Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 403 comments are related to the topic:
A German documentary about 911.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 10 of 11  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 403
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 16:28
By the way Don

Have you put in your pennies worth regarding the molten metal debate.
By:
Ampleforth
When: 03 Oct 12 16:28
Angel..

1) Do you believe that American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon? if the answer is no, please proceed to question 2
2) Do you believe the Cruise misile theory? if the answer is no, please proceed to question 3
3) What do you believe caused the explosion at the Pentagon?



MOMM, I appreciate your response, you say it was a plane, do you mean  American Airlines Flight 77? or another plane, remote controlled or otherwise....
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 16:31
GPT

I gurantee if you post a clip of a 757 crashing into the Pentagon, then it will go GLOBAL.
By:
GPT
When: 03 Oct 12 16:34
No need to they are there already clearly you can't be ar$ed to look so moving on as we have succesfully debunked every point you have made so far.
Let's go back to why they(whoever they are the Illuminati/lizard peopleLaugh)didn't just blow the towers up why the need for remote controlled planes?
By:
GPT
When: 03 Oct 12 16:35
I'll give you 20 minutes going to have some tea and a piece of fruit cake.
By:
DonNo1
When: 03 Oct 12 16:35
I notice that you said conspiracy theorists, to put everyone who raises questions under the same umbrella.

Yet it was only Paradox who posted the video.


Well forgive me if im wrong but weren't you open to the idea that a missile struck the Pentagon AG despite numerous eye witness accounts it was a airliner and many specially saying it was an AA jet?
By:
DonNo1
When: 03 Oct 12 16:42
I'm not sure AG, im not a scientist but I find it odd that there'd still be molten iron weeks after which is what was reported, implies the building must have been completely deliberatly laced by the insiders in order to maintain the temperature to keep it molten
By:
Ampleforth
When: 03 Oct 12 16:45
To be fair GPT, no film of an airline hitting the Pentagon exists....



Current Pentagon Beliefs

Paradox = Cruise missile launched from Military plane at low level painted to look like American Airlines Flight 77 that then sloped off relatively unnoticed, as of yet no explanation as to what happened to Flight 77

Angel = Previously stated missile/military plane struck the pentagon, however is now refusing to answer questions on the subject and would prefer to talk about molten metal in New York.

MOMM = Plane strike, although as of yet no response to which/whose plane.
By:
GPT
When: 03 Oct 12 16:48
Really I've seen several I think you are going over to the dark side Ampleforth.
By:
Ampleforth
When: 03 Oct 12 16:50
well, I think you should post a link then, just to keep the peace and let us move on.....
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 16:51
GPT

If you have been found out by your own side.

Perhaps i should start another thread to request the entire forum for a clip of a 757 hitting the Pentagon.
By:
Ampleforth
When: 03 Oct 12 16:53
Until evidence is bought forward of the film, I think we can assume that one doesn't exist, can we move on?

Angel..

1) Do you believe that American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon? if the answer is no, please proceed to question 2
2) Do you believe the Cruise misile theory? if the answer is no, please proceed to question 3
3) What do you believe caused the explosion at the Pentagon?
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 16:55
Ampleforth

Yes i did suppose the missile theory, but i will be honest the Pentagon crash had never really interested me. If you go through the thread i also said that the Pentagon information or lack of footage could just be be a red herring to cross contaminate the conspiracy movement.

Keep it secret and keep em guessing kind of thing. If the 757 hit so be it, but i would like to see the footage.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 16:58
The reference point for myself regarding questioning the official account are.

Operation Able Danger
The collapse of WTC7.
By:
GPT
When: 03 Oct 12 17:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzFqXbfv_yg
How much can I sell this unseen video footage for please?
I've had me tea and fruit cake still no reply from Angel I seeLaugh
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 17:02
Sorry i can`t convincingly answer your questions Amp.

If i had to put money on it either way i would really struggle.
By:
Ampleforth
When: 03 Oct 12 17:02
thank you.... and on that note I suggest a recess.... I am going home now Happyand will return later...
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 17:06
No problem Amp.Happy
By:
GPT
When: 03 Oct 12 17:08
Still no replyLaugh
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 17:08
GPT

That is the blurred/white dash clip i referred to earlier in the clip. That clip is well known.

Can you show me the clip you have which shows the 757 crashing into the Pentagon.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 17:09
GPT

That clip has been mocked for a long time. You should have known this.

Never mind i will start another thread.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 03 Oct 12 17:15
Angel Gabrial 03 Oct 12 15:57 Joined: 09 May 05 | Topic/replies: 7,372 | Blogger: Angel Gabrial's blog
Paradox

For a minute i thought that you had found some footage of a 757 crashing into the Pentagon.

No idea what GPT claims to have seen. He refuses to post it. He is the only i know who has seen it.

