Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
MadVlad
03 Oct 15 20:00
Joined:
Date Joined: 23 Feb 12
| Topic/replies: 10,456 | Blogger: MadVlad's blog
Oh feckin really because all I've heard from America is how Putin is not helping in his bombing campaign ffs the world is fecked up !

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 19
By:
TiptheOdds
When: 03 Oct 15 23:54
it´s not OK for Putin to bomb ISIS but it´s fine when the US bombs a hospital, while attempting to bomb ISIS.

According to the US rule book there can be only one sheriff.
By:
brendanuk1
When: 04 Oct 15 02:23
U.S. officials went to TIME Magazine yesterday to announce that Russia will be creating more terrorists than they kill as a result of misguided airstrikes in Syria. “We believe if you inadvertently kill innocent men, women and children, then there’s a backlash from that,” Lieut. General Bob Otto, the Air Force’s deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance said. “We might kill three and create 10 terrorists. It really goes back to the question of are we killing more than were making?”
By:
dustybin
When: 04 Oct 15 05:01
They are the land of the free.....to bomb who they damn well please!
And it's none of your damn business.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 04 Oct 15 07:43
USA only interested in the making of future films.
By:
dustybin
When: 04 Oct 15 09:11
Just wait till there's a return of a republican hick in the White House soon.
Senate, congress and the White House.

They will end up bombing Iran.
Backing Saudi Arabia and Qatar while only ever pulling their tongue out at Russia (because they can hit back)
Further arming their own public, further changing the police into the army and the army into drones and robots all the while switching between 'latest threats' that they created...who's next, the peshmerga?

How they have the audacity to preach while being totally undermined by countless actions like this latest one must make Putin roll around pissing himself.
By:
brendanuk1
When: 04 Oct 15 09:41

Oct 4, 2015 -- 7:43AM, Ibrahima Sonko wrote:


USA only interested in the making of future films.


I started watching 'American sniper' but couldnt finish it. Did he ever shoot doctors or sick children?

By:
polybot
When: 04 Oct 15 09:52
putin is having a laugh because there's an idiot in the whitehouse, can't believe his luck Laugh

a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy. and the police have already been militarised, and the armed forces purged, by guess who?

if the repubs win they will inherit a foreign and domestic basket case with 20 trillion in debt which at best will take decades to repair.
By:
polybot
When: 04 Oct 15 09:52
putin is having a laugh because there's an idiot in the whitehouse, can't believe his luck Laugh

a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy. and the police have already been militarised, and the armed forces purged, by guess who?

if the repubs win they will inherit a foreign and domestic basket case with 20 trillion in debt which at best will take decades to repair.
By:
dustybin
When: 04 Oct 15 11:15
a nuclear iran will be the only country left to bomb, everything else has been rubbleized by obama's moronic foreign policy.

The bombing didn't start in 2008 did it?
It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
Most people on the planet don't care too much about Americas domestic policies however protectionist many of them are.
The thought of another f uckin stooge appearing as some voice piece for the Carlyle group or other private equity sponk enterprise gunning for more reason to create division most people do care about.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 04 Oct 15 11:43
Good article
.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3259146/PETER-HITCHENS-really-war-awful-against-evil.html
By:
brendanuk1
When: 04 Oct 15 12:50
Hitchens
I don’t think the British or American governments really want to fight the Islamic State. They just want to look as if they are doing so.


Russians think the same
"There is always a risk of getting bogged down but, in Moscow, they're talking about three to four months of operations," Alexei Pushkov, the head of the lower house of the Russian parliament's foreign affairs committee, told French radio station, Europe 1. He added that more than 2,500 air strikes in Syria by a US-led coalition against Islamic State (Isis) had yielded no results and was a pretence.

"I think it's the intensity that is important. The US-led coalition has pretended to bomb Daesh (IS) for a year, without results," Pushkov said. "If you do it in a more efficient way, I think you'll see results," he added.


Be interesting to come back in 4 months and see what is left
By:
mobo
When: 04 Oct 15 13:59
I always think it is funny. They show us pics of daesh celebrations, columns of vehicles, and many pictures of inside Raqqa.  They seem to have heaps of intelligence and detail, but they hardly ever assault what they call the headquarters of daesh. 
If any of you know about warfare you will know that you take out systems and centres of control, supplies and organisation.  Just as much as you would attack front line positions.

Come on tell me about it?  They could take them out in days if they wanted to but the western coalition don't really want to.  I have often said how odd it was.
By:
dustybin
When: 04 Oct 15 15:01
too busy bombing hospitals and committing friendly fire etc apparently
By:
Kriskin
When: 04 Oct 15 15:39
Who do the Brits & America class as terrorists?  So who are these other Groups who are attacking the government in Syria?  Why do they NOT class them as terrorists?  They make up their own rules when it suits them. It appears the US and it's cronies want the Middle East to implode
By:
dustybin
When: 04 Oct 15 15:52
If you back the opposition to a sovereign government then thats a coupe d'etat in my book.
You could say the same about Libya.
Stirring up proxy war is something the 'allies' do particularly well.
By:
dustybin
When: 04 Oct 15 15:53
Ofc Ukraine was all the flavour of the month until russia stepped in and america reverted to dropping its arse
By:
mecca
When: 04 Oct 15 19:34
Gotta keep selling armaments, doesn't really matter who to or where.

Imagine no war in this n ew wor1d order? Now that would be a major problem.
By:
acc
When: 04 Oct 15 20:07
The politics of this is just a complete mess. But the reason countries are taking sides is all about money and nothing about human rights.
The British have to pretend they are against ISIS because the British people are outraged about the atrocities they have committed.
The Qataris were funding the terrorists in Libya and when that was over they moved on to Syria.

The problem is that the Qataris and Saudis are big investors in Britain, so the British governrment can not upset these states.
if you want to see the power of the Qatari money look no further than the sponsors for the racing in Long champ today.

   The British and french would be helping the Russians if it wasn't about money.
By:
polybot
When: 05 Oct 15 09:29
The bombing didn't start in 2008 did it?
No, but the rubbleization did.
the afghan and iraq wars, you could argue if they were necessary or wise, but they were over in weeks and both had basic democracies and governments within months, and by 2008 iraq was stabilised and the sunni and iran backed terror groups were broken.
the "arab spring" wave of destruction can't be argued to be necessary or wise, it destroyed the stable and mostly cooperative states of libya, syria, yemen, almost egypt and much of north africa, and islamic groups are sweeping through africa and may soon be in the remaining middle eastern states, not to mention the rest of the world.
somalia was rubbleized under clinton.

It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
a visit to the mid east would dispute this, in fact in wide areas of the world he is ridiculed and disdained.




It's a generalisation, but obama's image is significantly more honourable outside the USA than in it.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com