Forums

Cheltenham Festival

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 138 comments are related to the topic:
RYANAIR CHASE

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 138
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 07 Feb 16 22:00
just looking at the results, Budd - he is recorded as a non runner so therefore I'm assuming he must have been declared at final declaration point i.e. declared on Wed for GC, ran in Ryanair on Thurs, declared as non runner in Gold Cup on Fri.

I've not looked up the rules just reaching a conclusion based on history.
By:
miltons sophie
When: 07 Feb 16 22:05
but this is potentially the other way round so if they declare him for ryanair but run him in gc they would have to nr him for ryanair and presumably have to give a reason?? dont they have to have a good reason? the point i guess is that because the ryanir is first doesnt that increase the odds further of him running in ryanair - because it would be a big risk not to declare him and once decalred they have to have a good reason not to run him - my head hurts
By:
delsie777
When: 07 Feb 16 22:11
Have a lie down miltons...
By:
buddeliea
When: 07 Feb 16 22:13
im having a lie down now.....hopefully in the morning someone will have solved this one!!
By:
wellchief
When: 07 Feb 16 22:14
I think he'll be in the Ryanair regardless of the ground.  I'd say Valseur Lido is the one where the decision will be made last minute.
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 07 Feb 16 22:17
I know they can declare him a non runner if there is a going change from the time they declared him until the day of the race - beyond that I'm not coertain
By:
SEATHESTARS....NO1
When: 07 Feb 16 23:11
Only in handicaps is there a rule where if a trainer has declared to run they have to have a good reason not to run. In any other class/type of race you can legally double declare then pull them out, though without reason i am sure they lose declaration moneys paid. The reason the rule is there for handicaps is that a trainer can declare a top weight to keep the weights down for another of their runners, thus not allowing more competition into the race. The after declaration just not run the top weight save it for another day their other runner off 10 stone then romps home cos theres little or no other competition, i am pretty sure a couple of trainers down the years have fallen foul to this rule and been fined by the BHA.
By:
buddeliea
When: 08 Feb 16 06:58
I have a nasty feeling you are right Chief,but I cling to the fact that his owner said he thinks he would have won last year on better ground.
By:
DECALEC
When: 08 Feb 16 08:53
The change was made to allow others that would otherwise have been balloted out to give them a chance of a run nothing to do with skullduggery stsCrazy
By:
charwell.
When: 08 Feb 16 22:42
Vatour runs in the Ryanair and wins well.
By:
jasey
When: 08 Feb 16 23:02
No chance of that now he's going straight to Cheltenham.
By:
charwell.
When: 08 Feb 16 23:12
Why not?

A non stayer just out of novice status who evidently looked like a non stayer in the KG. Would be a shoe in in the Ryanair. Also have GC hopeful aside from him.

I think they will play safe this year and attempt the GC next year when he can go for a treble of Chelt victories. Any rain will force their hand further.

Have a sneaky feeling they will bottle it and take the low hanging fruit. Will look a bit silly when he runs out of puff going into the business end of the GC.
By:
ACStafford
When: 08 Feb 16 23:15
Is Vautour definitely going straight there now? Right decision Imo, but I thought they were toying with running him in a prep?
By:
jasey
When: 08 Feb 16 23:32
Ricci wanted him to run in Denman but Mullins wants to send him Straight to Cheltenham.
Mullins makes the decisions so i take it he goes straight to Gold Cup.
Nowhere else to run him if he don't run in Denman.
By:
jasey
When: 08 Feb 16 23:37
I don't think you can say a horse is a non stayer after only one run at 3 mile.
I will be amazed if he runs in Ryanair(Grade 1 in name only this year the way it's looking).
By:
Jb23
When: 09 Feb 16 09:09
Jesus. First run at 3 miles & is beaten in a photo yet is categorically a non stayer. Tough crowd.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 09 Feb 16 10:42
In what looks a vintage KG too!
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 09 Feb 16 11:37
Yep, that KG form could hardly have been better franked this last two weeks, with Smad Place and Valseur Lido both putting in eye-catching performances.
By contrast the Lexus form has taken a bit of a knock.
By not prepping Vautour, he hasn't the opportunity to categorically prove he doesn't get 3 miles - I think he'll be fine by the way - and so straight to CGC it is.
What wins this race, I've no idea! My fancy for a while has been Champagne West, but he disappointed the last day. I think he could still run a big race and hope his mark isn't attractive enough to Hobbs to have a stab at a 'cap. I've taken small insurance for the Plate anyway, just in case.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 09 Feb 16 11:46
All winter I was sure they would run Vautour in the Ryanair as Djakadam was so prominent in the betting for the GC.

