Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
10 Feb 15
11:42
Joined:
Date Joined:
24 Aug 11
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2359842-premier-league-reportedly-to-announce-44-billion-tv-rights-deal
Supposed to be worth £ 26 million a game. Who needs any paying fans now.?
And Falcao's £300 grand a week looks cheap.
Supposed to be worth £ 26 million a game. Who needs any paying fans now.? And Falcao's £300 grand a week looks cheap.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 47
|
By:
How on earth do the TV companies recoup their expenditure, given that the product itself is so drab?
|
|
By:
Not wrong there Alun, I've got Sky but seriously thinking about dumping them, too much hype and bluster, pundits saying the same repetitive phrases, too many pundits, everything is always so sensational.
|
|
By:
Premiership is Rugby.
Do you mean the Premier league ? |
|
By:
Sorry meant Premiersh1t
|
|
By:
The whole deck of cards will come toppling down at some stage and some big clubs will go to the wall (or maybe the government will step in and bail them out
 )Money is ruining the game, especially from the grassroots. |
|
By:
Have the international rights been sold yet?
|
|
By:
sky could end up in big trouble with the football because they almost have no choice but to offer stupid money for the rights
|
|
By:
5.1 billion !
|
|
By:
So where just say is the money going in a Stoke V Hull game if the are reputedly getting £26 mil a game.?
Stadium Match day costs to Stoke we'll say 1/2 million. Squad/Management wages for one game at a guess £2 mil. Insurance circa. 1/4 million. Thats under 3 million lets say, so who is getting the other £23 million per home game ? |
|
By:
10m average per live game i think, not ever game
|
|
By:
I don't want to say it's ridiculous cos in 3 yrs time when the next package goes for £10bn this will look reasonable - given the money, its a damning indictment that the top players play in Spain. A player like aguerro is not far behind Messi, ronaldo, suarez, neymar, but if he took the next stop he would be on the next plane in a shot
|
|
By:
Just wondering why all these rich shareholders and chairmen want involved in PL teams considering most of them have no affiliation with the actual club.
The whole set up stinks as the rich get richer and the little guys go to the wall. The whole thing will eventually come crashing. |
|
By:
Has anyone ever bought a Ford on the strength of watching Ford Super Sunday on SS1
 ? |
|
By:
RIP Football
 |
|
By:
i bought several amstels after watching the champions league and a chicken terry acky after watching at the races.
|
|
By:
^^U must be the target market then. You'll be driving a Ford Focus and munching prawn sandwiches next.
 |
|
By:
football used to be the working mans game before sky came along..most cant afford to go to a gae now let alone afford to watch the s hit on tv
|
|
By:
Last time I went to a Premiership match I was surrounded by tourists and not fans of the teams playing. Admittedly I had taken 2 of the tourists.
 |
|
By:
i'm sick of these tourists turning up with their cameras, with no inclination to chant, buy pies or go topless.
|
|
By:
If you told supporters 20 years ago clubs would get tens of millions a year from tv companies to show live games & then asked them how much would you think it would cost to watch a game at the ground how much would they say it would cost in today's money, a tenner maybe fifteen quid, to say its scandalous to charge £50 plus for a top game when the clubs receive so much revenue from sky etc is an understatement, once Rooney got 300k that was it for me, its a rich man's game now & its the one sport that should never have gone that way.
|
|
By:
EPL full of plastic clubs now but still not as bad as PVC Eindhoven.
|
|
By:
English football now is just a massive pi$$ take.
The prices charged would never be tolerated on the continent. |
|
By:
quality is sh!t too. If they can pass 5 yards consistantly they are now "world class"
|
|
By:
Read on the BBC website that due to TV money income, Burnley is a richer club than Ajax
Think that says it all. |
|
By:
Ok, Rooney's on £300k per week but what people don't realise is that after he's had tax deducted and paid his agent, he's probably got less than £150k left.
 Players' wages really started to explode in the mid to late 90s when a few players broke through the £40k pw barrier and then Man Utd paid Roy Keane £52k. I think it was around this time that Alan Shearer said "there will never be a better time to be a professional footballer". |
|
By:
Bosman ruling came into effect 1995
|
|
By:
Is the £10million per game for domestic rights or worldwide?
|
|
By:
if my sky costs more they can take it down f..k em
|
|
By:
Plenty of decent streams.
Ditched Sky years ago - best thing I've done for ages. |
|
By:
Domestic rights, zazu. International rights still to be sold.
If Sky stuck all the Premier League games on a dedicated channel and offered a cheaper package for all the other sport only, I wonder how popular Premier League football would actually turn out to be. I mean, has anyone actually paid for a BT sub to watch their Prem League games? |
|
By:
Blimey, how much did they get for international rights last time?
Yet more gravy to come. |
|
By:
Even on a conservative estimate, the total amount raised once international rights are taken into account is likely to top £8.5bn over three years from 2016-17.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/feb/10/premier-league-tv-rights-sky-bt |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Plenty of decent streams.
Ditched Sky years ago - best thing I've done for ages. Same here Wesdag, some clown on a forum weeks ago was accusing us of stealing from the sport. Not like sky took the game away from the masses and handed it to the few then. |
|
By:
The notion of ordinary citizens like us "stealing from the sport" of football is indeed hilarious.
I'm afraid that the ordinary citizen is way at the back of an enormous queue when it comes from 'stealing' from football. There is an entire industry, from top to bottom, dedicated to doing that for umpteen years. We don't even get a look in. |
|
By:
Until fans tire of getting bent over by Sky/BT, this farce will continue.
The problem is, BT/Sky & the Premier League are all organised and act in concert in this legalised theft. The fans sadly are not. This could never happen on the continent. Once again, the English/British get shafted, moan then shrug their shoulders and keep on getting shafted. |
|
By:
At the moment i pay for 4 season tickets. 3 will be gone after the season ends. This isn't a cutback on funds, but a decision i took a while back on a fukwit who was given a new contract when he should have been given a job on Huytons bins. I love my club but when i see things like that it rather annoys me.
The same will go for Sky if (and when) the prices go up. My club will be a lot better off (minus my considerably loss to them) from next season, but i will not be helping Sky along with this new deal.. |
|
By:
To put how rotten this game has become, into some perspective, the income from the first 9000 season tickets
sold, by all 20 premier clubs, went to agents last season. And this was only their cut of transfer deals. It doesnt include the 10pc or so they got from their players. |
|
By:
so much for the 5% they were supposed to give to grass roots football as from 1999 from the tv money. According to Radio4 they have averaged 1% a season since.
|