Judge isn't thick obviously. But she has ' judged ' this case very badly imo. She has literally based everything ( to the letter )against the law books, and has been absolutely deaf and blind to the evidence presented by the prosecuting council. Globally she has been heavily criticised. She got it wrong. OP should be facing a sentence related to murder.
Judge isn't thick obviously. But she has ' judged ' this case very badly imo. She has literally based everything ( to the letter )against the law books, and has been absolutely deaf and blind to the evidence presented by the prosecuting council.Globa
Well he does now she's said that a suspended sentence would be inappropriate! I must admit, I wasn't expecting her to say that after the lengthy preamble.
Well he does now she's said that a suspended sentence would be inappropriate! I must admit, I wasn't expecting her to say that after the lengthy preamble.
I don't agree with the 'experts' saying she has given a balanced sentence. As the most he could have got was 15, then a properly balanced sentence would have been 7 and a half.
I don't agree with the 'experts' saying she has given a balanced sentence. As the most he could have got was 15, then a properly balanced sentence would have been 7 and a half.
As the commentator just said 5 years is a heavy sentence for culpable homicide. Must appeal because this looks heavy handed. One man cannot be used as a weapon against society because they have awful gun crime figures.
As the commentator just said 5 years is a heavy sentence for culpable homicide. Must appeal because this looks heavy handed. One man cannot be used as a weapon against society because they have awful gun crime figures.
I am doing. A number of posters have made the point recently that a thread is not being visibly updated quick enough. I.e one assumes you are replying to the very last post, when in reality, after submitting the reply, you find one of more precede yours !
guinness2dear 21 Oct 14 09:47 Keep up Facts.I am doing. A number of posters have made the point recently that a thread is not being visibly updated quick enough. I.e one assumes you are replying to the very last post, when in reality, after sub
The ANC womens group have been supporting the family and flying them to the trial. On top of the fact OP has been paying them on a monthly basis because they had no money. This is not a done deal. In my opinion. Seems likegroups like the Women's ANC are putting pressure on the courts for sentencing of famous people, gun crime and crimes against women. There is lot more to this but there you go. There but for the grace etc.
The ANC womens group have been supporting the family and flying them to the trial. On top of the fact OP has been paying them on a monthly basis because they had no money. This is not a done deal. In my opinion. Seems likegroups like the Women's ANC
brigust1 21 Oct 14 09:57 The ANC womens group have been supporting the family and flying them to the trial. On top of the fact OP has been paying them on a monthly basis because they had no money. This is not a done deal. In my opinion. Seems likegroups like the Women's ANC are putting pressure on the courts for sentencing of famous people, gun crime and crimes against women. There is lot more to this but there you go. There but for the grace etc.
I hope you're not suggesting that anyone of us should be grateful , because we all have the potential to find ourselves in a similar predicament ? Because that is just nonsense.
brigust1 21 Oct 14 09:57 The ANC womens group have been supporting the family and flying them to the trial. On top of the fact OP has been paying them on a monthly basis because they had no money. This is not a done deal. In my opinion. Seems li
How the hell her parent's must be feeling now to know their daughter's life was only worth 10 months, trial was a joke, got off very lightly indeed, disgusting !
How the hell her parent's must be feeling now to know their daughter's life was only worth 10 months, trial was a joke, got off very lightly indeed, disgusting !
Justice systems vary so much throughout the world.
In the UK he would have been given life. In the USA he would have gotten a book deal and his own chat show. The Saffers are somewhere in between..
Justice systems vary so much throughout the world.In the UK he would have been given life. In the USA he would have gotten a book deal and his own chat show. The Saffers are somewhere in between..
About the most that could be expected in the circumstances.
I would still love someone to explain to me how it was reasonable to assume that he could fire a load of shots through a locked door without expecting to do some damage to the person behind it, as the judge previously suggested....
A farce from start to finish.
About the most that could be expected in the circumstances. I would still love someone to explain to me how it was reasonable to assume that he could fire a load of shots through a locked door without expecting to do some damage to the person behind
What is the point spending 4 or 5 days deliberating a sentence in the highest court in the land (and potentially an appeal) when it can be discounted by 5/6th at the whim of a parole board?
What is the point spending 4 or 5 days deliberating a sentence in the highest court in the land (and potentially an appeal) when it can be discounted by 5/6th at the whim of a parole board?
scandanavian, on your point about the rio olympics, he has already been banned from comps for the 5 yrs by their olympic associations.
...some with a bit of sense then.
scandanavian, on your point about the rio olympics, he has already been banned from comps for the 5 yrs by their olympic associations. ...some with a bit of sense then.
