Just seen that i didn't reply to the last criticism from 2 years back


They reconsidered on nothing more than a hunch and before the girlfriend provided any evidence.

The police then ignored any evidence that pointed in a different direction.

Without reading up on it again i believe it was the relatives who were not going to get anything from the inheritance that found the silencer and reported it to the police.

I guess they had a motive to put JB in the frame but also it was Bamber's strange behaviour as well.

Julie Mugford came forward of her own volition to report what JB had said . She was not being investigated for anything , and such offences she had committed the police only found out about when she told them.

So that is why i said Bamber is sly , as he presents Julie's crimes and then says that she gave evidence against him for the murders, giving the impression that the police had her and so she came up with the murder story to get herself some credit with them . But clearly if she had never gone to the cops about the murders the police would never have known anything about robberies etc .

somehow he's supposed to have stabbed 3 people multiple times without leaving any trace of himself at the scene. takes some doing that

Tobermory...



Julie testified that Jeremy hired a hit man with a cast iron alibi, she never said he killed his family himself. Why did he cheat on her if she knew what he had done? How did she go to bed at night with him knowing what he had done? Why did she have 32 interviews with police before she rustled up the story of the hit man? Julie’s story doesn’t convince me and I wonder how it managed to convince anyone. What I have seen of her she appears monotone, dull but from what we know of her I doubt she was afraid of Jeremy and if she had the opportunity to be free of him why did she take such a long time?  Julie was a working class girl. She must have thought all her Christmases had come at one when she met with Jeremy, rich, intelligent, good looking, well educated the envy of every man. He could have had any woman he wanted and she knew that. She must have felt lucky to have been the chosen one.

Julie she was doing an MA at university to be a teacher.  She had committed cheque book fraud with her friend by reporting it stolen and going on a spree with her friend. There are statements showing that she would have immunity from prosecution over this matter if she testified against Jeremy and if she didn’t she would have a criminal record and never be the teacher she wanted to be. She is now head teacher at a school in Canada. Jeremy cheated on Julie with her friend, he admits it’s true. Julie also claimed Jeremy was bisexual and this was used in evidence against him. Why on earth would anyone tell their girlfriend they were going to do those killings and not make her his alibi? Why did he cheat on her with her own best mate? Surely it would have been his priority to keep her sweet? Julie also said in other statements that she had hired a solicitor to handle the press offering her money for her story, she raked in a cool 25k on Jeremy's conviction (worth a lot more in 1985 than by today's standards) from the News of the World. Julie Mugford, I am convinced personally that she was a liar who was driven by money to carry out her testimony against Jeremy.