9/11 was it a conspiracy?

It definitely was a conspiracy. Loads of Muslim extremists conspired to fly planes into buildings. Next question...

What about the protest last month that NO American news agencys covered at the twin towers site?  1000s of people protesting about what is being built but not allowed to be "mentioned" in the media?

It was staged just to go to war 100%

End of thread

interesting point jacqui

looks dodgy for sure

Everything proves a conspiracy.....don,t you know?

Plane crashes in field. No bodies found. HTEHB?

Answer: No.

Body parts were found.

Conspiracy my backside. Some people look for a conspiracy in everything. I agree things like the 1st man on the moon have a bit of intrigue and challenge but to question 9/11 is obscene.

When you have terrorist groups who plan and carry out mass murder and claim responsibilty they seem a more likely candidate than a country slaughtering its own and causing untold damage!

There was no plane boggle. I didn't fall about 3000 feet. It wasn't doing "probably 500 or 600 mph as that is impossible. It didn't disappear into the ground as that is physically impossible. A 130 ton jet as you call it cannot fit into a hole 30 feet deep. There was no "ignition of fuel". The only photo that exists is the fake photo that Val Mclatchey showed to the world, which is fake. Fuel burning is black, her photo shows a puff of smoke that is grey and is inconsistent with the site of the alleged crash. Bodies and blood didn't survive the crash but bibles and terrorist bandanas did? Do you realise how stupid you sound?

So flight UA175 (the alleged 2nd one at WTC), which was, according to official estimates doing 550mph (don't laugh, planes have broken up at lesser speeds and can't fly this fast at sea level) cut through steel beams as it landed inside the South Tower,only exploding once inside the building. Nevertheless wedding rings (soft gold), terrorist passports and boarding cards survived the inferno.

How ****ing stupid do you have to be to buy this crap?

Do I sound as half as stupid as you?

So what's your theory, Valero?

It's unreasonable to think that a plane nosedives into the ground and there's nothing very much left?

Has anyone got any loose change please?

I wonder what Clockwork would have to say. I wonder what he's doing now? I felt a bit bad for him after his first I'm leaving the forum forever! announcement was met with such little interest and proved to be untrue within 24 hours. At least he's sticking to it this time. Good luck to him, wherever he is and whatever he's doing.

lol! That's marvellous!

I've watched archive American news broadcasts of the aftermath of Flight 93.

Journos on the scene repeatedly say 'there's nothing there but a great big hole'.

As for the Towers, many, many firefighters reported explosion after explosion coming from the basement areas of both towers.

There are are dozens of other controversies. One that shocked me was the finding of molten (!!!!!!!!!!) steel weeks after the towers collapsed.

Exploding aviation fuel, gas etc etc. does not generate molten steel.

melting steel would generate molten steel IMO.

sparkmaster. Joined: 07 Aug 01
Replies: 9497 01 Aug 10 13:01 
melting steel would generate molten steel IMO.


Of course no steel was melted that day, it was just heated enough to structurly weaken it.

As usual,Clockwork is right.
It never ceases to amaze me what lies we can be told by the powers that be,until I read the stuff from people on here who seem to have no critical faculties whatsoever,and then I realise how "they" get away with it.
There has been,and always will be,a majority of people that will believe the official version of events,and "they" know that and that's why they can do it.
Governments have known this for years.Hitler knew it.Stalin knew it.
Nothing will change.

Yes, he is.

To be honest I'm surprised the fred has taken off at all, albeit with very few contributions.

Still, it was worth it for As usual,Clockwork is right.
That made me chuckle.