations," Alexei Pushkov, the head of the lower house of the Russian parliament's foreign affairs committee, told French radio station, Europe 1. He added that more than 2,500 air strikes in Syria by a US-led coalition against Islamic State (Isis) had yielded no results and was a pretence.
"I think it's the intensity that is important. The US-led coalition has pretended to bomb Daesh (IS) for a year, without results," Pushkov said. "If you do it in a more efficient way, I think you'll see results," he added.
Be interesting to come back in 4 months and see what is left
I don’t think the British or American governments really want to fight the Islamic State. They just want to look as if they are doing so.
Russians think the same
"There is always a risk of getting bogged down but, in Moscow, they're talking about three to four months of operations," Alexei Pushkov, the head of the lower house of the Russian parliament's foreign affairs committee, told French radio station, Europe 1. He added that more than 2,500 air strikes in Syria by a US-led coalition against Islamic State (Isis) had yielded no results and was a pretence.
"I think it's the intensity that is important. The US-led coalition has pretended to bomb Daesh (IS) for a year, without results," Pushkov said. "If you do it in a more efficient way, I think you'll see results," he added.
Be interesting to come back in 4 months and see what is left
I always think it is funny. They show us pics of daesh celebrations, columns of vehicles, and many pictures of inside Raqqa. They seem to have heaps of intelligence and detail, but they hardly ever assault what they call the headquarters of daesh.
If any of you know about warfare you will know that you take out systems and centres of control, supplies and organisation. Just as much as you would attack front line positions.
Come on tell me about it? They could take them out in days if they wanted to but the western coalition don't really want to. I have often said how odd it was.
If any of you know about warfare you will know that you take out systems and centres of control, supplies and organisation. Just as much as you would attack front line positions.
Come on tell me about it? They could take them out in days if they wanted to but the western coalition don't really want to. I have often said how odd it was.
too busy bombing hospitals and committing friendly fire etc apparently
Who do the Brits & America class as terrorists? So who are these other Groups who are attacking the government in Syria? Why do they NOT class them as terrorists? They make up their own rules when it suits them. It appears the US and it's cronies want the Middle East to implode
If you back the opposition to a sovereign government then thats a coupe d'etat in my book.
You could say the same about Libya.
Stirring up proxy war is something the 'allies' do particularly well.
You could say the same about Libya.
Stirring up proxy war is something the 'allies' do particularly well.
Ofc Ukraine was all the flavour of the month until russia stepped in and america reverted to dropping its arse
Gotta keep selling armaments, doesn't really matter who to or where.
Imagine no war in this n ew wor1d order? Now that would be a major problem.
Imagine no war in this n ew wor1d order? Now that would be a major problem.
The politics of this is just a complete mess. But the reason countries are taking sides is all about money and nothing about human rights.
The British have to pretend they are against ISIS because the British people are outraged about the atrocities they have committed.
The Qataris were funding the terrorists in Libya and when that was over they moved on to Syria.
The problem is that the Qataris and Saudis are big investors in Britain, so the British governrment can not upset these states.
if you want to see the power of the Qatari money look no further than the sponsors for the racing in Long champ today.
The British and french would be helping the Russians if it wasn't about money.
The British have to pretend they are against ISIS because the British people are outraged about the atrocities they have committed.
The Qataris were funding the terrorists in Libya and when that was over they moved on to Syria.
The problem is that the Qataris and Saudis are big investors in Britain, so the British governrment can not upset these states.
if you want to see the power of the Qatari money look no further than the sponsors for the racing in Long champ today.
The British and french would be helping the Russians if it wasn't about money.
The bombing didn't start in 2008 did it?
No, but the rubbleization did.
the afghan and iraq wars, you could argue if they were necessary or wise, but they were over in weeks and both had basic democracies and governments within months, and by 2008 iraq was stabilised and the sunni and iran backed terror groups were broken.
the "arab spring" wave of destruction can't be argued to be necessary or wise, it destroyed the stable and mostly cooperative states of libya, syria, yemen, almost egypt and much of north africa, and islamic groups are sweeping through africa and may soon be in the remaining middle eastern states, not to mention the rest of the world.
somalia was rubbleized under clinton.
It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
a visit to the mid east would dispute this, in fact in wide areas of the world he is ridiculed and disdained.
It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
No, but the rubbleization did.
the afghan and iraq wars, you could argue if they were necessary or wise, but they were over in weeks and both had basic democracies and governments within months, and by 2008 iraq was stabilised and the sunni and iran backed terror groups were broken.
the "arab spring" wave of destruction can't be argued to be necessary or wise, it destroyed the stable and mostly cooperative states of libya, syria, yemen, almost egypt and much of north africa, and islamic groups are sweeping through africa and may soon be in the remaining middle eastern states, not to mention the rest of the world.
somalia was rubbleized under clinton.
It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
a visit to the mid east would dispute this, in fact in wide areas of the world he is ridiculed and disdained.
It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539