Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 143 comments are related to the topic:
Secrets of quantum physics.....
Secrets of quantum physics.....
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 143
|
By:
brassneck where are you getting all this claptrap from?
"AS from today the 2 nd September 2015 they still have not found the famous god particle. And its all scientific fillabuster,until they come up with proof. " Unfortunately for you scientists at cern announced on the 14th march 2013 they had found the higgs boson (also known as the god particle) |
|
By:
they have a standard model that has 11 out of 12 holes filled.their problem is that the 12 hole is round and square peg higgs will not fit the remaining round hole,try as the might higgs is never going to fit it,so its goodbye higgs,goodbye dark matter,goodbye big bang.
The very foundation of science depends on the boson being found to complete the standard model otherwise everything goes pear shaped and the laws of science will be deemed as not fit for purpose as an exercise.the big bang theory will go out the window,at the same time an event horizon had to be invented to prove all theory involving the working of the universe. SCIENCE WILL HAVE TO TELL A FEW FIBS TO PROTECT THEIR INDUSTRY. EVENT HORIZON=A WORD WHICH MEANS NOBODY HAS A CLUE WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE UNIVERSE,OUR THEORIES AND OUR MATHS DONT WORK OUT,AND NOBODY KNOWS WHAT TO DO OR SAY. But rest assured one thingis certain there is a few mistruths on the way in the world of science. |
|
By:
They say they found the bosun,but it disappeared too quickly to prove it was the particle they were looking for,in fact it appeared three times during the experiment,but we need to service and fine tune our collider to be absolutely certain .this could take about 2 years,but we shall be ready to roll again in 2016 to finally prove the standard model is complete.
we are 97% certain what we observed was the higgs. |
|
By:
The very foundation of science depends on the boson being found to complete the standard model otherwise everything goes pear shaped and the laws of science will be deemed as not fit for purpose as an exercise
I have heard more than one theoretical physicist express in effect that they’d be quite happy if it went ‘pear shaped’. The standard model doesn’t go anywhere, it doesn’t lead to any unification of particle physics and general relativity and without that there can be no understanding of the universe. There can’t be much joy graduating and being put to work just to complete a tired old jigsaw puzzle from the 1960s. In some ways it is all pretty bleak. The LHC, even though it’s been upgraded, can’t find the partner particles to complement the ones we already know and that would take us forward (in contrast to expectation). We’ve been at this stage for decades, stuck basically. Unless we start to accept that we simply don’t have the technology to complete the story experimentally people are going to continue to be disappointed for a long time. The only thing to do then is to take the philosophical mathematical models of the universe as they arise (like strings, like other universes) and accept them on faith. |
|
By:
Why isn't there a massive void (13.8 billion years times the speed of expansion)in the middle of the universe?
|
|
By:
accept them on faith.
Maybe we could have a high priest telling us which theories are good and which are bad |
|
By:
We already do, they're called the physicists that are still alive (science advances at one funeral at a time).
|
|
By:
I watched a program the other night ...says quantum physics totally cr*p and wrong !
|
|
By:
if you got cloned(like dolly the sheep was cloned) in this universe,would there be two of you in all the other universes.
 |
|
By:
Burgess - the expansion is in/between all existing objects. Including us, barring the 4 forces. Not just from the centre.
|
|
By:
My god, bodil, are you sober?
|
|
By:
No. annie?
|
|
By:
annie?
|
|
By:
But the expansion between all things in the early universe rather than being blown out from a central point is valid.
|
|
By:
Yes, good night
 |
|
By:
How are you btw?
|
|
By:
Apparently my previous reply is not registering. How are you?
|
|
By:
annie, you're alive!!! I can stop wearing black at last, hooray!!
|
|
By:
curiouser and curiouser, annie please tell me you have not changed your name to Alice.
|
|
By:
Come on annie - update please. Some (many) of us were fond of you. A few of the dinosaurs have become extinct.
|
|
By:
Sorry, bodil and boxing the fox, in not replying straight away, but I was playing poker. I am very tired and going to bed. I hope both of you are fine. Good night
|
|
By:
Good to know.
Kenny Rogers got it more or less right for our ambition. |
|
By:
my theory is this carp but possible
zero cant exist so to start with for a nano second you have +1 and -1 trouble is they cant both exist together as they create zero which cant exist in the nano second together they create a plain and create another +1 and -1 this carries on and on and on until gravity takes effect and slows the process down and therefore making time for other reactions to take place be that bosons photons atoms whatever but the initial start must of been very fast perhaps nano seconds before anything of substance slowed the process down its well known how stars work ie hydrogen the fuel fuses to make helium the star is stable until the hydrogen runs out then the stars uses the helium then the other elements but when it uses iron it stops as the process is unsustainable because of the maths ie gravity miniscule that down to the +1 and -1, because its all maths that adds up and +1 and -1 = zero but that cant exist so something else must |
|
By:
duke of puke - you must never return here unless we inivite you - which we will. But go away for a while.
Your science is like a burning penis - impracticable but superficially attractive. Who the hell are you, Jimmy? |