Indeed.

michio kaku,was on tv one night and worked out the maths of quantum theory and then done the maths of einsteins e=mc x2.
he proved that both are correct,but one contradicts the other at a point of the event horizon which he says is impossible.
his conclusion was until they get both in harmony all science laws are flawed.AND the science world do not know what to do.
basically he proved that anything that is impossible is possible.and the maths keep showing infinity answer in their results.
which he says is impossible.

Those ridiculing Injera's account about DNA reaction at a distance should read up on quantum entanglement.

What you are saying is that these DNA cells are entangled with the DNA cells of the subject’s body in another room (or another city perhaps) such that they exhibit behaviour as if they were still in place in the body.

My understanding of entanglement is this:

Until very recently to entangle a pair of photons or electrons for a whole second was very difficult. What’s more, particles have to be practically isolated from the environment they are in to maintain that entanglement. Other particles and fields in the environment disturb the particles and they decohere – their superposition of states is lost and as they are described by one and the same wave function, they become two separate particles with no connection to one another and the wave function is said to collapse. In effect, they are now two separate objects in the real physical world.

That’s just a simple particle pair. A sample of DNA from someone’s cheek must be hideously complicated, perhaps billions of atoms are involved. The reason we never see entangled classical objects in the real world is because they all too easily decohere. So, no twin versions of the same object. Incidentally, it is the same reason why ‘the cat’ is either dead or alive, not dead and alive at the same time. Admittedly some cheek DNA isn’t as massive as cat, but it is still very big as far as quantum mechanics goes.

Not trying to be a smart arse here, but what’s being claimed (apparently) is you can swab someone’s cheek, walk in the room next door. Or, get in your car and drive the DNA to somewhere far away. And in all this time, with all the countless particles in the environment, the heat – none of these things disturb this highly delicate quantum state? If it were that simple everything would be entangled all the time and life would be utter chaos.

I’m sorry, but to me it really does sound like ‘woo’. Let's see what the original study said, not what a pop science writer turned it into.

....maybe the same kind of thing as when Emoto put forward the water molecules react to human emotion theory.....

....sold a lot of books though.

http://www.hearttoheartassociates.com/co_create-power.htm

Hope this helps regarding the study I mentioned.

On a slightly different but related topic, the studies into the Placebo Affect are truly amazing.

Building Bridges Between Science and Spirituality

Says it all to me.

Spirituality has no basis in science as it's not based on evidence.

My favourite quote has been misattributed to Carl Sagan but it's very apt.

You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe.

Science and reason are constantly under attack by those who would enslave us with the shackles of religion and mysticism. They even resort to pseudoscience to try and convince us that they have evidence.
Backster doesn't say how he measured fear in plants or emotional reaction in DNA samples, you are asked to take that as read. Beware of this type of charlatan.

ferkn hell what did some people do before the internet was invented and they could find each other to validate their own crackpotedness. From your mad left corbyn/SNP-ites to their god botherer oppo's it's all a dismal downturn in global mental health.

...here is Jim at the brilliant TED......so much interesting and thought provoking stuff on so many subjects....

https://www.ted.com/talks/jim_al_khalili_how_quantum_biology_might_explain_life_s_biggest_questions

Building Bridges Between Science and Spirituality

Says it all to me.

Spirituality has no basis in science as it's not based on evidence.

There are people (very few) who can take you to other dimensions.

magic mushroom thread that way ---->

Might I advise you, gentlemen, to read To err is human, to float devine by Woody Allen.

the concept of your idea is quite possible,because it was the photon that they split in the experiment ,and photons are everywhere and even you are made from them.the problem is they misbehave when observed.So if you observe them they will not do what you want and are likely to disappear and appear elsewhere.
but the fact that they are photons and can perform their harmony when split and disappear and then reappear they prove the theory of einsteins "nothing can travel faster than the speed of light"incorrect.
So be careful with the wording of you description in your patent.

The photons also pass through you,and the have the ability to pass through themselves.
So the next question when we get a handle on their habits will be "can they escape out of a blackhole,and can the pass through it"

I think what happens is if 2 particles are say entangled with each other.

To exist in the observable universe each particle has a specific plain to exist in, and it cannot share that plain with any other particle. So as soon as you switch the particle to another state, which the entangled particle exists in it immediately flips into the now empty plain that its entangled particle has left.

So if for example a coin is flipped upside down the tails becomes immediately heads as it cannot exist as both heads at the same time.

There is a point where both particles can exist in both plain together or in each of its own plain, but as soon as you observe the particle it is forced to make a decision, it has to be in 1 plain 1 or the other.

If that sort of makes sense?

correct egner.

it is time to decide as soon as it is observed, and it is instant, no time delay.

and if I could figure out the mechanism by which the particle knows I would get a nobel prize for it.

Unfortunately im not that clever

....you see this is now interesting me more than ever....

...because if this is true...then it is we who are responsible for the creation of things....or the direction of the creation of things.....because we are the ones observing...and thereby acting as the catalyst for particles to decide which state they become.

...I think Einstein said something about this as well didn't he......

...he was sceptical about the quantum world because he said even if he is not looking at the Moon...he knows it is still there and exists....something like that......

...interesting....intriguing ..and baffling......

...and mastery and understanding of these processes will open up a pandoras box.

All the current theories are inelegant hence they are wrong qed. Much in the same way as the sun and stars going around the earth was wrong but more complicated theories attempted to prove it was correct.

we can not see it,we can not feel it,we can not find it,we can not observe it,we do not understand it, in fact we know nothing about it except we know its out there.And we believe its out there and its name is dark matter.and it controls the universe.
if dark matter was also titled" god"by the scientists,there would be blue murder in the science world.

We observe an effect, namely that galaxies don't fly apart despite the observable mass of matter being insufficient to hold them together. We postulate a cause, in this case additional matter which we haven't seen yet then go about looking for it. You can call it anything you like but but it's been shown time and time again that the god of the gaps, that is a supernatural explanation for an observation in nature, is a lazy and dishonest approach.