Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
sunderlandfan
26 Nov 09 17:52
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Jun 05
| Topic/replies: 290 | Blogger: sunderlandfan's blog
In my opinion yes...
To urinate on a memorial dedicated to those who lost their lives so that he might enjoy his freedoms today is the most distrespectful thing I can think of, not only to those who died, but also deeply hurtful to their families.
I guess the lad is just stupid as f**k.. but then I read in the paper that he goes to Sheffield Hallam, so I guess go figure....
Pause Switch to Standard View Should the lad who urinated on the...
Show More
Loading...
Report tobermory November 26, 2009 5:54 PM GMT
he was drunk tbf
Report sunderlandfan November 26, 2009 5:55 PM GMT
oh right... so that makes it ok....
Report wur November 26, 2009 5:56 PM GMT
Yeh, probably thought the poppies needed watering.
Report clarkson November 26, 2009 5:57 PM GMT
no
Report tobermory November 26, 2009 5:57 PM GMT
don't make it ok , but makes it less likely he actually knew it was a war memorial
Report Zola's Back Heel November 26, 2009 5:58 PM GMT
I'd be more concerned about the priests molesting 100's of children and effectively getting away with it.
Report eastwood 23 November 26, 2009 6:00 PM GMT
Prisons are full of people who have committed violent crimes while drunk.
Report Mister E November 26, 2009 6:03 PM GMT
The people who sent lots of lads to their death in Iraq should be in prison first, then this lad.
Report portmanpark November 26, 2009 6:04 PM GMT
sunderland........prison is for real criminals.......he is just an a.rse
Report sunderlandfan November 26, 2009 6:05 PM GMT
maybe prison would have been a bit extreme....
maybe a huge fine would have been better, so that he doesnt have any of his tax payer funded student loan left to go out and get sozzled with......
add to that a large sentence of community service
Report tobermory November 26, 2009 6:05 PM GMT
It's no excuse for violence at all , as that would always be serious ( unless in self defence).

Urinating in public is an offence , but obviously it is a lot more offensive on a war memorial , so wether he was aware of this is important imo.
Report Zola's Back Heel November 26, 2009 6:07 PM GMT
BBC report said photographer saw him alseep in the doorwar of a shop. he got up. fell over. got up. fell over again. then got up and committed his heinous premeditated crime agains humanity before falling over again and staggering away.
Report curious-cat November 26, 2009 6:10 PM GMT
I'd be more concerned about Tony Blair making things up in order to invade Iraq and effectively getting away with it.
Report curious-cat November 26, 2009 6:11 PM GMT
......... causing the unnecessary deaths of thousands.
Report Video_Lounge November 26, 2009 6:33 PM GMT
No
Report Johnnee November 26, 2009 6:34 PM GMT
he should be made to lick said memorial clean, every day for a month, after the town tramp has p1ssed on it every day.
Report STUDYFORM November 26, 2009 6:34 PM GMT
no
Report Easter 1916 November 26, 2009 6:36 PM GMT
1.01 he knew what he was doing, p1ssed or not. 250hrs community service seems fair enough to me.
Report Bamboo November 26, 2009 6:42 PM GMT
no way
Report JUGADOR MEJOR November 26, 2009 6:43 PM GMT
Imo, Urinating in any public place deserves a severe punishment, there are always options, wee in a bottle or find the nearest public toilet fight with the gays and flashers, empty out. Tap off your mates girlfriend and have a partly cooked pie with ***** What a good night that was i woke up in a hedge with some tranny's wig shoved down my trousers and a used condom in my sock, God knows where that policemans torch came from.

Sorry i digressed, dirty** chop off their todgers.
Report JUGADOR MEJOR November 26, 2009 6:45 PM GMT
^^^The word s c u m was censored
Report Gene Hackman November 26, 2009 6:47 PM GMT
If he'd had prevous,yes.
As he hadn't and was apparently genuinely contrite,no.
Report FatherMaguire November 26, 2009 7:11 PM GMT
I read that story and thought "there but for the grace of God go I" - I would never do such a thing normally (obviously), but I occasionally get thoughtlessly drunk and have occasionally urinated where I shouldnt - if he genuinely didnt know, then stick him with a fine and a bindover and let him get on with it
Report madsimon November 26, 2009 7:16 PM GMT
i think he got the right punishment-he seemed contrite enough. However i dont like this 'I was drunk so its not realy my fault ' line as you choose to drink so you should knwo the consequences
Report JUGADOR MEJOR November 26, 2009 7:21 PM GMT
Your honour, i was only carrying the weapon in self defence, however i was very, very, very drunk at the time.
Report curious-cat November 26, 2009 7:21 PM GMT
how many forumites have**ed in the wardrobe while drunk ?
Report onetruesaxon1964 November 26, 2009 7:26 PM GMT
soldiers die for our once great country ,families lose loved ones in wars we shouldnt be in,public floggings is wat we need wat he did drunk or not is a disgrace to our brave soldiers
Report evingolis November 26, 2009 8:48 PM GMT
"we fought the forces of fascism blah blah blah"
yet when some young kid takes a drunken pee on a war memorial these people want to throw him in jail.

irony.
Report Howdi November 26, 2009 8:51 PM GMT
yes
Report Journeyman November 26, 2009 8:52 PM GMT
"we fought the forces of fascism blah blah blah"
yet when some young kid takes a drunken pee on a war memorial these people want to throw him in jail.

irony.


Indeed
Report JUGADOR MEJOR November 26, 2009 8:53 PM GMT
Enforcement of the law is not facism. d1ckhead
Report The Priest November 26, 2009 9:01 PM GMT
I'd be more concerned about the priests molesting 100's of children and effectively getting away with it.

Expect a letter from my solicitor
Report terry mccann November 26, 2009 9:03 PM GMT
nope as he didnt know what he was doing
Report Journeyman November 26, 2009 9:12 PM GMT

onetruesaxon1964 26 Nov 20:26
soldiers die for our once great country ,families lose loved ones in wars we shouldnt be in,public floggings is wat we need wat he did drunk or not is a disgrace to our brave soldiers


So turn your ire to those responsible for the dreadful situation we're in.
But no it's far easier to pick on some kid who was drunk. An easier target.

This is one of the most depressing threads I've read in weeks.
Report limited ability November 26, 2009 9:24 PM GMT
No, definately not.

The young lad was in the wrong and he knows it and has apologised.

He will have to live with the embarassment and shame of what he did for the rest of his life.

Community service is the correct punishment.
Report Zola's Back Heel November 26, 2009 9:30 PM GMT
Expect a letter from my solicitor

I think you've done enough soliciting.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com