Apart from the clip of the white/blur i`m not sure there has been anything else released by the Pentagon.
By:
man of many moods
When: 03 Oct 12 18:41
Ampleforth     03 Oct 12 16:45 

Current Pentagon Beliefs

MOMM = Plane strike, although as of yet no response to which/whose plane.



What are you doing?
By:
Ampleforth
When: 03 Oct 12 18:48
Sorry if I have misinterpreted your statement of Yes, Ampleforth, it was a plane which crashed into the Pentagon If so, please let me know and I will retract the post and insinuation of my post
By:
Pokermonster
When: 19 Apr 13 20:23
Just resurrecting this thread in response to the current false flag discussion.
By:
Pokermonster
When: 02 May 13 19:39
Resurrected again by request.
By:
Pokermonster
When: 26 Jul 15 22:55
To the top.
By:
Pokermonster
When: 05 Sep 15 18:32
Resurrected for Injera.
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 05 Sep 15 18:57
Can you sum this thread up in one post, can't be bothered to read 387 commentsGrin
By:
Injera
When: 05 Sep 15 19:08
Thanks Poker!!

There was a good documentary the other night on the building of One World Trade Center.
By:
breadnbutter
When: 06 Sep 15 00:55
Was it made of plaster of Paris ,lolly pop sticks and chewing gum ?
By:
trilby22
When: 06 Sep 15 08:57
Your link appears to have been removed, Pokermonster.

"The YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement."

Do you have another?

Cool avatar, btw Cool
By:
breadnbutter
When: 06 Sep 15 13:05
Decent video on you tube about the pentagon missile ,cops that were on the ground and other witnesses interviewed ,at the end policeman admits things were not as they seemed ,cop admits people were on the ground on the day making plays,and there was a fake over.plane could not and did not take the approach that the official story says.Missile hit the pentagon although like the towers there was a plane/planes in the vicinity.Eye witness accounts of any event often prove to be the least reliable source of what actually  has occurred and this documentary shows that,the human eye and brain are easily deceived .Plane could not have been where the official story says it was due to the terrain  and topography it was Impossible,far fetched official account came from Hollywood .Whether you can handle that reality is your choice but to explain it away along the lines of it would involve too many people is a nonsense ,it was a disgrace that needs exposed for what it was ,why would people even contemplate washing it over and stooging up for it makes zero sense.In case anyone has not noticed we now have a potential serious conflict between
Russia and USA  and it has the potential to severely impact on your meaningless little lives ,but just keep yor eyes wide shut and you will be just fine n dandy .
By:
Injera
When: 06 Sep 15 13:33
Every aspect of the official report into 9/11 is questionable.

The Pentagon was clearly not hit by a plane of any great size at all. It was most probably hit by a missile. The initial hole is evidence enough.

Experts have questioned the flight path/speed needed to land a passenger plane on a lawn and hit the ground floor in a precise way. I'm no pilot but that hole is not the damage a passenger aircraft would make, unless the aircraft had no wings....

The Flight 93 episode is even more bewildering. Eye witnesses saw NO PLANE.

Below comes from 'Shoestring 9/11':

"This crash was different. There was no wreckage, no
bodies, and no noise."
- Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller [1]

"I was looking for anything that said tail, wing, plane, metal.
There was nothing."
- Photographer Scott Spangler [2]

"I was amazed because it did not, in any way, shape, or form,
look like a plane crash."
- Patrick Madigan, commander of the Somerset
barracks of the Pennsylvania State Police [3]

Many people who witnessed the site where United Airlines Flight 93 is supposed to have gone down on September 11, 2001, have said how little it resembled what they expected the scene of a plane crash to look like.
By:
trilby22
When: 06 Sep 15 19:40
What got me, in the first instance, was the way all the "wreckage" from the two towers was instantly whisked away without any forensic study what-so-ever.

Also, they handily found an incriminating passport at the scene.

WALOB
By:
bacontrout.
When: 06 Sep 15 21:34
No on ever follows through their theories. If you think it's crazy that they might find a passport ^ (and I could point to countless other examples of it happening, the recent ukraine crash for one), explain why they would plant it? With all the other crushing evidence of a fkin plane hitting the WTC, why would they throw that in? Is the policeman that handed in part of the conspiracy too?
By:
breadnbutter
When: 06 Sep 15 21:47
What evidence was there of a plane ? what plane parts did they find ?  Suppose the hijackers left a how to fly a jumbo manual and a Koran in their cars or at home ,standard procedure imo
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 06 Sep 15 23:09
Whilst believing the buildings were brought down by demolition........... If there were no planes, exactly what happened to the people that was meant to be on them ?
By:
Rockinron
When: 07 Sep 15 12:54
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYDxvm5yZmE&feature=g-vrec
That Video has been pulled off Youtube....no longer available!
Makes ya think dunnit !
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 07 Sep 15 20:53
So nobody has an answer as to what happened to the people meant to be on the planes given the planes that flew into the buildings were phantom? it's one of the more dumb theories.
Page 10 of 11  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com