I knew he was banned from competing till 2019 but it could have been overturned if he appealed to the court of arbitration for sport, and considering he could be a free man whose done the time required, I would have imagined he'd have a strong case
I knew he was banned from competing till 2019 but it could have been overturned if he appealed to the court of arbitration for sport, and considering he could be a free man whose done the time required, I would have imagined he'd have a strong case
No Athletics promoter would ever dare to allow the bastard to compete at any event where there's a payment required.
Meanwhile,contrary to my beliefs,I hope that the 'gangster fellow' arranges for someone to give him his 'due desserts'.
No Athletics promoter would ever dare to allow the bastard to compete at any event where there's a payment required.Meanwhile,contrary to my beliefs,I hope that the 'gangster fellow' arranges for someone to give him his 'due desserts'.
manslaughter is when you punch someone, they hit their head on the pavement and it ends up killing them. no intent to kill but you've caused their death
what it isn't is firing 4 shots through a door into an enclosed space where any reasonable person would know death or serious injury was a near certainty
a circus from start to finishmanslaughter is when you punch someone, they hit their head on the pavement and it ends up killing them. no intent to kill but you've caused their deathwhat it isn't is firing 4 shots through a door into an enclosed space
Yep. Justice hasn't been done, or been seen to be done by today's verdict. A guilty of murder verdict would have been correct imo. The fact that the judge saw it as manslaughter is one thing. But she could have sentenced him to 15 years. 5 years, where he only has to serve one sixth, before likely release on parole is a travesty.makes a complete mockery of the system. The evidence presented by the prosecution, was, to the most part ignored by the judge. She seemed intent on basing her judgement solely on historic cases as per the law book.
Yep. Justice hasn't been done, or been seen to be done by today's verdict.A guilty of murder verdict would have been correct imo. The fact that the judge saw it as manslaughter is one thing. But she could have sentenced him to 15 years. 5 years, wher
"I knew he was banned from competing till 2019 but it could have been overturned..... I would have imagined he'd have a strong case"
Not really, because he was sentenced to 5 yrs, so surely no question they would overturn it within that time. But the way this has gone nothing would surprise me. Justice has not been done and he has got off very lightly indeed, and if he did ever return to sport I'm sure there would be a lot of hostile feeling against him, and rightly so. And even this 10 mths in jail looks like being a soft option on the hospital wing away from other prisoners in his own cell. The whole trial was a sick joke ! And that old woman judge !!
"I knew he was banned from competing till 2019 but it could have been overturned..... I would have imagined he'd have a strong case"Not really, because he was sentenced to 5 yrs, so surely no question they would overturn it within that time. But the
The judge's critics have argued that dolus eventualis includes the possibility of meaning to kill one person and ending up killing another, our correspondent says.
This is what annoyed me at the time, the judge seemed to be of the logic because he couldn't foresee it was Reeva then he's not guilty where as the natural interpretation is that the person is irrelevant and he could foresee the possibility of killing someone even if it had been an intruder and proceeded anyway
Prosecution appealing...The judge's critics have argued that dolus eventualis includes the possibility of meaning to kill one person and ending up killing another, our correspondent says.This is what annoyed me at the time, the judge seemed to be of
We live in a society where women get everything they want, I like to see a society
which allows men to get the best of things occasionally
I am on Pistorius side myselfwell someone has to be or these gets boringWe live in a society where women get everything they want, I like to see a societywhich allows men to get the best of things occasionally
Anyway the prosecution are appealing....which I never approve of myself..it is a vindictive form of justice does us no good
so he may yet get more
As for ever competing for S.Africa again I would be very surprised
A disappointing responseapart from Ken who thinks I am mad..could beAnyway the prosecution are appealing....which I never approve of myself..it is a vindictive form of justicedoes us no goodso he may yet get moreAs for ever competing for S.Africa aga
DonNo1 DonNo1 Date Joined: 11 Nov 10 Add contact | Send message 27 Oct 14 15:23 Joined: 11 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 6,363 | Blogger: DonNo1's blog Prosecution appealing...
The judge's critics have argued that dolus eventualis includes the possibility of meaning to kill one person and ending up killing another, our correspondent says.
This is what annoyed me at the time, the judge seemed to be of the logic because he couldn't foresee it was Reeva then he's not guilty where as the natural interpretation is that the person is irrelevant and he could foresee the possibility of killing someone even if it had been an intruder and proceeded anyway
They got there at least, albeit a year late. Amazing a case can all hinge on a (mis)interpretation like that
DonNo1DonNo1Date Joined: 11 Nov 10Add contact | Send message27 Oct 14 15:23 Joined: 11 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 6,363 | Blogger: DonNo1's blogProsecution appealing...The judge's critics have argued that dolus eventualis includes the possibility of