But after his fall, and what you could only say is an uncertain prep, I think Ruby will find it easier to get off him, thus paving the way for him and Vautour to go for Gold. I can't believe anyone can suggest he doesnt stay. Its plain daft, on the basis of one run in a top class race where he was beaten a nose. He has always been a much better horse on spring ground in March. We know he loves the place and that must count for a lot. If he's 20 lengths clear coming over the last he might not even need to stay that well!
By:
SEATHESTARS....NO1
When: 09 Feb 16 11:51
Vautour reminds me too much of One Man and Florida Pearl, ok two completely different horses, (one didn't even win outside of Ireland which is obviously surely just a coincidence) but neither one stayed in the CGC or looked like hosing up to the point of the hill. Cry
By:
slowerthanjohn
When: 09 Feb 16 11:55
Who didn't win outside of Ireland? One ManCrazy Florida Pearl won twice at Cheltenham, a King George and at Aintree.
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 09 Feb 16 11:57
Florida Pearl won a King George, a Martell Cup and at the Festival twice STS, plus he looked like winning a CGC before getting caught close home by Looks Like Trouble. His record over here was top notch.
You might be thinking of Beef or Salmon? But Vautour is nothing like him, nothing at all.
One Man was better over shorter, as he proved by winning a Champion Chase. I suppose one could see the similarities there, if he fails to stay at Cheltenham - but not yet.
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 09 Feb 16 11:58
LOL, I'm slowerthanslowerthanjohn Laugh
By:
slowerthanjohn
When: 09 Feb 16 11:59
Ha ha I feel for you DesmondLaugh
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 09 Feb 16 12:01
I like the sound of my own voice too much. A punchy reply like yours and I'd've beaten you to it. But I had to prattle on for three lines!
By:
slowerthanjohn
When: 09 Feb 16 12:03
At least your prattle is correctLaughI was a little shocked when I read about hadn't won outside IrelandWhoops so I don't think you would Tongue Out
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 09 Feb 16 12:20
To be fair, I think STS picked up on another comment on a different thread that was talking about both Florida Pearl and Beef or Salmon, the poster stated that one of them had never won outside of Ireland - I just think STS got his wires crossed as he probably wasn't watching racing at the time.
By:
slowerthanjohn
When: 09 Feb 16 12:45
Everyone makes mistakes and everyone is entitled to an opinion but if you try to back your opinion up with facts at least get your facts correctWink
By:
DECALEC
When: 09 Feb 16 13:39
STS on a lunch break,don't worry we can't see your rednerExcitedBlush
By:
duffy
When: 09 Feb 16 13:53
It's not the fact Vautour got beat a nose and how can you say he didn't stay on that basis, it was the manner of the defeat.

If you asked someone before the race to explain what you would expect to see in the race to heavily suggest that Vautour won't stay the Gold cup trip, you would describe precisely what actually happened in the race.

Travels powerfully into the straight with everyone wondering how far? somehow doesn't finish the race off to the extent he was travelling turning in.

Again, it's not the narrow defeat, he could have got beat a couple of lengths but had performed differently through the race and you could have come away thinking he does stay, but not in this case, he put on a performance of a stereo-typical non stayer IMO.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 09 Feb 16 14:11
What would say about Smad Place's run duffy? Ran like even more of a non stayer?
By:
duffy
When: 09 Feb 16 14:19
No, you can't just look at finishing positions in isolation, smad place stays further but he was simply taken off of his feet through the race which hurt him, just because he stays and vautour finished in front of him means that vautour must stay, it's not black and white like that is it.
By:
duffy
When: 09 Feb 16 14:23
Plus it was the best race SP had ever run in and he was simply exposed, his run next time, as impressive as it was didn't in truth frank the form as with Djak out of the race it had no credible GC markers left in it to beat, the same as if SP had got beat out of sight it wouldn't have left a black mark against the KG either.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 09 Feb 16 14:24
No. But it isnt black and white to say that a horse doesnt stay because he didnt quite get home either. The ground was testing, they went a real gallop, and he almost certainly wasnt at his peak. I think he blew up more than didnt stay myself. A bit like he did at Ascot coming to the last when he didnt finish far ahead of Ptit Zig.

Time will tell, and this debate has been done to death (!), but my view is that you cant call him a non stayer yet.
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 09 Feb 16 14:25
But Smad Place is further away at the line than when they turn in, you would expect he would be doing his best work at the end, surely?
Al Ferof was also closer and ended up miles back.
There's no doubt that the brutal pace of the race meant that even the horses at the front of the race finished leggy, but that doesn't mean they didn't stay either. Horses always slow down at the end of races. Cue Card probably outstayed Vautour to get up - but there's no shame in that as he's now a top notcher over 3m and as Paddy said, was all-out to do that. Doesn't mean either of them didn't stay.
By:
duffy
When: 09 Feb 16 14:25
Vautour may well stay, and I believe that if the Ryanair is the only alternative he should definitely run in the GC as he's too good a horse (the best in training) to not find out about.
By:
duffy
When: 09 Feb 16 14:28
IMO their class is such that they could hurt SP through the race and keep going even though they aren't at their most effective to not allow his stamina to come into play...SP was simply outclassed.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 09 Feb 16 14:35
Spot on Des. Running the last few furlongs ever so slightly slower than Cue Card, one of the best about, doesn't mean you 'haven't stayed'. Its all relative.
By:
duffy
When: 09 Feb 16 14:38
Yeah, with Brennan getting off and stating that the horse doesn't want to go another yard (or words to that effect)Wink
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 09 Feb 16 14:42
Of course he didn't Duffy (though he would've if asked Love ). They'd just done 3 miles at a suicidal pace, they all finished knackered. Well, those that finished and didn't brush through the top of one and crumple tiredly on landing Wink
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com